Is ‘Eurorealism’ the new ‘Euroscepticism’? Modern conservatism, the European Conservatives and Reformists and European integration

Benjamin LERUTH

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

Abstract

Introduction For many right-wing conservative political parties across Europe, the European integration project has always been somewhat controversial. In the European Parliament, while the overwhelming majority of parties belonging to the European People’s Party (EPP) tend to be strongly supportive of developments at the EU level, the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group, created in 2009 under the leadership of David Cameron, involved political parties that raise some concerns over some aspects of the European Union (EU). In the existing literature, the ECR group is often considered as a ‘soft Eurosceptic’ (see e.g. Usherwood and Startin 2013; Brack and Startin 2015) or ‘anti-federalist’ (see e.g. Taggart and Szczerbiak 2013). However, the group prefers to be referred to as ‘Eurorealist’, a notion that has been around since the early 2000s but still remains unclear in the literature. This chapter examines the transnational and pan-European ‘Eurorealist’ movement and aims at determining whether Eurorealism can be understood as a synonym of ‘soft Euroscepticism’.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEuroscepticism as a Transnational and Pan-European Phenomenon
Subtitle of host publicationThe Emergence of a New Sphere of Opposition
EditorsJohn FitzGibbon, Benjamin Leruth, Nick Startin
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter4
Pages46-62
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)9781138917651
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Cite this

LERUTH, B. (2017). Is ‘Eurorealism’ the new ‘Euroscepticism’? Modern conservatism, the European Conservatives and Reformists and European integration. In J. FitzGibbon, B. Leruth, & N. Startin (Eds.), Euroscepticism as a Transnational and Pan-European Phenomenon: The Emergence of a New Sphere of Opposition (pp. 46-62). London: Routledge.