Institutional policies on assessing group work: cautions, caveats and constraints

Peter Donnan

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contributionpeer-review

    54 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study investigates whether assessment policies in Australian universities promote sustainable and innovative group assessment practice. There is an acceptance of the critical importance of teamwork and collaborative learning, as well as the need to conduct assessment in this area with validity and reliability. The study is based on an analysis of thirty-nine assessment policies from Australian universities. Despite occasional policies that present a positive rationale and valuing of collaboration amongst students, proactive teaching around group dynamics, appropriate assessment design, institutional resources and staff support around group assessment, the overwhelming perspective is a preoccupation with the negative aspects of group assessment rather than its possibilities. In the process of policy analysis, positive drivers of sustainable and innovative assessment have been identified.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationATN Assessment Conference 2010: Assessment: Sustainability, Diversity and Innovation: a conference on assessment in higher education
    Place of PublicationSydney, Australia
    PublisherUniversity of Technology
    Pages1-9
    Number of pages9
    Publication statusPublished - 2010
    EventATN Assessment Conference 2010: Assessment: Sustainability, Diversity and Innovation: a conference on assessment in higher education - Sydney, Australia
    Duration: 18 Nov 201019 Nov 2010

    Conference

    ConferenceATN Assessment Conference 2010: Assessment: Sustainability, Diversity and Innovation: a conference on assessment in higher education
    Country/TerritoryAustralia
    CitySydney
    Period18/11/1019/11/10

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional policies on assessing group work: cautions, caveats and constraints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this