Induced dispersal in wildlife management: experimental evaluation of the risk of hybrid breakdown and the benefit of hybrid vigor in the F1 generation

Clare Holleley, Richard Nichols, Michael Whitehead, Melissa Gunn, Jyoutsna Gupta, William Sherwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Management practices often aim to increase the level of gene flow by either: introducing animals from captive breeding programs, ranslocating animals from abundant areas, or increasing the chance of animals dispersing between populations by creating habitat corridors. These practices provide opportunity for the hybrid offspring of introduced and resident animals to experience either increased fitness (hybrid vigor) or decreased fitness (hybrid breakdown). There is very little quantitative data available to adequately assess whether hybridization is likely to be beneficial or detrimental to populations managed in these ways. Using Drosophila melanogaster populations, we conducted two experiments that simulate the common management practices of translocation and wildlife habitat corridors. We monitored the frequency and magnitude of hybrid vigor and hybrid breakdown in F1 hybrids to assess the relative risks and benefits to populations and also monitored net productivity (number of adults produced from controlled crosses) to assess whether the populations were stable or in decline. In the translocation experiment, we observed instances of both significant hybrid vigor and hybrid breakdown, both occurring at a frequency of 9%. In the habitat corridor experiments, populations with moderate to high dispersal (1-4% per generation) did not develop significant hybrid vigor or hybrid breakdown. However, of the populations experiencing low dispersal (0.25% per generation) for 34 generations, 6% displayed significant hybrid vigor and 6% displayed significant hybrid breakdown. These results suggest that in first generation hybrids there may be limited opportunity to utilize hybrid vigor as a tool to increase the short-term viability of populations because there is an equal likelihood of encountering hybrid breakdown that may drive the population into further decline. However, our results apply only to populations of moderate size (N = 50; Ne = 14.3) in the absence of deliberate consanguineous mating. Lastly, we observed that net productivity was positively correlated with dispersal rate, suggesting that initial F1 declines in fitness may be temporary and that it is preferable to maintain high levels of selectable variation via induced dispersal to assist the long-term survival of vulnerable populations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-40
Number of pages10
JournalConservation Genetics
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hybrid Vigor
wildlife management
vigor
heterosis
risk assessment
Population
habitat corridor
Ecosystem
Practice Management
fitness
animal
animals
evaluation
Gene Flow
translocation
Population Dynamics
Vulnerable Populations
Population Density
management practice
Drosophila melanogaster

Cite this

Holleley, Clare ; Nichols, Richard ; Whitehead, Michael ; Gunn, Melissa ; Gupta, Jyoutsna ; Sherwin, William. / Induced dispersal in wildlife management: experimental evaluation of the risk of hybrid breakdown and the benefit of hybrid vigor in the F1 generation. In: Conservation Genetics. 2011 ; Vol. 12. pp. 31-40.
@article{0886feefb09e4b8e8cf1579aa3444aa2,
title = "Induced dispersal in wildlife management: experimental evaluation of the risk of hybrid breakdown and the benefit of hybrid vigor in the F1 generation",
abstract = "Management practices often aim to increase the level of gene flow by either: introducing animals from captive breeding programs, ranslocating animals from abundant areas, or increasing the chance of animals dispersing between populations by creating habitat corridors. These practices provide opportunity for the hybrid offspring of introduced and resident animals to experience either increased fitness (hybrid vigor) or decreased fitness (hybrid breakdown). There is very little quantitative data available to adequately assess whether hybridization is likely to be beneficial or detrimental to populations managed in these ways. Using Drosophila melanogaster populations, we conducted two experiments that simulate the common management practices of translocation and wildlife habitat corridors. We monitored the frequency and magnitude of hybrid vigor and hybrid breakdown in F1 hybrids to assess the relative risks and benefits to populations and also monitored net productivity (number of adults produced from controlled crosses) to assess whether the populations were stable or in decline. In the translocation experiment, we observed instances of both significant hybrid vigor and hybrid breakdown, both occurring at a frequency of 9{\%}. In the habitat corridor experiments, populations with moderate to high dispersal (1-4{\%} per generation) did not develop significant hybrid vigor or hybrid breakdown. However, of the populations experiencing low dispersal (0.25{\%} per generation) for 34 generations, 6{\%} displayed significant hybrid vigor and 6{\%} displayed significant hybrid breakdown. These results suggest that in first generation hybrids there may be limited opportunity to utilize hybrid vigor as a tool to increase the short-term viability of populations because there is an equal likelihood of encountering hybrid breakdown that may drive the population into further decline. However, our results apply only to populations of moderate size (N = 50; Ne = 14.3) in the absence of deliberate consanguineous mating. Lastly, we observed that net productivity was positively correlated with dispersal rate, suggesting that initial F1 declines in fitness may be temporary and that it is preferable to maintain high levels of selectable variation via induced dispersal to assist the long-term survival of vulnerable populations.",
keywords = "Hybrid vigor, Hybrid breakdown, Inbreeding depression, Drosophila melanogaster, Conservation, Management, Genetic drift.",
author = "Clare Holleley and Richard Nichols and Michael Whitehead and Melissa Gunn and Jyoutsna Gupta and William Sherwin",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/s10592-009-9984-z",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "31--40",
journal = "Conservation Genetics",
issn = "1566-0621",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Induced dispersal in wildlife management: experimental evaluation of the risk of hybrid breakdown and the benefit of hybrid vigor in the F1 generation. / Holleley, Clare; Nichols, Richard; Whitehead, Michael; Gunn, Melissa; Gupta, Jyoutsna; Sherwin, William.

In: Conservation Genetics, Vol. 12, 2011, p. 31-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Induced dispersal in wildlife management: experimental evaluation of the risk of hybrid breakdown and the benefit of hybrid vigor in the F1 generation

AU - Holleley, Clare

AU - Nichols, Richard

AU - Whitehead, Michael

AU - Gunn, Melissa

AU - Gupta, Jyoutsna

AU - Sherwin, William

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Management practices often aim to increase the level of gene flow by either: introducing animals from captive breeding programs, ranslocating animals from abundant areas, or increasing the chance of animals dispersing between populations by creating habitat corridors. These practices provide opportunity for the hybrid offspring of introduced and resident animals to experience either increased fitness (hybrid vigor) or decreased fitness (hybrid breakdown). There is very little quantitative data available to adequately assess whether hybridization is likely to be beneficial or detrimental to populations managed in these ways. Using Drosophila melanogaster populations, we conducted two experiments that simulate the common management practices of translocation and wildlife habitat corridors. We monitored the frequency and magnitude of hybrid vigor and hybrid breakdown in F1 hybrids to assess the relative risks and benefits to populations and also monitored net productivity (number of adults produced from controlled crosses) to assess whether the populations were stable or in decline. In the translocation experiment, we observed instances of both significant hybrid vigor and hybrid breakdown, both occurring at a frequency of 9%. In the habitat corridor experiments, populations with moderate to high dispersal (1-4% per generation) did not develop significant hybrid vigor or hybrid breakdown. However, of the populations experiencing low dispersal (0.25% per generation) for 34 generations, 6% displayed significant hybrid vigor and 6% displayed significant hybrid breakdown. These results suggest that in first generation hybrids there may be limited opportunity to utilize hybrid vigor as a tool to increase the short-term viability of populations because there is an equal likelihood of encountering hybrid breakdown that may drive the population into further decline. However, our results apply only to populations of moderate size (N = 50; Ne = 14.3) in the absence of deliberate consanguineous mating. Lastly, we observed that net productivity was positively correlated with dispersal rate, suggesting that initial F1 declines in fitness may be temporary and that it is preferable to maintain high levels of selectable variation via induced dispersal to assist the long-term survival of vulnerable populations.

AB - Management practices often aim to increase the level of gene flow by either: introducing animals from captive breeding programs, ranslocating animals from abundant areas, or increasing the chance of animals dispersing between populations by creating habitat corridors. These practices provide opportunity for the hybrid offspring of introduced and resident animals to experience either increased fitness (hybrid vigor) or decreased fitness (hybrid breakdown). There is very little quantitative data available to adequately assess whether hybridization is likely to be beneficial or detrimental to populations managed in these ways. Using Drosophila melanogaster populations, we conducted two experiments that simulate the common management practices of translocation and wildlife habitat corridors. We monitored the frequency and magnitude of hybrid vigor and hybrid breakdown in F1 hybrids to assess the relative risks and benefits to populations and also monitored net productivity (number of adults produced from controlled crosses) to assess whether the populations were stable or in decline. In the translocation experiment, we observed instances of both significant hybrid vigor and hybrid breakdown, both occurring at a frequency of 9%. In the habitat corridor experiments, populations with moderate to high dispersal (1-4% per generation) did not develop significant hybrid vigor or hybrid breakdown. However, of the populations experiencing low dispersal (0.25% per generation) for 34 generations, 6% displayed significant hybrid vigor and 6% displayed significant hybrid breakdown. These results suggest that in first generation hybrids there may be limited opportunity to utilize hybrid vigor as a tool to increase the short-term viability of populations because there is an equal likelihood of encountering hybrid breakdown that may drive the population into further decline. However, our results apply only to populations of moderate size (N = 50; Ne = 14.3) in the absence of deliberate consanguineous mating. Lastly, we observed that net productivity was positively correlated with dispersal rate, suggesting that initial F1 declines in fitness may be temporary and that it is preferable to maintain high levels of selectable variation via induced dispersal to assist the long-term survival of vulnerable populations.

KW - Hybrid vigor

KW - Hybrid breakdown

KW - Inbreeding depression

KW - Drosophila melanogaster

KW - Conservation

KW - Management

KW - Genetic drift.

U2 - 10.1007/s10592-009-9984-z

DO - 10.1007/s10592-009-9984-z

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 31

EP - 40

JO - Conservation Genetics

JF - Conservation Genetics

SN - 1566-0621

ER -