Intergroup evaluations, group indispensability and prototypicality judgments

A study in Mauritius

Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong, Maykel Verkuyten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the superordinate (national)-subgroup (ethnic) association in relation to group identifications, relative ingroup indispensability, relative ingroup prototypicality and their effects on outgroup and ingroup evaluations. Survey data were collected from a large sample of Mauritian adolescents (N = 1,784) from three ethnic groups (Hindus, Muslims, Creoles). National and dual identifiers were more positive towards the outgroups than ethnic identifiers. Furthermore, relative ingroup prototypicality and relative ingroup indispensability were empirically distinguishable constructs. The Creoles, who are of lower status, had higher scores on both these measures. Also it turned out that relative ingroup indispensability and relative ingroup prototypicality were independently associated to respectively more negative outgroup evaluation and more positive ingroup evaluation. The findings give a differentiated view of the idea that a complex representation of the superordinate category fosters outgroup acceptance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)621-638
Number of pages18
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Volume13
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mauritius
outgroup
evaluation
Islam
Social Identification
Group
Ethnic Groups
Muslim
ethnic group
acceptance
adolescent
Prototypicality
Evaluation

Cite this

@article{c52f045c1d804203943809c5c2a4033f,
title = "Intergroup evaluations, group indispensability and prototypicality judgments: A study in Mauritius",
abstract = "This paper focuses on the superordinate (national)-subgroup (ethnic) association in relation to group identifications, relative ingroup indispensability, relative ingroup prototypicality and their effects on outgroup and ingroup evaluations. Survey data were collected from a large sample of Mauritian adolescents (N = 1,784) from three ethnic groups (Hindus, Muslims, Creoles). National and dual identifiers were more positive towards the outgroups than ethnic identifiers. Furthermore, relative ingroup prototypicality and relative ingroup indispensability were empirically distinguishable constructs. The Creoles, who are of lower status, had higher scores on both these measures. Also it turned out that relative ingroup indispensability and relative ingroup prototypicality were independently associated to respectively more negative outgroup evaluation and more positive ingroup evaluation. The findings give a differentiated view of the idea that a complex representation of the superordinate category fosters outgroup acceptance.",
author = "{Ng Tseung-Wong}, Caroline and Maykel Verkuyten",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "621--638",
journal = "Group Processes and Intergroup Relations",
issn = "1368-4302",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Intergroup evaluations, group indispensability and prototypicality judgments : A study in Mauritius. / Ng Tseung-Wong, Caroline; Verkuyten, Maykel.

In: Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2010, p. 621-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intergroup evaluations, group indispensability and prototypicality judgments

T2 - A study in Mauritius

AU - Ng Tseung-Wong, Caroline

AU - Verkuyten, Maykel

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This paper focuses on the superordinate (national)-subgroup (ethnic) association in relation to group identifications, relative ingroup indispensability, relative ingroup prototypicality and their effects on outgroup and ingroup evaluations. Survey data were collected from a large sample of Mauritian adolescents (N = 1,784) from three ethnic groups (Hindus, Muslims, Creoles). National and dual identifiers were more positive towards the outgroups than ethnic identifiers. Furthermore, relative ingroup prototypicality and relative ingroup indispensability were empirically distinguishable constructs. The Creoles, who are of lower status, had higher scores on both these measures. Also it turned out that relative ingroup indispensability and relative ingroup prototypicality were independently associated to respectively more negative outgroup evaluation and more positive ingroup evaluation. The findings give a differentiated view of the idea that a complex representation of the superordinate category fosters outgroup acceptance.

AB - This paper focuses on the superordinate (national)-subgroup (ethnic) association in relation to group identifications, relative ingroup indispensability, relative ingroup prototypicality and their effects on outgroup and ingroup evaluations. Survey data were collected from a large sample of Mauritian adolescents (N = 1,784) from three ethnic groups (Hindus, Muslims, Creoles). National and dual identifiers were more positive towards the outgroups than ethnic identifiers. Furthermore, relative ingroup prototypicality and relative ingroup indispensability were empirically distinguishable constructs. The Creoles, who are of lower status, had higher scores on both these measures. Also it turned out that relative ingroup indispensability and relative ingroup prototypicality were independently associated to respectively more negative outgroup evaluation and more positive ingroup evaluation. The findings give a differentiated view of the idea that a complex representation of the superordinate category fosters outgroup acceptance.

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 621

EP - 638

JO - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

JF - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

SN - 1368-4302

IS - 5

ER -