Just War and Military Morale

A Brief Reflection on the Correlation Between the Legality of War and the Moral Repercussions for Members of US and UK Forces Arising from the Questionable Legality of the Campaign Iraqi Freedom of March 2003

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Does it matter to a member of the military whether the military campaign in which he is taking part is lawful or not? Despite the observation that the crime of aggression (post Kampala 2010) constitutes a 'leadership crime par excellence,' which limits any (future) criminal responsibility accordingly, the legality or illegality of any military action under international law can create moral implications for the common foot soldier and mid-level officer and also have a tangible impact on the national legal frameworks under which these forces operate. This short article uses the example of Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) to discuss the repercussions of a-most likely-illegal military campaign for individual members of democratic armed forces before the background of the present discussion of NATO led action in Libya.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-208
Number of pages12
JournalLiverpool Law Review
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

legality
campaign
Military
offense
illegality
Libya
NATO
soldier
international law
aggression
military
leadership
responsibility

Cite this

@article{a5ea04eaae054bb6ba5cf3fb34ecd456,
title = "Just War and Military Morale: A Brief Reflection on the Correlation Between the Legality of War and the Moral Repercussions for Members of US and UK Forces Arising from the Questionable Legality of the Campaign Iraqi Freedom of March 2003",
abstract = "Does it matter to a member of the military whether the military campaign in which he is taking part is lawful or not? Despite the observation that the crime of aggression (post Kampala 2010) constitutes a 'leadership crime par excellence,' which limits any (future) criminal responsibility accordingly, the legality or illegality of any military action under international law can create moral implications for the common foot soldier and mid-level officer and also have a tangible impact on the national legal frameworks under which these forces operate. This short article uses the example of Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) to discuss the repercussions of a-most likely-illegal military campaign for individual members of democratic armed forces before the background of the present discussion of NATO led action in Libya.",
keywords = "Armed conflict, Court martials, Crime of aggression, Legality of the use of force, Military morale, Operation Iraqi freedom",
author = "Bachmann, {Sascha Dominik}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s10991-011-9105-1",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "197--208",
journal = "Liverpool Law Review",
issn = "0144-932X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just War and Military Morale

T2 - A Brief Reflection on the Correlation Between the Legality of War and the Moral Repercussions for Members of US and UK Forces Arising from the Questionable Legality of the Campaign Iraqi Freedom of March 2003

AU - Bachmann, Sascha Dominik

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Does it matter to a member of the military whether the military campaign in which he is taking part is lawful or not? Despite the observation that the crime of aggression (post Kampala 2010) constitutes a 'leadership crime par excellence,' which limits any (future) criminal responsibility accordingly, the legality or illegality of any military action under international law can create moral implications for the common foot soldier and mid-level officer and also have a tangible impact on the national legal frameworks under which these forces operate. This short article uses the example of Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) to discuss the repercussions of a-most likely-illegal military campaign for individual members of democratic armed forces before the background of the present discussion of NATO led action in Libya.

AB - Does it matter to a member of the military whether the military campaign in which he is taking part is lawful or not? Despite the observation that the crime of aggression (post Kampala 2010) constitutes a 'leadership crime par excellence,' which limits any (future) criminal responsibility accordingly, the legality or illegality of any military action under international law can create moral implications for the common foot soldier and mid-level officer and also have a tangible impact on the national legal frameworks under which these forces operate. This short article uses the example of Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) to discuss the repercussions of a-most likely-illegal military campaign for individual members of democratic armed forces before the background of the present discussion of NATO led action in Libya.

KW - Armed conflict

KW - Court martials

KW - Crime of aggression

KW - Legality of the use of force

KW - Military morale

KW - Operation Iraqi freedom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84155180686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10991-011-9105-1

DO - 10.1007/s10991-011-9105-1

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 197

EP - 208

JO - Liverpool Law Review

JF - Liverpool Law Review

SN - 0144-932X

IS - 3

ER -