Large-scale expansion of no-take closures within the Great Barrier Reef has not enhanced fishery production

W. J. Fletcher, Robert Kearney, W. J. Fletcher, W. J. Nash

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A rare opportunity to test hypotheses about potential fishery benefits of largescale closures was initiated in July 2004 when an additional 28.4% of the 348 000 km2 Great Barrier Reef (GBR) region of Queensland, Australia was closed to all fishing. Advice to the Australian and Queensland governments that supported this initiative predicted these additional closures would generate minimal (10%) initial reductions in both catch and landed value within the GBR area, with recovery of catches becoming apparent after three years. To test these predictions, commercial fisheries data from the GBR area and from the two adjacent (non-GBR) areas of Queensland were compared for the periods immediately before and after the closures were implemented. The observed means for total annual catch and value within the GBR declined from preclosure (2000-2003) levels of 12 780 Mg and Australian $160 million, to initial post-closure (2005-2008) levels of 8143 Mg and $102 million; decreases of 35% and 36% respectively. Because the reference areas in the non-GBR had minimal changes in catch and value, the beyond-BACI (before, after, control, impact) analyses estimated initial net reductions within the GBR of 35% for both total catch and value. There was no evidence of recovery in total catch levels or any comparative improvement in catch rates within the GBR nine years after implementation. These results are not consistent with the advice to governments that the closures would have minimal initial impacts and rapidly generate benefits to fisheries in the GBR through increased juvenile recruitment and adult spillovers. Instead, the absence of evidence of recovery in catches to date currently supports an alternative hypothesis that where there is already effective fisheries management, the closing of areas to all fishing will generate reductions in overall catches similar to the percentage of the fished area that is closed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1187-1196
    Number of pages10
    JournalEcological Applications
    Volume25
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    fishery production
    barrier reef
    fishing
    fishery
    fishery management

    Cite this

    Fletcher, W. J. ; Kearney, Robert ; Fletcher, W. J. ; Nash, W. J. / Large-scale expansion of no-take closures within the Great Barrier Reef has not enhanced fishery production. In: Ecological Applications. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 1187-1196.
    @article{f58e6e0daadd4beca9d8f820985ccc42,
    title = "Large-scale expansion of no-take closures within the Great Barrier Reef has not enhanced fishery production",
    abstract = "A rare opportunity to test hypotheses about potential fishery benefits of largescale closures was initiated in July 2004 when an additional 28.4{\%} of the 348 000 km2 Great Barrier Reef (GBR) region of Queensland, Australia was closed to all fishing. Advice to the Australian and Queensland governments that supported this initiative predicted these additional closures would generate minimal (10{\%}) initial reductions in both catch and landed value within the GBR area, with recovery of catches becoming apparent after three years. To test these predictions, commercial fisheries data from the GBR area and from the two adjacent (non-GBR) areas of Queensland were compared for the periods immediately before and after the closures were implemented. The observed means for total annual catch and value within the GBR declined from preclosure (2000-2003) levels of 12 780 Mg and Australian $160 million, to initial post-closure (2005-2008) levels of 8143 Mg and $102 million; decreases of 35{\%} and 36{\%} respectively. Because the reference areas in the non-GBR had minimal changes in catch and value, the beyond-BACI (before, after, control, impact) analyses estimated initial net reductions within the GBR of 35{\%} for both total catch and value. There was no evidence of recovery in total catch levels or any comparative improvement in catch rates within the GBR nine years after implementation. These results are not consistent with the advice to governments that the closures would have minimal initial impacts and rapidly generate benefits to fisheries in the GBR through increased juvenile recruitment and adult spillovers. Instead, the absence of evidence of recovery in catches to date currently supports an alternative hypothesis that where there is already effective fisheries management, the closing of areas to all fishing will generate reductions in overall catches similar to the percentage of the fished area that is closed.",
    keywords = "Beyond-BACI, Closed areas, Fish production, Fishery benefits, Fishery impacts, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia, Marine protected areas, No-take closures, Sanctuary zones, fishery benefits, no-take closures, closed areas, beyond-BACI, sanctuary zones, marine protected areas, fish production, fishery impacts",
    author = "Fletcher, {W. J.} and Robert Kearney and Fletcher, {W. J.} and Nash, {W. J.}",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1890/14-1427.1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "25",
    pages = "1187--1196",
    journal = "Ecological Applications",
    issn = "1051-0761",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "5",

    }

    Large-scale expansion of no-take closures within the Great Barrier Reef has not enhanced fishery production. / Fletcher, W. J.; Kearney, Robert; Fletcher, W. J.; Nash, W. J.

    In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2015, p. 1187-1196.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Large-scale expansion of no-take closures within the Great Barrier Reef has not enhanced fishery production

    AU - Fletcher, W. J.

    AU - Kearney, Robert

    AU - Fletcher, W. J.

    AU - Nash, W. J.

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - A rare opportunity to test hypotheses about potential fishery benefits of largescale closures was initiated in July 2004 when an additional 28.4% of the 348 000 km2 Great Barrier Reef (GBR) region of Queensland, Australia was closed to all fishing. Advice to the Australian and Queensland governments that supported this initiative predicted these additional closures would generate minimal (10%) initial reductions in both catch and landed value within the GBR area, with recovery of catches becoming apparent after three years. To test these predictions, commercial fisheries data from the GBR area and from the two adjacent (non-GBR) areas of Queensland were compared for the periods immediately before and after the closures were implemented. The observed means for total annual catch and value within the GBR declined from preclosure (2000-2003) levels of 12 780 Mg and Australian $160 million, to initial post-closure (2005-2008) levels of 8143 Mg and $102 million; decreases of 35% and 36% respectively. Because the reference areas in the non-GBR had minimal changes in catch and value, the beyond-BACI (before, after, control, impact) analyses estimated initial net reductions within the GBR of 35% for both total catch and value. There was no evidence of recovery in total catch levels or any comparative improvement in catch rates within the GBR nine years after implementation. These results are not consistent with the advice to governments that the closures would have minimal initial impacts and rapidly generate benefits to fisheries in the GBR through increased juvenile recruitment and adult spillovers. Instead, the absence of evidence of recovery in catches to date currently supports an alternative hypothesis that where there is already effective fisheries management, the closing of areas to all fishing will generate reductions in overall catches similar to the percentage of the fished area that is closed.

    AB - A rare opportunity to test hypotheses about potential fishery benefits of largescale closures was initiated in July 2004 when an additional 28.4% of the 348 000 km2 Great Barrier Reef (GBR) region of Queensland, Australia was closed to all fishing. Advice to the Australian and Queensland governments that supported this initiative predicted these additional closures would generate minimal (10%) initial reductions in both catch and landed value within the GBR area, with recovery of catches becoming apparent after three years. To test these predictions, commercial fisheries data from the GBR area and from the two adjacent (non-GBR) areas of Queensland were compared for the periods immediately before and after the closures were implemented. The observed means for total annual catch and value within the GBR declined from preclosure (2000-2003) levels of 12 780 Mg and Australian $160 million, to initial post-closure (2005-2008) levels of 8143 Mg and $102 million; decreases of 35% and 36% respectively. Because the reference areas in the non-GBR had minimal changes in catch and value, the beyond-BACI (before, after, control, impact) analyses estimated initial net reductions within the GBR of 35% for both total catch and value. There was no evidence of recovery in total catch levels or any comparative improvement in catch rates within the GBR nine years after implementation. These results are not consistent with the advice to governments that the closures would have minimal initial impacts and rapidly generate benefits to fisheries in the GBR through increased juvenile recruitment and adult spillovers. Instead, the absence of evidence of recovery in catches to date currently supports an alternative hypothesis that where there is already effective fisheries management, the closing of areas to all fishing will generate reductions in overall catches similar to the percentage of the fished area that is closed.

    KW - Beyond-BACI

    KW - Closed areas

    KW - Fish production

    KW - Fishery benefits

    KW - Fishery impacts

    KW - Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia

    KW - Marine protected areas

    KW - No-take closures

    KW - Sanctuary zones

    KW - fishery benefits

    KW - no-take closures

    KW - closed areas

    KW - beyond-BACI

    KW - sanctuary zones

    KW - marine protected areas

    KW - fish production

    KW - fishery impacts

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938350276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/largescale-expansion-notake-closures-within-great-barrier-reef-not-enhanced-fishery-production

    U2 - 10.1890/14-1427.1

    DO - 10.1890/14-1427.1

    M3 - Article

    VL - 25

    SP - 1187

    EP - 1196

    JO - Ecological Applications

    JF - Ecological Applications

    SN - 1051-0761

    IS - 5

    ER -