Journalistic challenges of the public and private

Exploring professional and ethical norms

Jeremy Stevens, Glen FULLER

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Journalism has recently been described as a “profession in a permanent process of becoming” (Deuze & Witschge, 2017, p. 13). This paper investigates a decade of commentary (2006-2015) from media industry ‘grey literature’ that engages with the resultant on-going rearticulation of professional norms. We focus on the ethical challenges that develop as a result of changes in part wrought by social media-based communications technologies. Our ‘grey literature’ archive consists of 1156 articles published through US-based Poynter Institute, Nieman Lab, and Nieman Reports. Using a ‘hybrid methodology’ (Lewis, Zamith, & Hermida, 2013), we carry out a close reading discourse analysis of the commentary. Our initial goal was to understand the shift in the character of discourse from one organised around a single set of changes (“the digital”, “the internet”, etc.) to a more multi-dimensional appreciation of such changes. The character of critical commentary itself changes at various points in the archive to engage with problems that are now familiar; these include commentary about the verification of information and the ‘truth’; sourcing techniques; and the blurring of public and private spheres, and changing behaviours of publicity. Indeed, these ethical and professional challenges for journalists are not new for the most part. Our key finding is that there is a struggle to critically and reflexively rearticulate ‘traditional’ norms to adapt to the shifting dynamics of online networked media and their ethical and professional implications. In an era of ongoing change, this normative reflex therefore demands further attention.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)113-125
    Number of pages13
    JournalAustralian Journalism Review
    Volume39
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

    Fingerprint

    gray literature
    online media
    media industry
    publicity
    social media
    journalism
    discourse analysis
    journalist
    communication technology
    profession
    Internet
    discourse
    methodology

    Cite this

    @article{cbfa6800a8414017885d46ffaacb1c66,
    title = "Journalistic challenges of the public and private: Exploring professional and ethical norms",
    abstract = "Journalism has recently been described as a “profession in a permanent process of becoming” (Deuze & Witschge, 2017, p. 13). This paper investigates a decade of commentary (2006-2015) from media industry ‘grey literature’ that engages with the resultant on-going rearticulation of professional norms. We focus on the ethical challenges that develop as a result of changes in part wrought by social media-based communications technologies. Our ‘grey literature’ archive consists of 1156 articles published through US-based Poynter Institute, Nieman Lab, and Nieman Reports. Using a ‘hybrid methodology’ (Lewis, Zamith, & Hermida, 2013), we carry out a close reading discourse analysis of the commentary. Our initial goal was to understand the shift in the character of discourse from one organised around a single set of changes (“the digital”, “the internet”, etc.) to a more multi-dimensional appreciation of such changes. The character of critical commentary itself changes at various points in the archive to engage with problems that are now familiar; these include commentary about the verification of information and the ‘truth’; sourcing techniques; and the blurring of public and private spheres, and changing behaviours of publicity. Indeed, these ethical and professional challenges for journalists are not new for the most part. Our key finding is that there is a struggle to critically and reflexively rearticulate ‘traditional’ norms to adapt to the shifting dynamics of online networked media and their ethical and professional implications. In an era of ongoing change, this normative reflex therefore demands further attention.",
    keywords = "grey literature, journalism, Ethics, Media Culture, Media Technology",
    author = "Jeremy Stevens and Glen FULLER",
    year = "2017",
    month = "7",
    language = "English",
    volume = "39",
    pages = "113--125",
    journal = "Australian Journalism Review",
    issn = "0810-2686",
    number = "1",

    }

    Journalistic challenges of the public and private : Exploring professional and ethical norms. / Stevens, Jeremy; FULLER, Glen.

    In: Australian Journalism Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, 07.2017, p. 113-125.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Journalistic challenges of the public and private

    T2 - Exploring professional and ethical norms

    AU - Stevens, Jeremy

    AU - FULLER, Glen

    PY - 2017/7

    Y1 - 2017/7

    N2 - Journalism has recently been described as a “profession in a permanent process of becoming” (Deuze & Witschge, 2017, p. 13). This paper investigates a decade of commentary (2006-2015) from media industry ‘grey literature’ that engages with the resultant on-going rearticulation of professional norms. We focus on the ethical challenges that develop as a result of changes in part wrought by social media-based communications technologies. Our ‘grey literature’ archive consists of 1156 articles published through US-based Poynter Institute, Nieman Lab, and Nieman Reports. Using a ‘hybrid methodology’ (Lewis, Zamith, & Hermida, 2013), we carry out a close reading discourse analysis of the commentary. Our initial goal was to understand the shift in the character of discourse from one organised around a single set of changes (“the digital”, “the internet”, etc.) to a more multi-dimensional appreciation of such changes. The character of critical commentary itself changes at various points in the archive to engage with problems that are now familiar; these include commentary about the verification of information and the ‘truth’; sourcing techniques; and the blurring of public and private spheres, and changing behaviours of publicity. Indeed, these ethical and professional challenges for journalists are not new for the most part. Our key finding is that there is a struggle to critically and reflexively rearticulate ‘traditional’ norms to adapt to the shifting dynamics of online networked media and their ethical and professional implications. In an era of ongoing change, this normative reflex therefore demands further attention.

    AB - Journalism has recently been described as a “profession in a permanent process of becoming” (Deuze & Witschge, 2017, p. 13). This paper investigates a decade of commentary (2006-2015) from media industry ‘grey literature’ that engages with the resultant on-going rearticulation of professional norms. We focus on the ethical challenges that develop as a result of changes in part wrought by social media-based communications technologies. Our ‘grey literature’ archive consists of 1156 articles published through US-based Poynter Institute, Nieman Lab, and Nieman Reports. Using a ‘hybrid methodology’ (Lewis, Zamith, & Hermida, 2013), we carry out a close reading discourse analysis of the commentary. Our initial goal was to understand the shift in the character of discourse from one organised around a single set of changes (“the digital”, “the internet”, etc.) to a more multi-dimensional appreciation of such changes. The character of critical commentary itself changes at various points in the archive to engage with problems that are now familiar; these include commentary about the verification of information and the ‘truth’; sourcing techniques; and the blurring of public and private spheres, and changing behaviours of publicity. Indeed, these ethical and professional challenges for journalists are not new for the most part. Our key finding is that there is a struggle to critically and reflexively rearticulate ‘traditional’ norms to adapt to the shifting dynamics of online networked media and their ethical and professional implications. In an era of ongoing change, this normative reflex therefore demands further attention.

    KW - grey literature

    KW - journalism

    KW - Ethics

    KW - Media Culture

    KW - Media Technology

    M3 - Article

    VL - 39

    SP - 113

    EP - 125

    JO - Australian Journalism Review

    JF - Australian Journalism Review

    SN - 0810-2686

    IS - 1

    ER -