Infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities – perceptions and expectations

Bikram Chatterjee, Monir MIR, Ian A Eddie, Victoria Wise

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to identify the contextual factors affecting infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities. Design/methodology/approach -The paper includes a survey and interview of Annual Report Recipients (ARRs) and Infrastructure Information Preparers (IIPs), together with an assessment of the extent of infrastructure information disclosure in the annual reports of New Zealand local authorities. Findings -This study finds that contrary to the expectations of Lüder's contingency model (1992), there is an information dissemination gap between the perceptions of ARRs and IIPs regarding infrastructure information reporting in the annual reports of New Zealand local authorities. This finding is consistent with decades of concern about the application of private sector Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to the public sector and the Controller and Auditor General's (CAG, 2009) concern about the inadequacy of private sector General Purpose Financial Reports in meeting public sector accountability. On the other hand, the study reports that the perceptions of the two groups, ARRs and IIPs, are similar with regard to the importance of infrastructure information items, which is consistent with the expectations of Lüder's model. Originality/value -The paper contributes towards theoretical development by adopting Lüder's (1992) contingency model in the context of infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities and proposing a model of contextual factors by extending Lüder's model. The practical contribution of the study is in the area of accounting practice and public policy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)36-57
    Number of pages22
    JournalAccounting Research Journal
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Local authorities
    New Zealand
    Information infrastructure
    Annual reports
    Contextual factors
    Contingency model
    Private sector
    Public sector
    Design methodology
    Controller
    Information disclosure
    Accountability
    Auditors
    Accounting practices
    Public policy
    Dissemination

    Cite this

    Chatterjee, Bikram ; MIR, Monir ; Eddie, Ian A ; Wise, Victoria . / Infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities – perceptions and expectations. In: Accounting Research Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 36-57.
    @article{7a9c21bede7e4626ae4744eec94680ef,
    title = "Infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities – perceptions and expectations",
    abstract = "Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to identify the contextual factors affecting infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities. Design/methodology/approach -The paper includes a survey and interview of Annual Report Recipients (ARRs) and Infrastructure Information Preparers (IIPs), together with an assessment of the extent of infrastructure information disclosure in the annual reports of New Zealand local authorities. Findings -This study finds that contrary to the expectations of L{\"u}der's contingency model (1992), there is an information dissemination gap between the perceptions of ARRs and IIPs regarding infrastructure information reporting in the annual reports of New Zealand local authorities. This finding is consistent with decades of concern about the application of private sector Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to the public sector and the Controller and Auditor General's (CAG, 2009) concern about the inadequacy of private sector General Purpose Financial Reports in meeting public sector accountability. On the other hand, the study reports that the perceptions of the two groups, ARRs and IIPs, are similar with regard to the importance of infrastructure information items, which is consistent with the expectations of L{\"u}der's model. Originality/value -The paper contributes towards theoretical development by adopting L{\"u}der's (1992) contingency model in the context of infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities and proposing a model of contextual factors by extending L{\"u}der's model. The practical contribution of the study is in the area of accounting practice and public policy.",
    keywords = "Infrastructure reporting, local authorities, New Zealand, Local authorities",
    author = "Bikram Chatterjee and Monir MIR and Eddie, {Ian A} and Victoria Wise",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1108/ARJ-10-2013-0076",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "36--57",
    journal = "Accounting Research Journal",
    issn = "1030-9616",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "1",

    }

    Infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities – perceptions and expectations. / Chatterjee, Bikram ; MIR, Monir; Eddie, Ian A ; Wise, Victoria .

    In: Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2017, p. 36-57.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities – perceptions and expectations

    AU - Chatterjee, Bikram

    AU - MIR, Monir

    AU - Eddie, Ian A

    AU - Wise, Victoria

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to identify the contextual factors affecting infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities. Design/methodology/approach -The paper includes a survey and interview of Annual Report Recipients (ARRs) and Infrastructure Information Preparers (IIPs), together with an assessment of the extent of infrastructure information disclosure in the annual reports of New Zealand local authorities. Findings -This study finds that contrary to the expectations of Lüder's contingency model (1992), there is an information dissemination gap between the perceptions of ARRs and IIPs regarding infrastructure information reporting in the annual reports of New Zealand local authorities. This finding is consistent with decades of concern about the application of private sector Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to the public sector and the Controller and Auditor General's (CAG, 2009) concern about the inadequacy of private sector General Purpose Financial Reports in meeting public sector accountability. On the other hand, the study reports that the perceptions of the two groups, ARRs and IIPs, are similar with regard to the importance of infrastructure information items, which is consistent with the expectations of Lüder's model. Originality/value -The paper contributes towards theoretical development by adopting Lüder's (1992) contingency model in the context of infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities and proposing a model of contextual factors by extending Lüder's model. The practical contribution of the study is in the area of accounting practice and public policy.

    AB - Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to identify the contextual factors affecting infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities. Design/methodology/approach -The paper includes a survey and interview of Annual Report Recipients (ARRs) and Infrastructure Information Preparers (IIPs), together with an assessment of the extent of infrastructure information disclosure in the annual reports of New Zealand local authorities. Findings -This study finds that contrary to the expectations of Lüder's contingency model (1992), there is an information dissemination gap between the perceptions of ARRs and IIPs regarding infrastructure information reporting in the annual reports of New Zealand local authorities. This finding is consistent with decades of concern about the application of private sector Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to the public sector and the Controller and Auditor General's (CAG, 2009) concern about the inadequacy of private sector General Purpose Financial Reports in meeting public sector accountability. On the other hand, the study reports that the perceptions of the two groups, ARRs and IIPs, are similar with regard to the importance of infrastructure information items, which is consistent with the expectations of Lüder's model. Originality/value -The paper contributes towards theoretical development by adopting Lüder's (1992) contingency model in the context of infrastructure reporting by New Zealand local authorities and proposing a model of contextual factors by extending Lüder's model. The practical contribution of the study is in the area of accounting practice and public policy.

    KW - Infrastructure reporting

    KW - local authorities

    KW - New Zealand

    KW - Local authorities

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021089240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/infrastructure-reporting-new-zealand-local-authorities-perceptions-expectations

    U2 - 10.1108/ARJ-10-2013-0076

    DO - 10.1108/ARJ-10-2013-0076

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 36

    EP - 57

    JO - Accounting Research Journal

    JF - Accounting Research Journal

    SN - 1030-9616

    IS - 1

    ER -