Integrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia

The 'wobbly hub and double spokes' project

Craig Veitch, Michelle Lincoln, Anita Bundy, Gisselle Gallego, Angela Dew, Kim Bulkeley, Jennie Brentnall, Scott Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Policy that supports rural allied health service delivery is important given the shortage of services outside of Australian metropolitan centres. The shortage of allied health professionals means that rural clinicians work long hours and have little peer or service support. Service delivery to rural and remote communities is further complicated because relatively small numbers of clients are dispersed over large geographic areas. The aim of this five-year multi-stage project is to generate evidence to confirm and develop evidence-based policies and to evaluate their implementation in procedures that allow a regional allied health workforce to more expeditiously respond to disability service need in regional New South Wales, Australia. Methods/Design. The project consists of four inter-related stages that together constitute a full policy cycle. It uses mixed quantitative and qualitative methods, guided by key policy concerns such as: access, complexity, cost, distribution of benefits, timeliness, effectiveness, equity, policy consistency, and community and political acceptability. Stage 1 adopts a policy analysis approach in which existing relevant policies and related documentation will be collected and reviewed. Policy-makers and senior managers within the region and in central offices will be interviewed about issues that influence policy development and implementation. Stage 2 uses a mixed methods approach to collecting information from allied health professionals, clients, and carers. Focus groups and interviews will explore issues related to providing and receiving allied health services. Discrete Choice Experiments will elicit staff and client/carer preferences. Stage 3 synthesises Stage 1 and 2 findings with reference to the key policy issues to develop and implement policies and procedures to establish several innovative regional workforce and service provision projects. Stage 4 uses mixed methods to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of new or adapted policies that arise from the preceding stages. Discussion. The project will provide policy makers with research evidence to support consideration of the complex balance between: (i) the equitable allocation of scarce resources; (ii) the intent of current eligibility and prioritisation policies; (iii) workforce constraints (and strengths); and (iv) the most effective, evidence-based clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number70
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume12
Issue number70
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

South Australia
New South Wales
Allied Health Personnel
Policy Making
Administrative Personnel
Caregivers
Rural Health Services
Health Manpower
Resource Allocation
Evidence-Based Practice
Rural Population
Focus Groups
Documentation
Health Services
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Interviews

Cite this

Veitch, Craig ; Lincoln, Michelle ; Bundy, Anita ; Gallego, Gisselle ; Dew, Angela ; Bulkeley, Kim ; Brentnall, Jennie ; Griffiths, Scott. / Integrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia : The 'wobbly hub and double spokes' project. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 70. pp. 1-8.
@article{e417a2f182364974a05862744ae75a8f,
title = "Integrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia: The 'wobbly hub and double spokes' project",
abstract = "Background: Policy that supports rural allied health service delivery is important given the shortage of services outside of Australian metropolitan centres. The shortage of allied health professionals means that rural clinicians work long hours and have little peer or service support. Service delivery to rural and remote communities is further complicated because relatively small numbers of clients are dispersed over large geographic areas. The aim of this five-year multi-stage project is to generate evidence to confirm and develop evidence-based policies and to evaluate their implementation in procedures that allow a regional allied health workforce to more expeditiously respond to disability service need in regional New South Wales, Australia. Methods/Design. The project consists of four inter-related stages that together constitute a full policy cycle. It uses mixed quantitative and qualitative methods, guided by key policy concerns such as: access, complexity, cost, distribution of benefits, timeliness, effectiveness, equity, policy consistency, and community and political acceptability. Stage 1 adopts a policy analysis approach in which existing relevant policies and related documentation will be collected and reviewed. Policy-makers and senior managers within the region and in central offices will be interviewed about issues that influence policy development and implementation. Stage 2 uses a mixed methods approach to collecting information from allied health professionals, clients, and carers. Focus groups and interviews will explore issues related to providing and receiving allied health services. Discrete Choice Experiments will elicit staff and client/carer preferences. Stage 3 synthesises Stage 1 and 2 findings with reference to the key policy issues to develop and implement policies and procedures to establish several innovative regional workforce and service provision projects. Stage 4 uses mixed methods to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of new or adapted policies that arise from the preceding stages. Discussion. The project will provide policy makers with research evidence to support consideration of the complex balance between: (i) the equitable allocation of scarce resources; (ii) the intent of current eligibility and prioritisation policies; (iii) workforce constraints (and strengths); and (iv) the most effective, evidence-based clinical practice.",
keywords = "Access, Allied health, Disability, Policy, Regional, Remote, Retention, Rural, Service provision, Workforce",
author = "Craig Veitch and Michelle Lincoln and Anita Bundy and Gisselle Gallego and Angela Dew and Kim Bulkeley and Jennie Brentnall and Scott Griffiths",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-12-70",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "70",

}

Integrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia : The 'wobbly hub and double spokes' project. / Veitch, Craig; Lincoln, Michelle; Bundy, Anita; Gallego, Gisselle; Dew, Angela; Bulkeley, Kim; Brentnall, Jennie; Griffiths, Scott.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 12, No. 70, 70, 22.03.2012, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia

T2 - The 'wobbly hub and double spokes' project

AU - Veitch, Craig

AU - Lincoln, Michelle

AU - Bundy, Anita

AU - Gallego, Gisselle

AU - Dew, Angela

AU - Bulkeley, Kim

AU - Brentnall, Jennie

AU - Griffiths, Scott

PY - 2012/3/22

Y1 - 2012/3/22

N2 - Background: Policy that supports rural allied health service delivery is important given the shortage of services outside of Australian metropolitan centres. The shortage of allied health professionals means that rural clinicians work long hours and have little peer or service support. Service delivery to rural and remote communities is further complicated because relatively small numbers of clients are dispersed over large geographic areas. The aim of this five-year multi-stage project is to generate evidence to confirm and develop evidence-based policies and to evaluate their implementation in procedures that allow a regional allied health workforce to more expeditiously respond to disability service need in regional New South Wales, Australia. Methods/Design. The project consists of four inter-related stages that together constitute a full policy cycle. It uses mixed quantitative and qualitative methods, guided by key policy concerns such as: access, complexity, cost, distribution of benefits, timeliness, effectiveness, equity, policy consistency, and community and political acceptability. Stage 1 adopts a policy analysis approach in which existing relevant policies and related documentation will be collected and reviewed. Policy-makers and senior managers within the region and in central offices will be interviewed about issues that influence policy development and implementation. Stage 2 uses a mixed methods approach to collecting information from allied health professionals, clients, and carers. Focus groups and interviews will explore issues related to providing and receiving allied health services. Discrete Choice Experiments will elicit staff and client/carer preferences. Stage 3 synthesises Stage 1 and 2 findings with reference to the key policy issues to develop and implement policies and procedures to establish several innovative regional workforce and service provision projects. Stage 4 uses mixed methods to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of new or adapted policies that arise from the preceding stages. Discussion. The project will provide policy makers with research evidence to support consideration of the complex balance between: (i) the equitable allocation of scarce resources; (ii) the intent of current eligibility and prioritisation policies; (iii) workforce constraints (and strengths); and (iv) the most effective, evidence-based clinical practice.

AB - Background: Policy that supports rural allied health service delivery is important given the shortage of services outside of Australian metropolitan centres. The shortage of allied health professionals means that rural clinicians work long hours and have little peer or service support. Service delivery to rural and remote communities is further complicated because relatively small numbers of clients are dispersed over large geographic areas. The aim of this five-year multi-stage project is to generate evidence to confirm and develop evidence-based policies and to evaluate their implementation in procedures that allow a regional allied health workforce to more expeditiously respond to disability service need in regional New South Wales, Australia. Methods/Design. The project consists of four inter-related stages that together constitute a full policy cycle. It uses mixed quantitative and qualitative methods, guided by key policy concerns such as: access, complexity, cost, distribution of benefits, timeliness, effectiveness, equity, policy consistency, and community and political acceptability. Stage 1 adopts a policy analysis approach in which existing relevant policies and related documentation will be collected and reviewed. Policy-makers and senior managers within the region and in central offices will be interviewed about issues that influence policy development and implementation. Stage 2 uses a mixed methods approach to collecting information from allied health professionals, clients, and carers. Focus groups and interviews will explore issues related to providing and receiving allied health services. Discrete Choice Experiments will elicit staff and client/carer preferences. Stage 3 synthesises Stage 1 and 2 findings with reference to the key policy issues to develop and implement policies and procedures to establish several innovative regional workforce and service provision projects. Stage 4 uses mixed methods to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of new or adapted policies that arise from the preceding stages. Discussion. The project will provide policy makers with research evidence to support consideration of the complex balance between: (i) the equitable allocation of scarce resources; (ii) the intent of current eligibility and prioritisation policies; (iii) workforce constraints (and strengths); and (iv) the most effective, evidence-based clinical practice.

KW - Access

KW - Allied health

KW - Disability

KW - Policy

KW - Regional

KW - Remote

KW - Retention

KW - Rural

KW - Service provision

KW - Workforce

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858611536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-12-70

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-12-70

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 70

M1 - 70

ER -