TY - JOUR
T1 - Interprofessional Collaboration and Team Effectiveness of Pharmacists in General Practice
T2 - a Cross-National Survey
AU - Sudeshika, Thilini
AU - Naunton, Mark
AU - Peterson, Gregory M
AU - Deeks, Louise S
AU - Guénette, Line
AU - Sharma, Ravi
AU - Freeman, Christopher
AU - Niyonsenga, Theo
AU - Kosari, Sam
N1 - Funding Information:
Pharmacists have been integrated into Canadian family practices, aiming to improve medication therapy using a collaborative care model. The integration of pharmacists into family practice teams was initiated as a large-scale demonstration project [,]. This project was supported by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care through the Primary Health Care Transition Fund between 2004 and 2006 []. It is estimated that around 700 pharmacists currently work in family practices across Canada []. Provincial and federal government health ministries are supporting the expansion of the co-location of pharmacists in Canadian family practice teams. As a result, most pharmacists in family practice teams are funded by provincial government health authorities []. Moreover, Canadian pharmacists have been granted some degree of prescribing rights based on the regulations of the various provinces []. Their roles in family practices include performing medication reviews and assessments; developing therapeutic plans with family physicians and patients; and providing education to patients and healthcare professionals []. There is an increasing evidence base that shows the advantages of the integration of pharmacists into Canadian family practices [,,,,].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - As team-based care continues to evolve, pharmacists have been included in general practice teams in many countries, to varying extents, to improve medication use and patient safety. However, evidence on interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness of pharmacists in general practice is sparse. This study aimed to compare the extent of interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness of general practice pharmacists in Australia with international sites (Canada and the UK), and identify the factors associated with interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness. General practice pharmacists from Australia, Canada, and the UK were identified through professional organisations and networks, and invited to participate in an online survey, adapted from existing validated tools. The survey explored interprofessional collaboration through four sub-domains (professional interactions, relationship initiation, trust and role clarity, and commitment to collaboration) and team effectiveness of general practice pharmacists. Of the 101 respondents (26 from Australia, 44 from Canada and 31 from the UK), 79% were female and 78% were aged below 50 years. Interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness appeared to be high and similar between countries. Total scores for collaboration of pharmacists were 86.1 ± 7.4 in Australia, 88.5 ± 7.5 in the UK, and 89.1 ± 7.3 in Canada (mean ± SD, where higher scores represent more advanced collaboration), while the team effectiveness scores of the pharmacists were 88.6 ± 14.6 in Canada, 91.8 ± 14.6 in Australia and 97.5 ± 14.0 in the UK. Pharmacists who had worked in general practice for a longer time showed advanced interprofessional collaboration while those who worked exclusively in general practice had higher scores for team effectiveness. Overall, general practice pharmacists in the three countries were highly collaborative with general practitioners. Long-term employment and longer work hours could enhance interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness in general practice pharmacists by improving trust and working relationships over time.
AB - As team-based care continues to evolve, pharmacists have been included in general practice teams in many countries, to varying extents, to improve medication use and patient safety. However, evidence on interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness of pharmacists in general practice is sparse. This study aimed to compare the extent of interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness of general practice pharmacists in Australia with international sites (Canada and the UK), and identify the factors associated with interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness. General practice pharmacists from Australia, Canada, and the UK were identified through professional organisations and networks, and invited to participate in an online survey, adapted from existing validated tools. The survey explored interprofessional collaboration through four sub-domains (professional interactions, relationship initiation, trust and role clarity, and commitment to collaboration) and team effectiveness of general practice pharmacists. Of the 101 respondents (26 from Australia, 44 from Canada and 31 from the UK), 79% were female and 78% were aged below 50 years. Interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness appeared to be high and similar between countries. Total scores for collaboration of pharmacists were 86.1 ± 7.4 in Australia, 88.5 ± 7.5 in the UK, and 89.1 ± 7.3 in Canada (mean ± SD, where higher scores represent more advanced collaboration), while the team effectiveness scores of the pharmacists were 88.6 ± 14.6 in Canada, 91.8 ± 14.6 in Australia and 97.5 ± 14.0 in the UK. Pharmacists who had worked in general practice for a longer time showed advanced interprofessional collaboration while those who worked exclusively in general practice had higher scores for team effectiveness. Overall, general practice pharmacists in the three countries were highly collaborative with general practitioners. Long-term employment and longer work hours could enhance interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness in general practice pharmacists by improving trust and working relationships over time.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Aged
KW - Male
KW - Pharmacists
KW - Interprofessional Relations
KW - Attitude of Health Personnel
KW - Cooperative Behavior
KW - General Practice
KW - Patient Care Team
KW - pharmacist
KW - cross-national survey
KW - interprofessional collaboration
KW - team effectiveness
KW - general practice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145964940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph20010394
DO - 10.3390/ijerph20010394
M3 - Article
C2 - 36612716
SN - 1660-4601
VL - 20
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 1
M1 - 394
ER -