'It's like having a physician in your pocket!' A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps

Deborah Lupton, Annemarie Jutel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

More than 100,000 mobile phone software applications ('apps') have been designed for the dissemination of health and medical information and healthcare and public health initiatives. This article presents a critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps directed at lay people that were available on the Apple App Store and Google Play in mid-April 2014. The objective of the analysis is to contribute to the sociology of diagnosis and to critical digital health studies by investigating the phenomenon of digitised diagnosis via apps. We adopted a perspective that views apps as sociocultural artefacts. Our analysis of self-diagnosis apps suggests that they inhabit a contested and ambiguous site of meaning and practice. We found that app developers combined claims to medical expertise in conjunction with appeals to algorithmic authority to promote their apps to potential users. While the developers also used appeals to patient engagement as part of their promotional efforts, these were undermined by routine disclaimers that users should seek medical advice to effect a diagnosis. More research is required to investigate how lay people are negotiating the use of these apps, the implications for privacy of their personal data and the possible effects on the doctor-patient relationship and medical authority in relation to diagnosis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-135
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume133
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Fingerprint

physician
Physicians
appeal
Patient Participation
personal data
Cell Phones
Sociology
Privacy
Negotiating
Health
Malus
health
Artifacts
search engine
privacy
Smartphone
Critical Analysis
artifact
sociology
expertise

Cite this

@article{4da90238371445a9933e55094ad9972c,
title = "'It's like having a physician in your pocket!' A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps",
abstract = "More than 100,000 mobile phone software applications ('apps') have been designed for the dissemination of health and medical information and healthcare and public health initiatives. This article presents a critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps directed at lay people that were available on the Apple App Store and Google Play in mid-April 2014. The objective of the analysis is to contribute to the sociology of diagnosis and to critical digital health studies by investigating the phenomenon of digitised diagnosis via apps. We adopted a perspective that views apps as sociocultural artefacts. Our analysis of self-diagnosis apps suggests that they inhabit a contested and ambiguous site of meaning and practice. We found that app developers combined claims to medical expertise in conjunction with appeals to algorithmic authority to promote their apps to potential users. While the developers also used appeals to patient engagement as part of their promotional efforts, these were undermined by routine disclaimers that users should seek medical advice to effect a diagnosis. More research is required to investigate how lay people are negotiating the use of these apps, the implications for privacy of their personal data and the possible effects on the doctor-patient relationship and medical authority in relation to diagnosis.",
keywords = "Critical digital health studies, Mobile apps, Self-diagnosis, Smartphones, Sociology of diagnosis",
author = "Deborah Lupton and Annemarie Jutel",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.004",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "128--135",
journal = "Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

'It's like having a physician in your pocket!' A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. / Lupton, Deborah; Jutel, Annemarie.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 133, 05.2015, p. 128-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'It's like having a physician in your pocket!' A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps

AU - Lupton, Deborah

AU - Jutel, Annemarie

PY - 2015/5

Y1 - 2015/5

N2 - More than 100,000 mobile phone software applications ('apps') have been designed for the dissemination of health and medical information and healthcare and public health initiatives. This article presents a critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps directed at lay people that were available on the Apple App Store and Google Play in mid-April 2014. The objective of the analysis is to contribute to the sociology of diagnosis and to critical digital health studies by investigating the phenomenon of digitised diagnosis via apps. We adopted a perspective that views apps as sociocultural artefacts. Our analysis of self-diagnosis apps suggests that they inhabit a contested and ambiguous site of meaning and practice. We found that app developers combined claims to medical expertise in conjunction with appeals to algorithmic authority to promote their apps to potential users. While the developers also used appeals to patient engagement as part of their promotional efforts, these were undermined by routine disclaimers that users should seek medical advice to effect a diagnosis. More research is required to investigate how lay people are negotiating the use of these apps, the implications for privacy of their personal data and the possible effects on the doctor-patient relationship and medical authority in relation to diagnosis.

AB - More than 100,000 mobile phone software applications ('apps') have been designed for the dissemination of health and medical information and healthcare and public health initiatives. This article presents a critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps directed at lay people that were available on the Apple App Store and Google Play in mid-April 2014. The objective of the analysis is to contribute to the sociology of diagnosis and to critical digital health studies by investigating the phenomenon of digitised diagnosis via apps. We adopted a perspective that views apps as sociocultural artefacts. Our analysis of self-diagnosis apps suggests that they inhabit a contested and ambiguous site of meaning and practice. We found that app developers combined claims to medical expertise in conjunction with appeals to algorithmic authority to promote their apps to potential users. While the developers also used appeals to patient engagement as part of their promotional efforts, these were undermined by routine disclaimers that users should seek medical advice to effect a diagnosis. More research is required to investigate how lay people are negotiating the use of these apps, the implications for privacy of their personal data and the possible effects on the doctor-patient relationship and medical authority in relation to diagnosis.

KW - Critical digital health studies

KW - Mobile apps

KW - Self-diagnosis

KW - Smartphones

KW - Sociology of diagnosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926432398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/like-having-physician-pocket-critical-analysis-selfdiagnosis-smartphone-apps-1

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.004

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 128

EP - 135

JO - Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine

JF - Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -