Institutional autonomy revisited: autonomy justified and accounted

Ingrid Moses

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australian universities have enjoyed large-scale autonomy. In a society that increasingly regards university education from an instrumentalist point of view, universities' anxious safeguarding of their autonomy is widely seen as an attempt to evade accountability. Yet there has been an acceptance that a corollary to autonomy is accountability. Over the past 20 years, the boundaries of autonomy have changed and accountability requirements multiplied. This paper explores the developments in Australia within a wider international context. In particular, it notes changes in seven areas of institutional autonomy, staff, students, curriculum and teaching, academic standards, research and publications, governance, and administration and finance. It concludes that Australian universities have been responsive to societal expectations within the boundaries of changing institutional autonomy
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)261-274
    Number of pages14
    JournalHigher Education Policy
    Volume20
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional autonomy revisited: autonomy justified and accounted'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this