Karzai's curse - legitimacy as stability in Afghanistan and other post-conflict environments

Sultan Barakat, Mark Evans, Steven Zyck

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper examines the theory behind and some examples of the relationships between gender, language, cognition and perception in the context of the criminal justice system. In particular, we consider the language of domestic violence and sexual assault and how words and communication styles can affect and are affected by what we think and believe to be ‘reality’. The paper illustrates how the language used to describe violence against women may operate to minimise these acts, and the dominant conversational style and female violence victims' genderlect may collide to produce evidentiary issues and a credibility gap. We argue that there is an inherent dilemma in engaging with legal constructs which continue to negate women's understandings of reality, and that the voices of female rape and domestic violence victims remain muted by the baritone ‘voice’ of the legal system
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)439-454
    Number of pages16
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume33
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Afghanistan
    legitimacy
    domestic violence
    language
    violence
    assault
    rape
    legal system
    credibility
    cognition
    justice
    communication
    gender

    Cite this

    @article{c7a41cb2a56e4809bccc3b6731b8f142,
    title = "Karzai's curse - legitimacy as stability in Afghanistan and other post-conflict environments",
    abstract = "This paper examines the theory behind and some examples of the relationships between gender, language, cognition and perception in the context of the criminal justice system. In particular, we consider the language of domestic violence and sexual assault and how words and communication styles can affect and are affected by what we think and believe to be ‘reality’. The paper illustrates how the language used to describe violence against women may operate to minimise these acts, and the dominant conversational style and female violence victims' genderlect may collide to produce evidentiary issues and a credibility gap. We argue that there is an inherent dilemma in engaging with legal constructs which continue to negate women's understandings of reality, and that the voices of female rape and domestic violence victims remain muted by the baritone ‘voice’ of the legal system",
    author = "Sultan Barakat and Mark Evans and Steven Zyck",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2012.705644",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "439--454",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "5",

    }

    Karzai's curse - legitimacy as stability in Afghanistan and other post-conflict environments. / Barakat, Sultan; Evans, Mark; Zyck, Steven.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2012, p. 439-454.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Karzai's curse - legitimacy as stability in Afghanistan and other post-conflict environments

    AU - Barakat, Sultan

    AU - Evans, Mark

    AU - Zyck, Steven

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - This paper examines the theory behind and some examples of the relationships between gender, language, cognition and perception in the context of the criminal justice system. In particular, we consider the language of domestic violence and sexual assault and how words and communication styles can affect and are affected by what we think and believe to be ‘reality’. The paper illustrates how the language used to describe violence against women may operate to minimise these acts, and the dominant conversational style and female violence victims' genderlect may collide to produce evidentiary issues and a credibility gap. We argue that there is an inherent dilemma in engaging with legal constructs which continue to negate women's understandings of reality, and that the voices of female rape and domestic violence victims remain muted by the baritone ‘voice’ of the legal system

    AB - This paper examines the theory behind and some examples of the relationships between gender, language, cognition and perception in the context of the criminal justice system. In particular, we consider the language of domestic violence and sexual assault and how words and communication styles can affect and are affected by what we think and believe to be ‘reality’. The paper illustrates how the language used to describe violence against women may operate to minimise these acts, and the dominant conversational style and female violence victims' genderlect may collide to produce evidentiary issues and a credibility gap. We argue that there is an inherent dilemma in engaging with legal constructs which continue to negate women's understandings of reality, and that the voices of female rape and domestic violence victims remain muted by the baritone ‘voice’ of the legal system

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2012.705644

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2012.705644

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 439

    EP - 454

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 5

    ER -