TY - JOUR
T1 - Indonesian Mathematics Teachers’ and Educators’ Perspectives on Social Media Platforms
T2 - The Case of Educational Facebook Groups
AU - Patahuddin, Sitti Maesuri
AU - Rokhmah, Siti
AU - Lowrie, Tom
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank all participants involved in this research. We would also like to thank the Graduate Research Office of the University of Canberra for their support, and our colleagues Dr. Elke Stracke and Meredith Box from the Faculty of Education, University of Canberra for their thoughtful and constructive feedback on earlier versions of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, De La Salle University.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Facebook groups (FGs) have been widely used by teachers/educators. However, the type of educational FGs they value most, and the reasons for their choices, are less clear. This paper examines the perspectives of 440 participants (86% mathematics teachers and 14% mathematics teacher educators) on their educational FGs. It identifies the types of FGs they value most, the reasons for their choices, and aspects they dislike. Data collected through an online survey suggests that FGs are used for professional engagement across Indonesia. Support for FGs included the perceived benefits of sharing information/resources about mathematics (as well as education in general), networking and communication with others, opportunities for teacher professional development sessions and announcements about/access to up-to-date information. However, limitations with the platform included occasional irrelevant posts/comments, unexpected member behaviour and the lack of responsiveness from FGs administrators. Commonly, most participants saw value in discipline-specific (i.e. mathematics) engagement, leading to professional learning/support. This study stimulated further discussion on ways to maximise benefits whilst simultaneously overcoming the identified challenges of these participant-driven online communities.
AB - Facebook groups (FGs) have been widely used by teachers/educators. However, the type of educational FGs they value most, and the reasons for their choices, are less clear. This paper examines the perspectives of 440 participants (86% mathematics teachers and 14% mathematics teacher educators) on their educational FGs. It identifies the types of FGs they value most, the reasons for their choices, and aspects they dislike. Data collected through an online survey suggests that FGs are used for professional engagement across Indonesia. Support for FGs included the perceived benefits of sharing information/resources about mathematics (as well as education in general), networking and communication with others, opportunities for teacher professional development sessions and announcements about/access to up-to-date information. However, limitations with the platform included occasional irrelevant posts/comments, unexpected member behaviour and the lack of responsiveness from FGs administrators. Commonly, most participants saw value in discipline-specific (i.e. mathematics) engagement, leading to professional learning/support. This study stimulated further discussion on ways to maximise benefits whilst simultaneously overcoming the identified challenges of these participant-driven online communities.
KW - Facebook group
KW - Mathematics teachers and educators
KW - Professional development
KW - Social networking sites
KW - Value of Facebook groups
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081892582&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40299-020-00503-3
DO - 10.1007/s40299-020-00503-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081892582
SN - 0119-5646
VL - 29
SP - 519
EP - 528
JO - Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
JF - Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
IS - 6
ER -