Learning by Doing: the case of administrative policy transfer in China

Yanzhe Zhang, David MARSH

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article explores of the role of policy transfer in facilitating the rise and consolidation of the ‘Reform and Open Door Policy' in China. It builds upon the seminal Dolowitz and Marsh [Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 1996. “Who Learns What From Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 44: 343–357; Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13 (1): 5–23] framework to provide an examination of processes of administrative policy transfer which it argues are broadly indicative of the dynamics of change underpinning the incremental process of reform. It is observed that the reforms under study have not been characterized by rational policy design underpinned by evidence-based policy-making in which issues of cultural assimilation were emphasized. Rather, the implementation process itself has been used to affect processes of adaptation. Policy transfer in China can best be described as learning by doing.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)35-52
    Number of pages18
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume37
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    administrative policy
    China
    learning
    reform
    assimilation
    consolidation
    governance
    examination
    evidence

    Cite this

    @article{16be0fb37c834ba88a1cad99f824a876,
    title = "Learning by Doing: the case of administrative policy transfer in China",
    abstract = "This article explores of the role of policy transfer in facilitating the rise and consolidation of the ‘Reform and Open Door Policy' in China. It builds upon the seminal Dolowitz and Marsh [Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 1996. “Who Learns What From Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 44: 343–357; Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13 (1): 5–23] framework to provide an examination of processes of administrative policy transfer which it argues are broadly indicative of the dynamics of change underpinning the incremental process of reform. It is observed that the reforms under study have not been characterized by rational policy design underpinned by evidence-based policy-making in which issues of cultural assimilation were emphasized. Rather, the implementation process itself has been used to affect processes of adaptation. Policy transfer in China can best be described as learning by doing.",
    keywords = "China, incrementalism, implementation, policy transfer, Reform and Open Door Policy",
    author = "Yanzhe Zhang and David MARSH",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2015.1107959",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "35--52",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    Learning by Doing: the case of administrative policy transfer in China. / Zhang, Yanzhe; MARSH, David.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2016, p. 35-52.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Learning by Doing: the case of administrative policy transfer in China

    AU - Zhang, Yanzhe

    AU - MARSH, David

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - This article explores of the role of policy transfer in facilitating the rise and consolidation of the ‘Reform and Open Door Policy' in China. It builds upon the seminal Dolowitz and Marsh [Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 1996. “Who Learns What From Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 44: 343–357; Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13 (1): 5–23] framework to provide an examination of processes of administrative policy transfer which it argues are broadly indicative of the dynamics of change underpinning the incremental process of reform. It is observed that the reforms under study have not been characterized by rational policy design underpinned by evidence-based policy-making in which issues of cultural assimilation were emphasized. Rather, the implementation process itself has been used to affect processes of adaptation. Policy transfer in China can best be described as learning by doing.

    AB - This article explores of the role of policy transfer in facilitating the rise and consolidation of the ‘Reform and Open Door Policy' in China. It builds upon the seminal Dolowitz and Marsh [Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 1996. “Who Learns What From Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 44: 343–357; Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13 (1): 5–23] framework to provide an examination of processes of administrative policy transfer which it argues are broadly indicative of the dynamics of change underpinning the incremental process of reform. It is observed that the reforms under study have not been characterized by rational policy design underpinned by evidence-based policy-making in which issues of cultural assimilation were emphasized. Rather, the implementation process itself has been used to affect processes of adaptation. Policy transfer in China can best be described as learning by doing.

    KW - China

    KW - incrementalism

    KW - implementation

    KW - policy transfer

    KW - Reform and Open Door Policy

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2015.1107959

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2015.1107959

    M3 - Article

    VL - 37

    SP - 35

    EP - 52

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 2

    ER -