Institutional autonomy revisited: autonomy justified and accounted

Ingrid Moses

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australian universities have enjoyed large-scale autonomy. In a society that increasingly regards university education from an instrumentalist point of view, universities' anxious safeguarding of their autonomy is widely seen as an attempt to evade accountability. Yet there has been an acceptance that a corollary to autonomy is accountability. Over the past 20 years, the boundaries of autonomy have changed and accountability requirements multiplied. This paper explores the developments in Australia within a wider international context. In particular, it notes changes in seven areas of institutional autonomy, staff, students, curriculum and teaching, academic standards, research and publications, governance, and administration and finance. It concludes that Australian universities have been responsive to societal expectations within the boundaries of changing institutional autonomy
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)261-274
    Number of pages14
    JournalHigher Education Policy
    Volume20
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    autonomy
    responsibility
    university
    university education
    finance
    acceptance
    governance
    staff
    curriculum
    Teaching
    student

    Cite this

    Moses, Ingrid. / Institutional autonomy revisited: autonomy justified and accounted. In: Higher Education Policy. 2007 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 261-274.
    @article{952c42d86cad44deb7f4d21ba63746bc,
    title = "Institutional autonomy revisited: autonomy justified and accounted",
    abstract = "Australian universities have enjoyed large-scale autonomy. In a society that increasingly regards university education from an instrumentalist point of view, universities' anxious safeguarding of their autonomy is widely seen as an attempt to evade accountability. Yet there has been an acceptance that a corollary to autonomy is accountability. Over the past 20 years, the boundaries of autonomy have changed and accountability requirements multiplied. This paper explores the developments in Australia within a wider international context. In particular, it notes changes in seven areas of institutional autonomy, staff, students, curriculum and teaching, academic standards, research and publications, governance, and administration and finance. It concludes that Australian universities have been responsive to societal expectations within the boundaries of changing institutional autonomy",
    author = "Ingrid Moses",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300157",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "261--274",
    journal = "Higher Education Policy",
    issn = "0952-8733",
    publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
    number = "3",

    }

    Institutional autonomy revisited: autonomy justified and accounted. / Moses, Ingrid.

    In: Higher Education Policy, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2007, p. 261-274.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Institutional autonomy revisited: autonomy justified and accounted

    AU - Moses, Ingrid

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Australian universities have enjoyed large-scale autonomy. In a society that increasingly regards university education from an instrumentalist point of view, universities' anxious safeguarding of their autonomy is widely seen as an attempt to evade accountability. Yet there has been an acceptance that a corollary to autonomy is accountability. Over the past 20 years, the boundaries of autonomy have changed and accountability requirements multiplied. This paper explores the developments in Australia within a wider international context. In particular, it notes changes in seven areas of institutional autonomy, staff, students, curriculum and teaching, academic standards, research and publications, governance, and administration and finance. It concludes that Australian universities have been responsive to societal expectations within the boundaries of changing institutional autonomy

    AB - Australian universities have enjoyed large-scale autonomy. In a society that increasingly regards university education from an instrumentalist point of view, universities' anxious safeguarding of their autonomy is widely seen as an attempt to evade accountability. Yet there has been an acceptance that a corollary to autonomy is accountability. Over the past 20 years, the boundaries of autonomy have changed and accountability requirements multiplied. This paper explores the developments in Australia within a wider international context. In particular, it notes changes in seven areas of institutional autonomy, staff, students, curriculum and teaching, academic standards, research and publications, governance, and administration and finance. It concludes that Australian universities have been responsive to societal expectations within the boundaries of changing institutional autonomy

    U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300157

    DO - 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300157

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 261

    EP - 274

    JO - Higher Education Policy

    JF - Higher Education Policy

    SN - 0952-8733

    IS - 3

    ER -