Is quick, is good. Or is it? Perils of the 24/7 news cycle

Matthew Ricketson

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    Abstract

    The rise of 24 hour news channels, blogs, wikis, social media and twitter mean that today the news cycle is measured in seconds rather than days or even hours, and that it literally runs 24 hours a day seven days a week. Many benefits flow from this development, especially when compared to the impact of the slow pace of news dissemination in the nineteenth century, but this paper will focus on some of the potential negative consequences, whether they were foreseen or unintended. There is now a superabundance of information, opinion and entertainment available to the public on the broad range of political, economic, social and cultural issues that preoccupy any society. On the face of it, this suggests better informed policy-makers and a more engaged polity, but is this actually happening? To what extent are policy-makers influenced by the speed of the news cycle and the accompanying pressure, whether from journalists or opinion polls? To what extent is citizens’ engagement with issues shaped and in important ways foreshortened by the speed of the news cycle? Is the space for more considered and detailed investigation and analysis of issues being squeezed out by the so-called ‘need for speed’, or is it being submerged amid the sheer volume of material available? These issues will be discussed by examining Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s Labor government from 2007 to his shock resignation in June 2010 and its aftermath.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationRecord of CPRF Communications Policy and Research Forum 2010
    Place of PublicationSydney, Australia
    PublisherNetwork Insight
    Pages157-165
    Number of pages9
    ISBN (Print)9780980434439
    Publication statusPublished - 2010
    EventCommunication Policy and Research Forum 2010 - Sydney, Australia
    Duration: 15 Nov 201016 Nov 2010

    Conference

    ConferenceCommunication Policy and Research Forum 2010
    CountryAustralia
    CitySydney
    Period15/11/1016/11/10

    Fingerprint

    news
    news channel
    resignation
    opinion poll
    twitter
    social media
    weblog
    entertainment
    journalist
    minister
    nineteenth century
    labor
    citizen
    economics

    Cite this

    Ricketson, M. (2010). Is quick, is good. Or is it? Perils of the 24/7 news cycle. In Record of CPRF Communications Policy and Research Forum 2010 (pp. 157-165). Sydney, Australia: Network Insight.
    Ricketson, Matthew. / Is quick, is good. Or is it? Perils of the 24/7 news cycle. Record of CPRF Communications Policy and Research Forum 2010. Sydney, Australia : Network Insight, 2010. pp. 157-165
    @inproceedings{e87488adf6994e2091b18e6f6e95897c,
    title = "Is quick, is good. Or is it? Perils of the 24/7 news cycle",
    abstract = "The rise of 24 hour news channels, blogs, wikis, social media and twitter mean that today the news cycle is measured in seconds rather than days or even hours, and that it literally runs 24 hours a day seven days a week. Many benefits flow from this development, especially when compared to the impact of the slow pace of news dissemination in the nineteenth century, but this paper will focus on some of the potential negative consequences, whether they were foreseen or unintended. There is now a superabundance of information, opinion and entertainment available to the public on the broad range of political, economic, social and cultural issues that preoccupy any society. On the face of it, this suggests better informed policy-makers and a more engaged polity, but is this actually happening? To what extent are policy-makers influenced by the speed of the news cycle and the accompanying pressure, whether from journalists or opinion polls? To what extent is citizens’ engagement with issues shaped and in important ways foreshortened by the speed of the news cycle? Is the space for more considered and detailed investigation and analysis of issues being squeezed out by the so-called ‘need for speed’, or is it being submerged amid the sheer volume of material available? These issues will be discussed by examining Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s Labor government from 2007 to his shock resignation in June 2010 and its aftermath.",
    author = "Matthew Ricketson",
    year = "2010",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9780980434439",
    pages = "157--165",
    booktitle = "Record of CPRF Communications Policy and Research Forum 2010",
    publisher = "Network Insight",

    }

    Ricketson, M 2010, Is quick, is good. Or is it? Perils of the 24/7 news cycle. in Record of CPRF Communications Policy and Research Forum 2010. Network Insight, Sydney, Australia, pp. 157-165, Communication Policy and Research Forum 2010, Sydney, Australia, 15/11/10.

    Is quick, is good. Or is it? Perils of the 24/7 news cycle. / Ricketson, Matthew.

    Record of CPRF Communications Policy and Research Forum 2010. Sydney, Australia : Network Insight, 2010. p. 157-165.

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Is quick, is good. Or is it? Perils of the 24/7 news cycle

    AU - Ricketson, Matthew

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - The rise of 24 hour news channels, blogs, wikis, social media and twitter mean that today the news cycle is measured in seconds rather than days or even hours, and that it literally runs 24 hours a day seven days a week. Many benefits flow from this development, especially when compared to the impact of the slow pace of news dissemination in the nineteenth century, but this paper will focus on some of the potential negative consequences, whether they were foreseen or unintended. There is now a superabundance of information, opinion and entertainment available to the public on the broad range of political, economic, social and cultural issues that preoccupy any society. On the face of it, this suggests better informed policy-makers and a more engaged polity, but is this actually happening? To what extent are policy-makers influenced by the speed of the news cycle and the accompanying pressure, whether from journalists or opinion polls? To what extent is citizens’ engagement with issues shaped and in important ways foreshortened by the speed of the news cycle? Is the space for more considered and detailed investigation and analysis of issues being squeezed out by the so-called ‘need for speed’, or is it being submerged amid the sheer volume of material available? These issues will be discussed by examining Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s Labor government from 2007 to his shock resignation in June 2010 and its aftermath.

    AB - The rise of 24 hour news channels, blogs, wikis, social media and twitter mean that today the news cycle is measured in seconds rather than days or even hours, and that it literally runs 24 hours a day seven days a week. Many benefits flow from this development, especially when compared to the impact of the slow pace of news dissemination in the nineteenth century, but this paper will focus on some of the potential negative consequences, whether they were foreseen or unintended. There is now a superabundance of information, opinion and entertainment available to the public on the broad range of political, economic, social and cultural issues that preoccupy any society. On the face of it, this suggests better informed policy-makers and a more engaged polity, but is this actually happening? To what extent are policy-makers influenced by the speed of the news cycle and the accompanying pressure, whether from journalists or opinion polls? To what extent is citizens’ engagement with issues shaped and in important ways foreshortened by the speed of the news cycle? Is the space for more considered and detailed investigation and analysis of issues being squeezed out by the so-called ‘need for speed’, or is it being submerged amid the sheer volume of material available? These issues will be discussed by examining Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s Labor government from 2007 to his shock resignation in June 2010 and its aftermath.

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 9780980434439

    SP - 157

    EP - 165

    BT - Record of CPRF Communications Policy and Research Forum 2010

    PB - Network Insight

    CY - Sydney, Australia

    ER -

    Ricketson M. Is quick, is good. Or is it? Perils of the 24/7 news cycle. In Record of CPRF Communications Policy and Research Forum 2010. Sydney, Australia: Network Insight. 2010. p. 157-165