Julia Gillard's Citizens' Assembly Proposal for Australia: A Deliberative Democratic Analysis

John Boswell, Simon Niemeyer, Carolyn Hendriks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many governments have embraced the rhetoric of inclusive citizen engagement. Greater public involvement promises to strengthen democratic institutions and improve the quality of policy decisions and services. How do these aspirations sit alongside the reality of Australian federal politics? This article investigates the responses of elite policy actors to the Gillard government's proposal to conduct a citizens’ assembly on climate change in 2010. Drawing on over 200 media articles, the authors identify a series of procedural, institutional and political objections raised by elite commentators against the citizens’ assembly proposal. Many of these objections have little basis in the experience of deliberative designs in practice. Some, however, reflect the challenge of realising inclusive, deliberative governance in highly politicised contexts
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-178
Number of pages15
JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

citizen
elite
rhetoric
climate change
governance
politics
experience

Cite this

@article{fe0ac07c26284d529a52a3d3c043119f,
title = "Julia Gillard's Citizens' Assembly Proposal for Australia: A Deliberative Democratic Analysis",
abstract = "Many governments have embraced the rhetoric of inclusive citizen engagement. Greater public involvement promises to strengthen democratic institutions and improve the quality of policy decisions and services. How do these aspirations sit alongside the reality of Australian federal politics? This article investigates the responses of elite policy actors to the Gillard government's proposal to conduct a citizens’ assembly on climate change in 2010. Drawing on over 200 media articles, the authors identify a series of procedural, institutional and political objections raised by elite commentators against the citizens’ assembly proposal. Many of these objections have little basis in the experience of deliberative designs in practice. Some, however, reflect the challenge of realising inclusive, deliberative governance in highly politicised contexts",
author = "John Boswell and Simon Niemeyer and Carolyn Hendriks",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/10361146.2013.786675",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "164--178",
journal = "Australian Journal of Political Science",
issn = "1036-1146",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Julia Gillard's Citizens' Assembly Proposal for Australia: A Deliberative Democratic Analysis. / Boswell, John; Niemeyer, Simon; Hendriks, Carolyn.

In: Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2013, p. 164-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Julia Gillard's Citizens' Assembly Proposal for Australia: A Deliberative Democratic Analysis

AU - Boswell, John

AU - Niemeyer, Simon

AU - Hendriks, Carolyn

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Many governments have embraced the rhetoric of inclusive citizen engagement. Greater public involvement promises to strengthen democratic institutions and improve the quality of policy decisions and services. How do these aspirations sit alongside the reality of Australian federal politics? This article investigates the responses of elite policy actors to the Gillard government's proposal to conduct a citizens’ assembly on climate change in 2010. Drawing on over 200 media articles, the authors identify a series of procedural, institutional and political objections raised by elite commentators against the citizens’ assembly proposal. Many of these objections have little basis in the experience of deliberative designs in practice. Some, however, reflect the challenge of realising inclusive, deliberative governance in highly politicised contexts

AB - Many governments have embraced the rhetoric of inclusive citizen engagement. Greater public involvement promises to strengthen democratic institutions and improve the quality of policy decisions and services. How do these aspirations sit alongside the reality of Australian federal politics? This article investigates the responses of elite policy actors to the Gillard government's proposal to conduct a citizens’ assembly on climate change in 2010. Drawing on over 200 media articles, the authors identify a series of procedural, institutional and political objections raised by elite commentators against the citizens’ assembly proposal. Many of these objections have little basis in the experience of deliberative designs in practice. Some, however, reflect the challenge of realising inclusive, deliberative governance in highly politicised contexts

U2 - 10.1080/10361146.2013.786675

DO - 10.1080/10361146.2013.786675

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 164

EP - 178

JO - Australian Journal of Political Science

JF - Australian Journal of Political Science

SN - 1036-1146

IS - 2

ER -