Injury prevention strategies specific to pre-elite athletes competing in Olympic and professional sports

A systematic review

Erin A. Smyth, Phillip Newman, Gordon Waddington, Juanita R. Weissensteiner, Michael K. Drew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To describe and evaluate injury prevention interventions for pre-elite athletes who compete in an Olympic or professional sport. Design: Systematic review. Methods: This review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42017065083) and a systematic electronic search was conducted in May 2017. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) studies including and analysing data specific to pre-elite athletes (determined by the T3/T4 levels of the FTEM model); (2) featured injury prevention interventions; (3) provided sufficient data related to injury such that the effect can be analysed e.g. injury rates, incidence, prevalence, injury rate ratios; (4) featured randomised and non-randomised controlled trials or prospective cohorts. Results: A total of 13,480 articles were retrieved with 121 titles identified and 11 studies satisfying the inclusion criteria. No studies demonstrated a low risk of bias. Four different interventions were identified: exercise (n = 7, 64%), psychological (n = 2, 18%), equipment (n = 1, 9%), nutrition (n = 1, 9%). Of the seven exercise interventions, four showed a protective effect and three found no significant effect, providing conflicting evidence. Caution is advised due to high risk of bias, low intervention reporting and minimal evidence for implementation planning in all seven studies. Conclusions: There is limited evidence from level 2 and 3 studies suggesting exercise and psychology interventions may prevent injury in pre-elite athletes. There is an absence of evidence to support the use of equipment and nutrition interventions in pre-elite athletes. There is a need for quality research designs confirming the clinical impact of existing injury prevention interventions for pre-elite athletes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)887-901
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume22
Issue number8
Early online date2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Athletes
Sports
Wounds and Injuries
Exercise
Psychology
Equipment and Supplies
Research Design
Incidence

Cite this

@article{a5000d59c23543c6924c73d9877a9d66,
title = "Injury prevention strategies specific to pre-elite athletes competing in Olympic and professional sports: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objectives: To describe and evaluate injury prevention interventions for pre-elite athletes who compete in an Olympic or professional sport. Design: Systematic review. Methods: This review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42017065083) and a systematic electronic search was conducted in May 2017. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) studies including and analysing data specific to pre-elite athletes (determined by the T3/T4 levels of the FTEM model); (2) featured injury prevention interventions; (3) provided sufficient data related to injury such that the effect can be analysed e.g. injury rates, incidence, prevalence, injury rate ratios; (4) featured randomised and non-randomised controlled trials or prospective cohorts. Results: A total of 13,480 articles were retrieved with 121 titles identified and 11 studies satisfying the inclusion criteria. No studies demonstrated a low risk of bias. Four different interventions were identified: exercise (n = 7, 64{\%}), psychological (n = 2, 18{\%}), equipment (n = 1, 9{\%}), nutrition (n = 1, 9{\%}). Of the seven exercise interventions, four showed a protective effect and three found no significant effect, providing conflicting evidence. Caution is advised due to high risk of bias, low intervention reporting and minimal evidence for implementation planning in all seven studies. Conclusions: There is limited evidence from level 2 and 3 studies suggesting exercise and psychology interventions may prevent injury in pre-elite athletes. There is an absence of evidence to support the use of equipment and nutrition interventions in pre-elite athletes. There is a need for quality research designs confirming the clinical impact of existing injury prevention interventions for pre-elite athletes.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Athletes, Athletic injuries, Prevention & control, Sports",
author = "Smyth, {Erin A.} and Phillip Newman and Gordon Waddington and Weissensteiner, {Juanita R.} and Drew, {Michael K.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2019.03.002",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "887--901",
journal = "Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "8",

}

Injury prevention strategies specific to pre-elite athletes competing in Olympic and professional sports : A systematic review. / Smyth, Erin A.; Newman, Phillip; Waddington, Gordon; Weissensteiner, Juanita R.; Drew, Michael K.

In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 22, No. 8, 08.2019, p. 887-901.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Injury prevention strategies specific to pre-elite athletes competing in Olympic and professional sports

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Smyth, Erin A.

AU - Newman, Phillip

AU - Waddington, Gordon

AU - Weissensteiner, Juanita R.

AU - Drew, Michael K.

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - Objectives: To describe and evaluate injury prevention interventions for pre-elite athletes who compete in an Olympic or professional sport. Design: Systematic review. Methods: This review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42017065083) and a systematic electronic search was conducted in May 2017. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) studies including and analysing data specific to pre-elite athletes (determined by the T3/T4 levels of the FTEM model); (2) featured injury prevention interventions; (3) provided sufficient data related to injury such that the effect can be analysed e.g. injury rates, incidence, prevalence, injury rate ratios; (4) featured randomised and non-randomised controlled trials or prospective cohorts. Results: A total of 13,480 articles were retrieved with 121 titles identified and 11 studies satisfying the inclusion criteria. No studies demonstrated a low risk of bias. Four different interventions were identified: exercise (n = 7, 64%), psychological (n = 2, 18%), equipment (n = 1, 9%), nutrition (n = 1, 9%). Of the seven exercise interventions, four showed a protective effect and three found no significant effect, providing conflicting evidence. Caution is advised due to high risk of bias, low intervention reporting and minimal evidence for implementation planning in all seven studies. Conclusions: There is limited evidence from level 2 and 3 studies suggesting exercise and psychology interventions may prevent injury in pre-elite athletes. There is an absence of evidence to support the use of equipment and nutrition interventions in pre-elite athletes. There is a need for quality research designs confirming the clinical impact of existing injury prevention interventions for pre-elite athletes.

AB - Objectives: To describe and evaluate injury prevention interventions for pre-elite athletes who compete in an Olympic or professional sport. Design: Systematic review. Methods: This review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42017065083) and a systematic electronic search was conducted in May 2017. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) studies including and analysing data specific to pre-elite athletes (determined by the T3/T4 levels of the FTEM model); (2) featured injury prevention interventions; (3) provided sufficient data related to injury such that the effect can be analysed e.g. injury rates, incidence, prevalence, injury rate ratios; (4) featured randomised and non-randomised controlled trials or prospective cohorts. Results: A total of 13,480 articles were retrieved with 121 titles identified and 11 studies satisfying the inclusion criteria. No studies demonstrated a low risk of bias. Four different interventions were identified: exercise (n = 7, 64%), psychological (n = 2, 18%), equipment (n = 1, 9%), nutrition (n = 1, 9%). Of the seven exercise interventions, four showed a protective effect and three found no significant effect, providing conflicting evidence. Caution is advised due to high risk of bias, low intervention reporting and minimal evidence for implementation planning in all seven studies. Conclusions: There is limited evidence from level 2 and 3 studies suggesting exercise and psychology interventions may prevent injury in pre-elite athletes. There is an absence of evidence to support the use of equipment and nutrition interventions in pre-elite athletes. There is a need for quality research designs confirming the clinical impact of existing injury prevention interventions for pre-elite athletes.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Athletes

KW - Athletic injuries

KW - Prevention & control

KW - Sports

UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.03.002

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/title-injury-prevention-strategies-specific-preelite-athletes-competing-olympic-professional-sportsa

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063442178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/injury-prevention-strategies-specific-preelite-athletes-competing-olympic-professional-sports-syste

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.03.002

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 887

EP - 901

JO - Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 8

ER -