INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The field of intergovernmental relations has been strongly affected by the considerable processes of upheaval and change that have been experienced within the British system of central‐local relations. Researchers have tried to understand these changes both at an empirical and theoretical level. This article reviews four of the main perspectives on the changing nature of intergovernmental relations. The first perspective provides a historical and institutional analysis within the tradition of public administration. The second perspective draws on organizational theory. The third develops insights through rational choice analysis. The final perspective draws on neo‐Marxist influenced state theory. It can be concluded that in a search to understand the turmoil of recent years, students of intergovernmental relations have ranged far and wide in their theoretical concerns. The article closes with an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-122
Number of pages22
JournalPublic Administration
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public administration
student

Cite this

STOKER, GERRY. / INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS. In: Public Administration. 1995 ; Vol. 73, No. 1. pp. 101-122.
@article{910606c090374444bfb66918cea73066,
title = "INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS",
abstract = "The field of intergovernmental relations has been strongly affected by the considerable processes of upheaval and change that have been experienced within the British system of central‐local relations. Researchers have tried to understand these changes both at an empirical and theoretical level. This article reviews four of the main perspectives on the changing nature of intergovernmental relations. The first perspective provides a historical and institutional analysis within the tradition of public administration. The second perspective draws on organizational theory. The third develops insights through rational choice analysis. The final perspective draws on neo‐Marxist influenced state theory. It can be concluded that in a search to understand the turmoil of recent years, students of intergovernmental relations have ranged far and wide in their theoretical concerns. The article closes with an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.",
author = "GERRY STOKER",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00819.x",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "101--122",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS. / STOKER, GERRY.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 73, No. 1, 1995, p. 101-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

AU - STOKER, GERRY

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The field of intergovernmental relations has been strongly affected by the considerable processes of upheaval and change that have been experienced within the British system of central‐local relations. Researchers have tried to understand these changes both at an empirical and theoretical level. This article reviews four of the main perspectives on the changing nature of intergovernmental relations. The first perspective provides a historical and institutional analysis within the tradition of public administration. The second perspective draws on organizational theory. The third develops insights through rational choice analysis. The final perspective draws on neo‐Marxist influenced state theory. It can be concluded that in a search to understand the turmoil of recent years, students of intergovernmental relations have ranged far and wide in their theoretical concerns. The article closes with an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

AB - The field of intergovernmental relations has been strongly affected by the considerable processes of upheaval and change that have been experienced within the British system of central‐local relations. Researchers have tried to understand these changes both at an empirical and theoretical level. This article reviews four of the main perspectives on the changing nature of intergovernmental relations. The first perspective provides a historical and institutional analysis within the tradition of public administration. The second perspective draws on organizational theory. The third develops insights through rational choice analysis. The final perspective draws on neo‐Marxist influenced state theory. It can be concluded that in a search to understand the turmoil of recent years, students of intergovernmental relations have ranged far and wide in their theoretical concerns. The article closes with an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982684072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00819.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00819.x

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 101

EP - 122

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 1

ER -