Influence of ballistic bench press on upper body power output in professional rugby players

D.J. West, D.J. Cunningham, Blair T Crewther, C.J. Cook, Liam P Kilduff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of heavy resistance exercise provides an effective preload stimulus for inducing postactivation potentiation (PAP) and increasing peak power output (PPO). However, this approach has limited application in many sporting situations (e.g., incorporation in a precompetition warm-up); and therefore, more practical strategies for inducing PAP need to be investigated. The aim of the present study was to compare the PPO changes after performing a preload stimulus of either a ballistic exercise or a traditional heavy resistance exercise. Twenty professional rugby union players completed 3 testing sessions, each separated by 48 hours. On the first occasion, subjects underwent a 3 repetition maximum (3RM)-bench press testing session. On the next 2 occasions, subjects performed a ballistic bench throw at baseline (30% of 1RM), followed by a preload stimulus of either heavy resistance training (HRT) (heavy bench press: 3 sets of 3 repetitions at 87% 1RM) or BBP (3 sets of 3 repetitions at 30% on 1RM) followed by ballistic bench throw after 8 minutes recovery. The trials were randomized and counterbalanced. Both preload stimuli protocols increased PPO compared with baseline (BBP baseline 892 ± 108 vs. 8 minutes 924 ± 119 W, p <0.001; HRT baseline 893 ± 104 vs. 8 minutes 931 ± 116 W; p , 0.001). There were no conditional differences between PPO at 8 minutes (p = 0.141); moreover, the change in PPO from baseline was also similar between conditions (BBP D + 33 ± 18; HRT D + 38 ± 21 W; p = 0.112). In conclusion, a ballistic exercise provided an effective method of inducing PAP and increasing upper-body PPO; moreover, this elicited similar increases in PPO as a traditional heavy resistance exercise preloading stimulus. © 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2282-2287
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Football
Resistance Training
4-boronic acid benzophenone

Cite this

West, D.J. ; Cunningham, D.J. ; Crewther, Blair T ; Cook, C.J. ; Kilduff, Liam P. / Influence of ballistic bench press on upper body power output in professional rugby players. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2013 ; Vol. 27, No. 8. pp. 2282-2287.
@article{180f37be18be49d7aa8ec3fa9aaca696,
title = "Influence of ballistic bench press on upper body power output in professional rugby players",
abstract = "The use of heavy resistance exercise provides an effective preload stimulus for inducing postactivation potentiation (PAP) and increasing peak power output (PPO). However, this approach has limited application in many sporting situations (e.g., incorporation in a precompetition warm-up); and therefore, more practical strategies for inducing PAP need to be investigated. The aim of the present study was to compare the PPO changes after performing a preload stimulus of either a ballistic exercise or a traditional heavy resistance exercise. Twenty professional rugby union players completed 3 testing sessions, each separated by 48 hours. On the first occasion, subjects underwent a 3 repetition maximum (3RM)-bench press testing session. On the next 2 occasions, subjects performed a ballistic bench throw at baseline (30{\%} of 1RM), followed by a preload stimulus of either heavy resistance training (HRT) (heavy bench press: 3 sets of 3 repetitions at 87{\%} 1RM) or BBP (3 sets of 3 repetitions at 30{\%} on 1RM) followed by ballistic bench throw after 8 minutes recovery. The trials were randomized and counterbalanced. Both preload stimuli protocols increased PPO compared with baseline (BBP baseline 892 ± 108 vs. 8 minutes 924 ± 119 W, p <0.001; HRT baseline 893 ± 104 vs. 8 minutes 931 ± 116 W; p , 0.001). There were no conditional differences between PPO at 8 minutes (p = 0.141); moreover, the change in PPO from baseline was also similar between conditions (BBP D + 33 ± 18; HRT D + 38 ± 21 W; p = 0.112). In conclusion, a ballistic exercise provided an effective method of inducing PAP and increasing upper-body PPO; moreover, this elicited similar increases in PPO as a traditional heavy resistance exercise preloading stimulus. {\circledC} 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association.",
keywords = "High-velocity, Postactivation potentiation, Preload stimulus",
author = "D.J. West and D.J. Cunningham and Crewther, {Blair T} and C.J. Cook and Kilduff, {Liam P}",
note = "Cited By :13 Export Date: 25 May 2017",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827de6f1",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "2282--2287",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "8",

}

Influence of ballistic bench press on upper body power output in professional rugby players. / West, D.J.; Cunningham, D.J.; Crewther, Blair T; Cook, C.J.; Kilduff, Liam P.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 27, No. 8, 2013, p. 2282-2287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of ballistic bench press on upper body power output in professional rugby players

AU - West, D.J.

AU - Cunningham, D.J.

AU - Crewther, Blair T

AU - Cook, C.J.

AU - Kilduff, Liam P

N1 - Cited By :13 Export Date: 25 May 2017

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The use of heavy resistance exercise provides an effective preload stimulus for inducing postactivation potentiation (PAP) and increasing peak power output (PPO). However, this approach has limited application in many sporting situations (e.g., incorporation in a precompetition warm-up); and therefore, more practical strategies for inducing PAP need to be investigated. The aim of the present study was to compare the PPO changes after performing a preload stimulus of either a ballistic exercise or a traditional heavy resistance exercise. Twenty professional rugby union players completed 3 testing sessions, each separated by 48 hours. On the first occasion, subjects underwent a 3 repetition maximum (3RM)-bench press testing session. On the next 2 occasions, subjects performed a ballistic bench throw at baseline (30% of 1RM), followed by a preload stimulus of either heavy resistance training (HRT) (heavy bench press: 3 sets of 3 repetitions at 87% 1RM) or BBP (3 sets of 3 repetitions at 30% on 1RM) followed by ballistic bench throw after 8 minutes recovery. The trials were randomized and counterbalanced. Both preload stimuli protocols increased PPO compared with baseline (BBP baseline 892 ± 108 vs. 8 minutes 924 ± 119 W, p <0.001; HRT baseline 893 ± 104 vs. 8 minutes 931 ± 116 W; p , 0.001). There were no conditional differences between PPO at 8 minutes (p = 0.141); moreover, the change in PPO from baseline was also similar between conditions (BBP D + 33 ± 18; HRT D + 38 ± 21 W; p = 0.112). In conclusion, a ballistic exercise provided an effective method of inducing PAP and increasing upper-body PPO; moreover, this elicited similar increases in PPO as a traditional heavy resistance exercise preloading stimulus. © 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

AB - The use of heavy resistance exercise provides an effective preload stimulus for inducing postactivation potentiation (PAP) and increasing peak power output (PPO). However, this approach has limited application in many sporting situations (e.g., incorporation in a precompetition warm-up); and therefore, more practical strategies for inducing PAP need to be investigated. The aim of the present study was to compare the PPO changes after performing a preload stimulus of either a ballistic exercise or a traditional heavy resistance exercise. Twenty professional rugby union players completed 3 testing sessions, each separated by 48 hours. On the first occasion, subjects underwent a 3 repetition maximum (3RM)-bench press testing session. On the next 2 occasions, subjects performed a ballistic bench throw at baseline (30% of 1RM), followed by a preload stimulus of either heavy resistance training (HRT) (heavy bench press: 3 sets of 3 repetitions at 87% 1RM) or BBP (3 sets of 3 repetitions at 30% on 1RM) followed by ballistic bench throw after 8 minutes recovery. The trials were randomized and counterbalanced. Both preload stimuli protocols increased PPO compared with baseline (BBP baseline 892 ± 108 vs. 8 minutes 924 ± 119 W, p <0.001; HRT baseline 893 ± 104 vs. 8 minutes 931 ± 116 W; p , 0.001). There were no conditional differences between PPO at 8 minutes (p = 0.141); moreover, the change in PPO from baseline was also similar between conditions (BBP D + 33 ± 18; HRT D + 38 ± 21 W; p = 0.112). In conclusion, a ballistic exercise provided an effective method of inducing PAP and increasing upper-body PPO; moreover, this elicited similar increases in PPO as a traditional heavy resistance exercise preloading stimulus. © 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

KW - High-velocity

KW - Postactivation potentiation

KW - Preload stimulus

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827de6f1

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827de6f1

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 2282

EP - 2287

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 8

ER -