TY - JOUR
T1 - “It’s the Seeing and Feeling”
T2 - How Embodied and Conceptual Knowledges Relate in Pipeline Engineering Work
AU - Maslen, Sarah
AU - Hayes, Jan
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the participants in our study for generously giving their time and for sharing their experiences and skills. The cash and in-kind support from the Australian Pipelines and Gas Association (APGA) Research and Standards Committee (RSC) as part of the Future Fuels Cooperative Research Centre is gratefully acknowledged.
Funding Information:
This work was funded by the Future Fuels Cooperative Research Centre (FFCRC), supported through the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program. Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - This paper examines the relationship between conceptual and embodied reasoning in engineering work. In the last decade across multiple research projects on pipeline engineering, we have observed only a few times when engineers have expressed embodied or sensory aspects of their practice, as if the activity itself is disembodied. Yet, they also often speak about the importance of field experience. In this paper, we look at engineers’ accounts of the value of field experience showing how it works on their sense of what the technology that they are designing looks, feels, and sounds like in practice, and so what this means for construction and operation, and the management of risk. We show how office-based pipeline engineering work is an exercise in embodied imagination that humanizes the socio-technical system as it manifests in the technical artifacts that they work with. Engineers take the role of the other to reason through the practicability of their designs and risk acceptability.
AB - This paper examines the relationship between conceptual and embodied reasoning in engineering work. In the last decade across multiple research projects on pipeline engineering, we have observed only a few times when engineers have expressed embodied or sensory aspects of their practice, as if the activity itself is disembodied. Yet, they also often speak about the importance of field experience. In this paper, we look at engineers’ accounts of the value of field experience showing how it works on their sense of what the technology that they are designing looks, feels, and sounds like in practice, and so what this means for construction and operation, and the management of risk. We show how office-based pipeline engineering work is an exercise in embodied imagination that humanizes the socio-technical system as it manifests in the technical artifacts that they work with. Engineers take the role of the other to reason through the practicability of their designs and risk acceptability.
KW - Embodiment
KW - Engineering practice
KW - Fieldwork
KW - Reasoning
KW - Risk
KW - Senses
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140133451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11133-022-09520-8
DO - 10.1007/s11133-022-09520-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140133451
SN - 0162-0436
VL - 45
SP - 593
EP - 616
JO - Qualitative Sociology
JF - Qualitative Sociology
IS - 4
ER -