Introductory Note

Jonathan Pickering, Steve Vanderheiden

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Recent developments in climate policy have done little to suggest that the world is acting quickly enough to avoid a dangerous rise in global temperatures. Despite some important steps in national policy-making—including the commencement of Australia’s carbon pricing mechanism and the piloting of subnational emissions trading in China—the polarized nature of the climate debate in the United States continues to obstruct progress. Moreover, a substantial gap remains between the current policies of various countries and the level of mitigation needed to stay within the internationally agreed limit of a 2 degrees Celsius rise in global temperature. To some observers, the United Nations climate change conference in Durban in 2011 offered hope for a long-term agreement that would be more inclusive than the Kyoto Protocol by securing the participation of major developing countries, such as India and China (which do not having binding mitigation commitments under the protocol), as well as developed countries, such as the United States (which failed to ratify the protocol). Yet, as it becomes increasingly clear that global emissions will need to peak within the next few years if we are to stem global warming, a dramatic change in short-term policies is also required
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)421-422
Number of pages2
JournalEthics International Affairs
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

failed state
emissions trading
climate policy
Kyoto Protocol
pricing
UNO
climate change
developing country
climate
commitment
India
China
participation
Mitigation
Temperature
Climate

Cite this

Pickering, Jonathan ; Vanderheiden, Steve. / Introductory Note. In: Ethics International Affairs. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 421-422.
@article{316fdff61aac4655bbd89fc2caf265fc,
title = "Introductory Note",
abstract = "Recent developments in climate policy have done little to suggest that the world is acting quickly enough to avoid a dangerous rise in global temperatures. Despite some important steps in national policy-making—including the commencement of Australia’s carbon pricing mechanism and the piloting of subnational emissions trading in China—the polarized nature of the climate debate in the United States continues to obstruct progress. Moreover, a substantial gap remains between the current policies of various countries and the level of mitigation needed to stay within the internationally agreed limit of a 2 degrees Celsius rise in global temperature. To some observers, the United Nations climate change conference in Durban in 2011 offered hope for a long-term agreement that would be more inclusive than the Kyoto Protocol by securing the participation of major developing countries, such as India and China (which do not having binding mitigation commitments under the protocol), as well as developed countries, such as the United States (which failed to ratify the protocol). Yet, as it becomes increasingly clear that global emissions will need to peak within the next few years if we are to stem global warming, a dramatic change in short-term policies is also required",
author = "Jonathan Pickering and Steve Vanderheiden",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1017/S0892679412000597",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "421--422",
journal = "Ethics International Affairs",
issn = "0892-6794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Introductory Note. / Pickering, Jonathan; Vanderheiden, Steve.

In: Ethics International Affairs, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2012, p. 421-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introductory Note

AU - Pickering, Jonathan

AU - Vanderheiden, Steve

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Recent developments in climate policy have done little to suggest that the world is acting quickly enough to avoid a dangerous rise in global temperatures. Despite some important steps in national policy-making—including the commencement of Australia’s carbon pricing mechanism and the piloting of subnational emissions trading in China—the polarized nature of the climate debate in the United States continues to obstruct progress. Moreover, a substantial gap remains between the current policies of various countries and the level of mitigation needed to stay within the internationally agreed limit of a 2 degrees Celsius rise in global temperature. To some observers, the United Nations climate change conference in Durban in 2011 offered hope for a long-term agreement that would be more inclusive than the Kyoto Protocol by securing the participation of major developing countries, such as India and China (which do not having binding mitigation commitments under the protocol), as well as developed countries, such as the United States (which failed to ratify the protocol). Yet, as it becomes increasingly clear that global emissions will need to peak within the next few years if we are to stem global warming, a dramatic change in short-term policies is also required

AB - Recent developments in climate policy have done little to suggest that the world is acting quickly enough to avoid a dangerous rise in global temperatures. Despite some important steps in national policy-making—including the commencement of Australia’s carbon pricing mechanism and the piloting of subnational emissions trading in China—the polarized nature of the climate debate in the United States continues to obstruct progress. Moreover, a substantial gap remains between the current policies of various countries and the level of mitigation needed to stay within the internationally agreed limit of a 2 degrees Celsius rise in global temperature. To some observers, the United Nations climate change conference in Durban in 2011 offered hope for a long-term agreement that would be more inclusive than the Kyoto Protocol by securing the participation of major developing countries, such as India and China (which do not having binding mitigation commitments under the protocol), as well as developed countries, such as the United States (which failed to ratify the protocol). Yet, as it becomes increasingly clear that global emissions will need to peak within the next few years if we are to stem global warming, a dramatic change in short-term policies is also required

U2 - 10.1017/S0892679412000597

DO - 10.1017/S0892679412000597

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 26

SP - 421

EP - 422

JO - Ethics International Affairs

JF - Ethics International Affairs

SN - 0892-6794

IS - 4

ER -