Jurors using social media in our courts: challenges and responses

Lorana BARTELS, J Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article considers the use of social media by jurors during the trial and deliberation processes. The article presents examples of such conduct from Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom. The article considers research on why jurors use social media, and discusses the likely prevalence of the issue. The article then discusses the risks this conduct presents to the defendant’s right to a fair trial and the administration of justice generally. Possible solutions are examined, including banning telecommunication devices, requiring jurors to take an oath and developing specific jury instructions. Research on the effectiveness of jury instructions is reviewed, and future directions for research, policy and practice noted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-57
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Judicial Administration
Volume23
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

social media
instruction
administration of justice
oath
research policy
research practice
deliberation
telecommunication

Cite this

@article{ab3688ab8f9e4780853c3387f4afa6ec,
title = "Jurors using social media in our courts: challenges and responses",
abstract = "This article considers the use of social media by jurors during the trial and deliberation processes. The article presents examples of such conduct from Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom. The article considers research on why jurors use social media, and discusses the likely prevalence of the issue. The article then discusses the risks this conduct presents to the defendant’s right to a fair trial and the administration of justice generally. Possible solutions are examined, including banning telecommunication devices, requiring jurors to take an oath and developing specific jury instructions. Research on the effectiveness of jury instructions is reviewed, and future directions for research, policy and practice noted.",
keywords = "courts, jurors, social media",
author = "Lorana BARTELS and J Lee",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "35--57",
journal = "Journal of Judicial Administration",
issn = "1036-7918",

}

Jurors using social media in our courts: challenges and responses. / BARTELS, Lorana; Lee, J.

In: Journal of Judicial Administration, Vol. 23, 2013, p. 35-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jurors using social media in our courts: challenges and responses

AU - BARTELS, Lorana

AU - Lee, J

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article considers the use of social media by jurors during the trial and deliberation processes. The article presents examples of such conduct from Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom. The article considers research on why jurors use social media, and discusses the likely prevalence of the issue. The article then discusses the risks this conduct presents to the defendant’s right to a fair trial and the administration of justice generally. Possible solutions are examined, including banning telecommunication devices, requiring jurors to take an oath and developing specific jury instructions. Research on the effectiveness of jury instructions is reviewed, and future directions for research, policy and practice noted.

AB - This article considers the use of social media by jurors during the trial and deliberation processes. The article presents examples of such conduct from Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom. The article considers research on why jurors use social media, and discusses the likely prevalence of the issue. The article then discusses the risks this conduct presents to the defendant’s right to a fair trial and the administration of justice generally. Possible solutions are examined, including banning telecommunication devices, requiring jurors to take an oath and developing specific jury instructions. Research on the effectiveness of jury instructions is reviewed, and future directions for research, policy and practice noted.

KW - courts

KW - jurors

KW - social media

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 35

EP - 57

JO - Journal of Judicial Administration

JF - Journal of Judicial Administration

SN - 1036-7918

ER -