Inspecting the emperor's clothes

Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance

S. Alexander Haslam, Craig McGarty, Patricia M. Brown, Rachael A. Eggins, Brenda E. Morrison, Katherine J. Reynolds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article tests the hypothesis that group performance might be superior when leaders are randomly rather than systematically selected. In Experiment 1 groups with randomly selected leaders performed a survival task better than groups whose leaders were systematically selected. This effect was replicated in Experiment 2: Groups with a random leader also performed better than groups with no appointed leader and followers adhered more strongly to the group decision. In Experiment 3, naive participants' experimental expectations confirmed the counterintuitive nature of these findings. Results suggest that systematically selected leaders can undermine group goals and group maintenance. The possibility that this occurs because leaders assert their personal superiority at the expense of shared social identity is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-184
Number of pages17
JournalGroup Dynamics
Volume2
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Identification
Clothing
Maintenance

Cite this

Haslam, S. A., McGarty, C., Brown, P. M., Eggins, R. A., Morrison, B. E., & Reynolds, K. J. (1998). Inspecting the emperor's clothes: Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance. Group Dynamics, 2(3), 168-184.
Haslam, S. Alexander ; McGarty, Craig ; Brown, Patricia M. ; Eggins, Rachael A. ; Morrison, Brenda E. ; Reynolds, Katherine J. / Inspecting the emperor's clothes : Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance. In: Group Dynamics. 1998 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 168-184.
@article{7d90ebe5d01a4362a67b66b31ee2af24,
title = "Inspecting the emperor's clothes: Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance",
abstract = "This article tests the hypothesis that group performance might be superior when leaders are randomly rather than systematically selected. In Experiment 1 groups with randomly selected leaders performed a survival task better than groups whose leaders were systematically selected. This effect was replicated in Experiment 2: Groups with a random leader also performed better than groups with no appointed leader and followers adhered more strongly to the group decision. In Experiment 3, naive participants' experimental expectations confirmed the counterintuitive nature of these findings. Results suggest that systematically selected leaders can undermine group goals and group maintenance. The possibility that this occurs because leaders assert their personal superiority at the expense of shared social identity is discussed.",
author = "Haslam, {S. Alexander} and Craig McGarty and Brown, {Patricia M.} and Eggins, {Rachael A.} and Morrison, {Brenda E.} and Reynolds, {Katherine J.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "168--184",
journal = "Group Dynamics",
issn = "1089-2699",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "3",

}

Haslam, SA, McGarty, C, Brown, PM, Eggins, RA, Morrison, BE & Reynolds, KJ 1998, 'Inspecting the emperor's clothes: Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance', Group Dynamics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 168-184.

Inspecting the emperor's clothes : Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance. / Haslam, S. Alexander; McGarty, Craig; Brown, Patricia M.; Eggins, Rachael A.; Morrison, Brenda E.; Reynolds, Katherine J.

In: Group Dynamics, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1998, p. 168-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inspecting the emperor's clothes

T2 - Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance

AU - Haslam, S. Alexander

AU - McGarty, Craig

AU - Brown, Patricia M.

AU - Eggins, Rachael A.

AU - Morrison, Brenda E.

AU - Reynolds, Katherine J.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This article tests the hypothesis that group performance might be superior when leaders are randomly rather than systematically selected. In Experiment 1 groups with randomly selected leaders performed a survival task better than groups whose leaders were systematically selected. This effect was replicated in Experiment 2: Groups with a random leader also performed better than groups with no appointed leader and followers adhered more strongly to the group decision. In Experiment 3, naive participants' experimental expectations confirmed the counterintuitive nature of these findings. Results suggest that systematically selected leaders can undermine group goals and group maintenance. The possibility that this occurs because leaders assert their personal superiority at the expense of shared social identity is discussed.

AB - This article tests the hypothesis that group performance might be superior when leaders are randomly rather than systematically selected. In Experiment 1 groups with randomly selected leaders performed a survival task better than groups whose leaders were systematically selected. This effect was replicated in Experiment 2: Groups with a random leader also performed better than groups with no appointed leader and followers adhered more strongly to the group decision. In Experiment 3, naive participants' experimental expectations confirmed the counterintuitive nature of these findings. Results suggest that systematically selected leaders can undermine group goals and group maintenance. The possibility that this occurs because leaders assert their personal superiority at the expense of shared social identity is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000945433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 168

EP - 184

JO - Group Dynamics

JF - Group Dynamics

SN - 1089-2699

IS - 3

ER -