Inferring predator-prey interactions in food webs

Justin P. F. Pomeranz, Ross M. Thompson, Timothee Poisot, Jon S. Harding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Food webs are a powerful way to represent the diversity, structure, and function of ecological systems. However, the accurate description of food webs requires significant effort in time and resources, limiting their widespread use in ecological studies. Newly published methods allow for the inference of feeding interactions using proxy variables. Here, we compare the accuracy of two recently described methods, as well as describe a composite model of the two, for the inference of feeding interactions using a large, well-described dataset. Both niche and neutral processes are involved in determining whether or not two species will form a feeding link in communities. Three different models for determining niche constraints of feeding interactions are compared, and all three models are extended by incorporating neutral processes, based on relative abundances. The three models compared here infer niche processes through (a) phylogenetic relationships, (b) local species trait distributions (e.g., body size), and (c) a composite of phylogeny and local traits. We show that all three methods perform well at predicting individual species interactions, and that these individual predictions scale up to the network level, resulting in food web structure of inferred networks being similar to their empirical counterparts. Our results indicate that inferring food web structure using phylogenies can be an efficient way of getting summary webs with minimal data, and offers a conservative test of changes in food web structure, particularly when there is low species turnover between sites. Inferences made using traits require more data, but allows for greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying trophic interactions. A composite model of the two methods provides a framework for investigating the importance of how phylogeny, trait distributions, and relative abundances, affect species interactions, and network structure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)356-367
Number of pages12
JournalMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

Pomeranz, Justin P. F. ; Thompson, Ross M. ; Poisot, Timothee ; Harding, Jon S. / Inferring predator-prey interactions in food webs. In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 356-367.
@article{edc9900ab2e94b8f8a05318d48bb49af,
title = "Inferring predator-prey interactions in food webs",
abstract = "Food webs are a powerful way to represent the diversity, structure, and function of ecological systems. However, the accurate description of food webs requires significant effort in time and resources, limiting their widespread use in ecological studies. Newly published methods allow for the inference of feeding interactions using proxy variables. Here, we compare the accuracy of two recently described methods, as well as describe a composite model of the two, for the inference of feeding interactions using a large, well-described dataset. Both niche and neutral processes are involved in determining whether or not two species will form a feeding link in communities. Three different models for determining niche constraints of feeding interactions are compared, and all three models are extended by incorporating neutral processes, based on relative abundances. The three models compared here infer niche processes through (a) phylogenetic relationships, (b) local species trait distributions (e.g., body size), and (c) a composite of phylogeny and local traits. We show that all three methods perform well at predicting individual species interactions, and that these individual predictions scale up to the network level, resulting in food web structure of inferred networks being similar to their empirical counterparts. Our results indicate that inferring food web structure using phylogenies can be an efficient way of getting summary webs with minimal data, and offers a conservative test of changes in food web structure, particularly when there is low species turnover between sites. Inferences made using traits require more data, but allows for greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying trophic interactions. A composite model of the two methods provides a framework for investigating the importance of how phylogeny, trait distributions, and relative abundances, affect species interactions, and network structure.",
keywords = "body size, food web inference, food web structure, neutral theory, niche model, trait-matching, WebBuilder",
author = "Pomeranz, {Justin P. F.} and Thompson, {Ross M.} and Timothee Poisot and Harding, {Jon S.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/2041-210X.13125",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "356--367",
journal = "Methods in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2041-210X",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "3",

}

Inferring predator-prey interactions in food webs. / Pomeranz, Justin P. F.; Thompson, Ross M.; Poisot, Timothee; Harding, Jon S.

In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2019, p. 356-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inferring predator-prey interactions in food webs

AU - Pomeranz, Justin P. F.

AU - Thompson, Ross M.

AU - Poisot, Timothee

AU - Harding, Jon S.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Food webs are a powerful way to represent the diversity, structure, and function of ecological systems. However, the accurate description of food webs requires significant effort in time and resources, limiting their widespread use in ecological studies. Newly published methods allow for the inference of feeding interactions using proxy variables. Here, we compare the accuracy of two recently described methods, as well as describe a composite model of the two, for the inference of feeding interactions using a large, well-described dataset. Both niche and neutral processes are involved in determining whether or not two species will form a feeding link in communities. Three different models for determining niche constraints of feeding interactions are compared, and all three models are extended by incorporating neutral processes, based on relative abundances. The three models compared here infer niche processes through (a) phylogenetic relationships, (b) local species trait distributions (e.g., body size), and (c) a composite of phylogeny and local traits. We show that all three methods perform well at predicting individual species interactions, and that these individual predictions scale up to the network level, resulting in food web structure of inferred networks being similar to their empirical counterparts. Our results indicate that inferring food web structure using phylogenies can be an efficient way of getting summary webs with minimal data, and offers a conservative test of changes in food web structure, particularly when there is low species turnover between sites. Inferences made using traits require more data, but allows for greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying trophic interactions. A composite model of the two methods provides a framework for investigating the importance of how phylogeny, trait distributions, and relative abundances, affect species interactions, and network structure.

AB - Food webs are a powerful way to represent the diversity, structure, and function of ecological systems. However, the accurate description of food webs requires significant effort in time and resources, limiting their widespread use in ecological studies. Newly published methods allow for the inference of feeding interactions using proxy variables. Here, we compare the accuracy of two recently described methods, as well as describe a composite model of the two, for the inference of feeding interactions using a large, well-described dataset. Both niche and neutral processes are involved in determining whether or not two species will form a feeding link in communities. Three different models for determining niche constraints of feeding interactions are compared, and all three models are extended by incorporating neutral processes, based on relative abundances. The three models compared here infer niche processes through (a) phylogenetic relationships, (b) local species trait distributions (e.g., body size), and (c) a composite of phylogeny and local traits. We show that all three methods perform well at predicting individual species interactions, and that these individual predictions scale up to the network level, resulting in food web structure of inferred networks being similar to their empirical counterparts. Our results indicate that inferring food web structure using phylogenies can be an efficient way of getting summary webs with minimal data, and offers a conservative test of changes in food web structure, particularly when there is low species turnover between sites. Inferences made using traits require more data, but allows for greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying trophic interactions. A composite model of the two methods provides a framework for investigating the importance of how phylogeny, trait distributions, and relative abundances, affect species interactions, and network structure.

KW - body size

KW - food web inference

KW - food web structure

KW - neutral theory

KW - niche model

KW - trait-matching

KW - WebBuilder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058237690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/inferring-predatorprey-interactions-food-webs

U2 - 10.1111/2041-210X.13125

DO - 10.1111/2041-210X.13125

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 356

EP - 367

JO - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2041-210X

IS - 3

ER -