is E-Democracy a Myth? Civic Participation and Democratic Reform

Julie FREEMAN, Sharna Quirke

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    Abstract

    Information and communication technologies (ICTs) offer opportunities for greater civic participation in democratic reform. Government ICT use has, however, predominantly been associated with e-government applications that focus on one-way information provision and service delivery. This paper distinguishes between e-government and processes of e-democracy, which facilitate active civic engagement through two-way, ongoing dialogue. It draws from participation initiatives undertaken in two case studies. The first highlights efforts to increase youth engagement in the local government area of Milton Keynes in the United Kingdom. The second is Iceland’s constitutional crowdsourcing, an initiative intended to increase civic input into constitutional reform. These examples illustrate that, in order to maintain legitimacy in the networked environment, a change in the culture of governments to facilitate open and responsive e-democracy practices is required. Moreover, when coupled with traditional participation methods, processes of e-democracy enable wide civic involvement and emphasise that e-democracy should not be separated from the everyday operations of government. While online democratic engagement is a slowly evolving process, initial steps are being undertaken by governments that enable e-participation to shape democratic reform.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCeDEM13: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government
    EditorsP Parycek, N Edelmann
    Place of PublicationAustria
    PublisherEdition Donau-Universitat Krems
    Pages31-43
    Number of pages13
    Volume2013
    ISBN (Print)9783902505309
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    EventInternational C onference for E-Democracy and Open Government - Krems, Austria
    Duration: 22 May 201324 May 2013

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational C onference for E-Democracy and Open Government
    CountryAustria
    CityKrems
    Period22/05/1324/05/13

    Fingerprint

    electronic democracy
    myth
    democracy
    reform
    participation
    electronic government
    communication technology
    information technology
    constitutional reform
    Iceland
    legitimacy
    dialogue

    Cite this

    FREEMAN, J., & Quirke, S. (2013). is E-Democracy a Myth? Civic Participation and Democratic Reform. In P. Parycek, & N. Edelmann (Eds.), CeDEM13: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (Vol. 2013, pp. 31-43). Austria: Edition Donau-Universitat Krems.
    FREEMAN, Julie ; Quirke, Sharna. / is E-Democracy a Myth? Civic Participation and Democratic Reform. CeDEM13: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government. editor / P Parycek ; N Edelmann. Vol. 2013 Austria : Edition Donau-Universitat Krems, 2013. pp. 31-43
    @inproceedings{373b459ee7b744428667f593115fa90f,
    title = "is E-Democracy a Myth? Civic Participation and Democratic Reform",
    abstract = "Information and communication technologies (ICTs) offer opportunities for greater civic participation in democratic reform. Government ICT use has, however, predominantly been associated with e-government applications that focus on one-way information provision and service delivery. This paper distinguishes between e-government and processes of e-democracy, which facilitate active civic engagement through two-way, ongoing dialogue. It draws from participation initiatives undertaken in two case studies. The first highlights efforts to increase youth engagement in the local government area of Milton Keynes in the United Kingdom. The second is Iceland’s constitutional crowdsourcing, an initiative intended to increase civic input into constitutional reform. These examples illustrate that, in order to maintain legitimacy in the networked environment, a change in the culture of governments to facilitate open and responsive e-democracy practices is required. Moreover, when coupled with traditional participation methods, processes of e-democracy enable wide civic involvement and emphasise that e-democracy should not be separated from the everyday operations of government. While online democratic engagement is a slowly evolving process, initial steps are being undertaken by governments that enable e-participation to shape democratic reform.",
    keywords = "e-democracy, civic participation, open government",
    author = "Julie FREEMAN and Sharna Quirke",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9783902505309",
    volume = "2013",
    pages = "31--43",
    editor = "P Parycek and N Edelmann",
    booktitle = "CeDEM13: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government",
    publisher = "Edition Donau-Universitat Krems",

    }

    FREEMAN, J & Quirke, S 2013, is E-Democracy a Myth? Civic Participation and Democratic Reform. in P Parycek & N Edelmann (eds), CeDEM13: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government. vol. 2013, Edition Donau-Universitat Krems, Austria, pp. 31-43, International C onference for E-Democracy and Open Government, Krems, Austria, 22/05/13.

    is E-Democracy a Myth? Civic Participation and Democratic Reform. / FREEMAN, Julie; Quirke, Sharna.

    CeDEM13: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government. ed. / P Parycek; N Edelmann. Vol. 2013 Austria : Edition Donau-Universitat Krems, 2013. p. 31-43.

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - is E-Democracy a Myth? Civic Participation and Democratic Reform

    AU - FREEMAN, Julie

    AU - Quirke, Sharna

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Information and communication technologies (ICTs) offer opportunities for greater civic participation in democratic reform. Government ICT use has, however, predominantly been associated with e-government applications that focus on one-way information provision and service delivery. This paper distinguishes between e-government and processes of e-democracy, which facilitate active civic engagement through two-way, ongoing dialogue. It draws from participation initiatives undertaken in two case studies. The first highlights efforts to increase youth engagement in the local government area of Milton Keynes in the United Kingdom. The second is Iceland’s constitutional crowdsourcing, an initiative intended to increase civic input into constitutional reform. These examples illustrate that, in order to maintain legitimacy in the networked environment, a change in the culture of governments to facilitate open and responsive e-democracy practices is required. Moreover, when coupled with traditional participation methods, processes of e-democracy enable wide civic involvement and emphasise that e-democracy should not be separated from the everyday operations of government. While online democratic engagement is a slowly evolving process, initial steps are being undertaken by governments that enable e-participation to shape democratic reform.

    AB - Information and communication technologies (ICTs) offer opportunities for greater civic participation in democratic reform. Government ICT use has, however, predominantly been associated with e-government applications that focus on one-way information provision and service delivery. This paper distinguishes between e-government and processes of e-democracy, which facilitate active civic engagement through two-way, ongoing dialogue. It draws from participation initiatives undertaken in two case studies. The first highlights efforts to increase youth engagement in the local government area of Milton Keynes in the United Kingdom. The second is Iceland’s constitutional crowdsourcing, an initiative intended to increase civic input into constitutional reform. These examples illustrate that, in order to maintain legitimacy in the networked environment, a change in the culture of governments to facilitate open and responsive e-democracy practices is required. Moreover, when coupled with traditional participation methods, processes of e-democracy enable wide civic involvement and emphasise that e-democracy should not be separated from the everyday operations of government. While online democratic engagement is a slowly evolving process, initial steps are being undertaken by governments that enable e-participation to shape democratic reform.

    KW - e-democracy

    KW - civic participation

    KW - open government

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 9783902505309

    VL - 2013

    SP - 31

    EP - 43

    BT - CeDEM13: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government

    A2 - Parycek, P

    A2 - Edelmann, N

    PB - Edition Donau-Universitat Krems

    CY - Austria

    ER -

    FREEMAN J, Quirke S. is E-Democracy a Myth? Civic Participation and Democratic Reform. In Parycek P, Edelmann N, editors, CeDEM13: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government. Vol. 2013. Austria: Edition Donau-Universitat Krems. 2013. p. 31-43