Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions?

Jian D. L. Yen, Jim THOMSON, Ralph MAC NALLY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Community ecologists have attempted to explain species abundance distribution (SAD) shape for more than 80 years, but usually without relating SAD shape explicitly to ecological variables. We explored whether the scale (total assemblage abundance) and shape (assemblage evenness) of avifaunal SADs were related to ecological covariates. We used data on avifaunas, in-site habitat structure and landscape context that were assembled from previous studies; this amounted to 197 transects distributed across 16,000 km2 of the box-ironbark forests of southeastern Australia. We used Bayesian conditional autoregressive models to link SAD scale and shape to these ecological covariates. Variation in SAD scale was relatable to some ecological covariates, especially to landscape vegetation cover and to tree height. We could not find any relationships between SAD shape and ecological covariates. SAD shape, the core component in SAD theory, may hold little information about how assemblages are governed ecologically and may result from statistical processes, which, if general, would indicate that SAD shape is not useful for distinguishing among theories of assemblage structure.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-525
Number of pages9
JournalOecologia
Volume171
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

biogeography
distribution
ecologists
habitat structure
vegetation cover
transect
habitats

Cite this

Yen, Jian D. L. ; THOMSON, Jim ; MAC NALLY, Ralph. / Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions?. In: Oecologia. 2013 ; Vol. 171. pp. 517-525.
@article{be19dc8fbee14bc39f5ea6146be3aabc,
title = "Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions?",
abstract = "Community ecologists have attempted to explain species abundance distribution (SAD) shape for more than 80 years, but usually without relating SAD shape explicitly to ecological variables. We explored whether the scale (total assemblage abundance) and shape (assemblage evenness) of avifaunal SADs were related to ecological covariates. We used data on avifaunas, in-site habitat structure and landscape context that were assembled from previous studies; this amounted to 197 transects distributed across 16,000 km2 of the box-ironbark forests of southeastern Australia. We used Bayesian conditional autoregressive models to link SAD scale and shape to these ecological covariates. Variation in SAD scale was relatable to some ecological covariates, especially to landscape vegetation cover and to tree height. We could not find any relationships between SAD shape and ecological covariates. SAD shape, the core component in SAD theory, may hold little information about how assemblages are governed ecologically and may result from statistical processes, which, if general, would indicate that SAD shape is not useful for distinguishing among theories of assemblage structure.",
keywords = "Assemblage structure, Autoregressive spatial models, Bayesian models, Habitat structure, Avifauna.",
author = "Yen, {Jian D. L.} and Jim THOMSON and {MAC NALLY}, Ralph",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s00442-012-2438-1",
language = "English",
volume = "171",
pages = "517--525",
journal = "Oecologia",
issn = "0029-8549",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions? / Yen, Jian D. L.; THOMSON, Jim; MAC NALLY, Ralph.

In: Oecologia, Vol. 171, 2013, p. 517-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions?

AU - Yen, Jian D. L.

AU - THOMSON, Jim

AU - MAC NALLY, Ralph

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Community ecologists have attempted to explain species abundance distribution (SAD) shape for more than 80 years, but usually without relating SAD shape explicitly to ecological variables. We explored whether the scale (total assemblage abundance) and shape (assemblage evenness) of avifaunal SADs were related to ecological covariates. We used data on avifaunas, in-site habitat structure and landscape context that were assembled from previous studies; this amounted to 197 transects distributed across 16,000 km2 of the box-ironbark forests of southeastern Australia. We used Bayesian conditional autoregressive models to link SAD scale and shape to these ecological covariates. Variation in SAD scale was relatable to some ecological covariates, especially to landscape vegetation cover and to tree height. We could not find any relationships between SAD shape and ecological covariates. SAD shape, the core component in SAD theory, may hold little information about how assemblages are governed ecologically and may result from statistical processes, which, if general, would indicate that SAD shape is not useful for distinguishing among theories of assemblage structure.

AB - Community ecologists have attempted to explain species abundance distribution (SAD) shape for more than 80 years, but usually without relating SAD shape explicitly to ecological variables. We explored whether the scale (total assemblage abundance) and shape (assemblage evenness) of avifaunal SADs were related to ecological covariates. We used data on avifaunas, in-site habitat structure and landscape context that were assembled from previous studies; this amounted to 197 transects distributed across 16,000 km2 of the box-ironbark forests of southeastern Australia. We used Bayesian conditional autoregressive models to link SAD scale and shape to these ecological covariates. Variation in SAD scale was relatable to some ecological covariates, especially to landscape vegetation cover and to tree height. We could not find any relationships between SAD shape and ecological covariates. SAD shape, the core component in SAD theory, may hold little information about how assemblages are governed ecologically and may result from statistical processes, which, if general, would indicate that SAD shape is not useful for distinguishing among theories of assemblage structure.

KW - Assemblage structure

KW - Autoregressive spatial models

KW - Bayesian models

KW - Habitat structure

KW - Avifauna.

U2 - 10.1007/s00442-012-2438-1

DO - 10.1007/s00442-012-2438-1

M3 - Article

VL - 171

SP - 517

EP - 525

JO - Oecologia

JF - Oecologia

SN - 0029-8549

ER -