Interventions for acute stroke management in Africa

a systematic review of the evidence

Leonard Baatiema, Carina K.Y. Chan, Adem Sav, Shawn Somerset

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The past decades have witnessed a rapid evolution of research on evidence-based acute stroke care interventions worldwide. Nonetheless, the evidence-to-practice gap in acute stroke care remains variable with slow and inconsistent uptake in low-middle income countries (LMICs). This review aims to identify and compare evidence-based acute stroke management interventions with alternative care on overall patient mortality and morbidity outcomes, functional independence, and length of hospital stay across Africa.

METHODS: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. An electronic search was conducted in six databases comprising MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library for experimental and non-experimental studies. Eligible studies were abstracted into evidence tables and their methodological quality appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data were analysed and presented narratively with reference to observed differences in patient outcomes, reporting p values and confidence intervals for any possible relationship.

RESULTS: Initially, 1896 articles were identified and 37 fully screened. Four non-experimental studies (three cohort and one case series studies) were included in the final review. One study focused on the clinical efficacy of a stroke unit whilst the remaining three reported on thrombolytic therapy. The results demonstrated a reduction in patient deaths attributed to stroke unit care and thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy was also associated with reductions in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (SICH). However, the limited eligible studies and methodological limitations compromised definitive conclusions on the extent of and level of efficacy of evidence-based acute stroke care interventions across Africa.

CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review confirms the widespread assertion of low applicability and uptake of evidence-based acute stroke care in LMICs. Despite the limited eligible studies, the overall positive patient outcomes following such interventions demonstrate the applicability and value of evidence-based acute stroke care interventions in Africa. Health policy attention is thus required to ensure widespread applicability of such interventions for improved patients' outcomes. The review findings also emphasises the need for further research to unravel the reasons for low uptake.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016051566.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stroke
Thrombolytic Therapy
Length of Stay
Cerebral Hemorrhage
Health Policy
Checklist
Research
MEDLINE
Libraries
Meta-Analysis
Nursing
Cohort Studies
Databases
Guidelines
Confidence Intervals
Morbidity
Mortality
Health

Cite this

Baatiema, Leonard ; Chan, Carina K.Y. ; Sav, Adem ; Somerset, Shawn. / Interventions for acute stroke management in Africa : a systematic review of the evidence. In: Systematic Reviews. 2017 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 1-12.
@article{8f822655ff72433b89d328cd920fa9fe,
title = "Interventions for acute stroke management in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The past decades have witnessed a rapid evolution of research on evidence-based acute stroke care interventions worldwide. Nonetheless, the evidence-to-practice gap in acute stroke care remains variable with slow and inconsistent uptake in low-middle income countries (LMICs). This review aims to identify and compare evidence-based acute stroke management interventions with alternative care on overall patient mortality and morbidity outcomes, functional independence, and length of hospital stay across Africa.METHODS: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. An electronic search was conducted in six databases comprising MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library for experimental and non-experimental studies. Eligible studies were abstracted into evidence tables and their methodological quality appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data were analysed and presented narratively with reference to observed differences in patient outcomes, reporting p values and confidence intervals for any possible relationship.RESULTS: Initially, 1896 articles were identified and 37 fully screened. Four non-experimental studies (three cohort and one case series studies) were included in the final review. One study focused on the clinical efficacy of a stroke unit whilst the remaining three reported on thrombolytic therapy. The results demonstrated a reduction in patient deaths attributed to stroke unit care and thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy was also associated with reductions in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (SICH). However, the limited eligible studies and methodological limitations compromised definitive conclusions on the extent of and level of efficacy of evidence-based acute stroke care interventions across Africa.CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review confirms the widespread assertion of low applicability and uptake of evidence-based acute stroke care in LMICs. Despite the limited eligible studies, the overall positive patient outcomes following such interventions demonstrate the applicability and value of evidence-based acute stroke care interventions in Africa. Health policy attention is thus required to ensure widespread applicability of such interventions for improved patients' outcomes. The review findings also emphasises the need for further research to unravel the reasons for low uptake.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016051566.",
keywords = "Africa, Evidence-based practice, Implementation, Organised care, Stroke, Stroke service",
author = "Leonard Baatiema and Chan, {Carina K.Y.} and Adem Sav and Shawn Somerset",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1186/s13643-017-0594-4",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Systematic Reviews",
issn = "2046-4053",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Interventions for acute stroke management in Africa : a systematic review of the evidence. / Baatiema, Leonard; Chan, Carina K.Y.; Sav, Adem; Somerset, Shawn.

In: Systematic Reviews, Vol. 6, No. 1, 24.10.2017, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interventions for acute stroke management in Africa

T2 - a systematic review of the evidence

AU - Baatiema, Leonard

AU - Chan, Carina K.Y.

AU - Sav, Adem

AU - Somerset, Shawn

PY - 2017/10/24

Y1 - 2017/10/24

N2 - BACKGROUND: The past decades have witnessed a rapid evolution of research on evidence-based acute stroke care interventions worldwide. Nonetheless, the evidence-to-practice gap in acute stroke care remains variable with slow and inconsistent uptake in low-middle income countries (LMICs). This review aims to identify and compare evidence-based acute stroke management interventions with alternative care on overall patient mortality and morbidity outcomes, functional independence, and length of hospital stay across Africa.METHODS: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. An electronic search was conducted in six databases comprising MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library for experimental and non-experimental studies. Eligible studies were abstracted into evidence tables and their methodological quality appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data were analysed and presented narratively with reference to observed differences in patient outcomes, reporting p values and confidence intervals for any possible relationship.RESULTS: Initially, 1896 articles were identified and 37 fully screened. Four non-experimental studies (three cohort and one case series studies) were included in the final review. One study focused on the clinical efficacy of a stroke unit whilst the remaining three reported on thrombolytic therapy. The results demonstrated a reduction in patient deaths attributed to stroke unit care and thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy was also associated with reductions in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (SICH). However, the limited eligible studies and methodological limitations compromised definitive conclusions on the extent of and level of efficacy of evidence-based acute stroke care interventions across Africa.CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review confirms the widespread assertion of low applicability and uptake of evidence-based acute stroke care in LMICs. Despite the limited eligible studies, the overall positive patient outcomes following such interventions demonstrate the applicability and value of evidence-based acute stroke care interventions in Africa. Health policy attention is thus required to ensure widespread applicability of such interventions for improved patients' outcomes. The review findings also emphasises the need for further research to unravel the reasons for low uptake.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016051566.

AB - BACKGROUND: The past decades have witnessed a rapid evolution of research on evidence-based acute stroke care interventions worldwide. Nonetheless, the evidence-to-practice gap in acute stroke care remains variable with slow and inconsistent uptake in low-middle income countries (LMICs). This review aims to identify and compare evidence-based acute stroke management interventions with alternative care on overall patient mortality and morbidity outcomes, functional independence, and length of hospital stay across Africa.METHODS: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. An electronic search was conducted in six databases comprising MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library for experimental and non-experimental studies. Eligible studies were abstracted into evidence tables and their methodological quality appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data were analysed and presented narratively with reference to observed differences in patient outcomes, reporting p values and confidence intervals for any possible relationship.RESULTS: Initially, 1896 articles were identified and 37 fully screened. Four non-experimental studies (three cohort and one case series studies) were included in the final review. One study focused on the clinical efficacy of a stroke unit whilst the remaining three reported on thrombolytic therapy. The results demonstrated a reduction in patient deaths attributed to stroke unit care and thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy was also associated with reductions in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (SICH). However, the limited eligible studies and methodological limitations compromised definitive conclusions on the extent of and level of efficacy of evidence-based acute stroke care interventions across Africa.CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review confirms the widespread assertion of low applicability and uptake of evidence-based acute stroke care in LMICs. Despite the limited eligible studies, the overall positive patient outcomes following such interventions demonstrate the applicability and value of evidence-based acute stroke care interventions in Africa. Health policy attention is thus required to ensure widespread applicability of such interventions for improved patients' outcomes. The review findings also emphasises the need for further research to unravel the reasons for low uptake.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016051566.

KW - Africa

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Implementation

KW - Organised care

KW - Stroke

KW - Stroke service

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050639662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13643-017-0594-4

DO - 10.1186/s13643-017-0594-4

M3 - Review article

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Systematic Reviews

JF - Systematic Reviews

SN - 2046-4053

IS - 1

ER -