Knowledge and use of evidence-based practice by allied health and health science professionals in the United Kingdom

Dominic Upton, Penney Upton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical effectiveness (CE) and evidence-based practice (EBP) are the cornerstone of modern-day health care. Although many studies have explored attitudes and perceived knowledge of individual professions, few have compared these factors between professional groups, especially in the allied health professions (AHP) and health science services (HSS). We report a study comparing the knowledge and practice of 14 different professional groups from the AHP and HSS in terms of EBP and CE. The aim was to highlight any differences between the 14 professional groups along with the needs of the groups. A postal questionnaire survey was completed by a random sample of 1,000 members of AHP and HSS across the United Kingdom. There were significant differences between professional groups with, in general, professionals from the HSS groups rating their knowledge and application of CE and EBP as lower than members of the AHP. Differences were also noted between individual professional groups. For example, podiatrists, radiographers, and orthoptists reported having less knowledge of CE and EBP than physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dietitians, speech and language therapists, and psychologists. Barriers to implementing EBP were similar for all groups, with lack of both time and money cited as the main issues. A number of differences between professions were recorded that highlight the difference in educational and policy approach required for greater uptake of EBP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-133
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Allied Health
Volume35
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Health Occupations
Health Services
Health
Nutritionists
Physical Therapists
United Kingdom
Language
Psychology
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

@article{398d30f114184a8a96484e934112fe9b,
title = "Knowledge and use of evidence-based practice by allied health and health science professionals in the United Kingdom",
abstract = "Clinical effectiveness (CE) and evidence-based practice (EBP) are the cornerstone of modern-day health care. Although many studies have explored attitudes and perceived knowledge of individual professions, few have compared these factors between professional groups, especially in the allied health professions (AHP) and health science services (HSS). We report a study comparing the knowledge and practice of 14 different professional groups from the AHP and HSS in terms of EBP and CE. The aim was to highlight any differences between the 14 professional groups along with the needs of the groups. A postal questionnaire survey was completed by a random sample of 1,000 members of AHP and HSS across the United Kingdom. There were significant differences between professional groups with, in general, professionals from the HSS groups rating their knowledge and application of CE and EBP as lower than members of the AHP. Differences were also noted between individual professional groups. For example, podiatrists, radiographers, and orthoptists reported having less knowledge of CE and EBP than physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dietitians, speech and language therapists, and psychologists. Barriers to implementing EBP were similar for all groups, with lack of both time and money cited as the main issues. A number of differences between professions were recorded that highlight the difference in educational and policy approach required for greater uptake of EBP.",
keywords = "Allied Health Personnel Education, Allied Health Personnel United Kingdom, Clinical Competence, Confidence Intervals, Descriptive Statistics, Female, Health Knowledge, Health Occupations, Health Personnel Education, Human, Male, Medical Practice, Evidence-Based, One-Way Analysis of Variance, Post Hoc Analysis, Questionnaires, Summated Rating Scaling, Surveys, Test-Retest Reliability, United Kingdom",
author = "Dominic Upton and Penney Upton",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "127--133",
journal = "Journal of Allied Health",
issn = "0090-7421",
publisher = "Science and Medicine Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Knowledge and use of evidence-based practice by allied health and health science professionals in the United Kingdom. / Upton, Dominic; Upton, Penney.

In: Journal of Allied Health, Vol. 35, No. 3, 09.2006, p. 127-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge and use of evidence-based practice by allied health and health science professionals in the United Kingdom

AU - Upton, Dominic

AU - Upton, Penney

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - Clinical effectiveness (CE) and evidence-based practice (EBP) are the cornerstone of modern-day health care. Although many studies have explored attitudes and perceived knowledge of individual professions, few have compared these factors between professional groups, especially in the allied health professions (AHP) and health science services (HSS). We report a study comparing the knowledge and practice of 14 different professional groups from the AHP and HSS in terms of EBP and CE. The aim was to highlight any differences between the 14 professional groups along with the needs of the groups. A postal questionnaire survey was completed by a random sample of 1,000 members of AHP and HSS across the United Kingdom. There were significant differences between professional groups with, in general, professionals from the HSS groups rating their knowledge and application of CE and EBP as lower than members of the AHP. Differences were also noted between individual professional groups. For example, podiatrists, radiographers, and orthoptists reported having less knowledge of CE and EBP than physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dietitians, speech and language therapists, and psychologists. Barriers to implementing EBP were similar for all groups, with lack of both time and money cited as the main issues. A number of differences between professions were recorded that highlight the difference in educational and policy approach required for greater uptake of EBP.

AB - Clinical effectiveness (CE) and evidence-based practice (EBP) are the cornerstone of modern-day health care. Although many studies have explored attitudes and perceived knowledge of individual professions, few have compared these factors between professional groups, especially in the allied health professions (AHP) and health science services (HSS). We report a study comparing the knowledge and practice of 14 different professional groups from the AHP and HSS in terms of EBP and CE. The aim was to highlight any differences between the 14 professional groups along with the needs of the groups. A postal questionnaire survey was completed by a random sample of 1,000 members of AHP and HSS across the United Kingdom. There were significant differences between professional groups with, in general, professionals from the HSS groups rating their knowledge and application of CE and EBP as lower than members of the AHP. Differences were also noted between individual professional groups. For example, podiatrists, radiographers, and orthoptists reported having less knowledge of CE and EBP than physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dietitians, speech and language therapists, and psychologists. Barriers to implementing EBP were similar for all groups, with lack of both time and money cited as the main issues. A number of differences between professions were recorded that highlight the difference in educational and policy approach required for greater uptake of EBP.

KW - Allied Health Personnel Education

KW - Allied Health Personnel United Kingdom

KW - Clinical Competence

KW - Confidence Intervals

KW - Descriptive Statistics

KW - Female

KW - Health Knowledge

KW - Health Occupations

KW - Health Personnel Education

KW - Human

KW - Male

KW - Medical Practice, Evidence-Based

KW - One-Way Analysis of Variance

KW - Post Hoc Analysis

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Summated Rating Scaling

KW - Surveys

KW - Test-Retest Reliability

KW - United Kingdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749364045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 127

EP - 133

JO - Journal of Allied Health

JF - Journal of Allied Health

SN - 0090-7421

IS - 3

ER -