Learning Complex Texture Discrimination

Jessica Herrington, Ted Maddess, Dominique Coy, Corinne F. Carle, Faran SABETI, Marconi Barbosa

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstract

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Different isotrigon texture types are only discriminable from random binary patterns and each other by their third and higher-order spatial correlations. Their mean contrast and spatial frequency content is identical to random noise. Our ability to make these discriminations has be proposed to be innate. We previously investigated learning of 17 isotrigon types in seven naïve subjects, where each type was tested in 14 sessions over 6 weeks. Significant learning was observed. Here we examined if 7 learning sessions conducted every 30 minutes on one day achieved similar learning. We also tested participants at a recall session, 2.5 months later. We used 11 naïve subjects with normal vision. We examined discrimination from random patterns of a subset of 5 of the original texture types, with 16 4AFC repeats/texture/session (5*11*8*16=7040 discriminations). Learning was similar to that achieved in the 6-week sessions. Two of the textures showed significant learning with mean discrimination improvement in probability of correct discrimination of 0.125 ± 0.058 to 0.244 ± 0.089 (p = 0.03 and 0.01). The textures that showed significant learning were the Cross-Even and Wolf-Odd type. However, both of these textures showed a reduction in learning at the final recall session. It appears that the number of discriminations, rather than the duration of the learning period is the key factor in learning differences in texture appearance based upon higher order spatial correlations. Initial performance was not chance so there appears to be some innate ability in naïve subjects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-1
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018
Externally publishedYes
EventVision Sciences Society 18th Annual Meeting - TradeWinds Island Resort, St. Pete Beach, United States
Duration: 18 May 201823 May 2018

Fingerprint

Learning
Aptitude
Discrimination (Psychology)

Cite this

Herrington, J., Maddess, T., Coy, D., Carle, C. F., SABETI, F., & Barbosa, M. (2018). Learning Complex Texture Discrimination. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.260
Herrington, Jessica ; Maddess, Ted ; Coy, Dominique ; Carle, Corinne F. ; SABETI, Faran ; Barbosa, Marconi. / Learning Complex Texture Discrimination. In: Journal of Vision. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 10. pp. 1-1.
@article{43e6dbb750c44527b73e02e3c721e139,
title = "Learning Complex Texture Discrimination",
abstract = "Different isotrigon texture types are only discriminable from random binary patterns and each other by their third and higher-order spatial correlations. Their mean contrast and spatial frequency content is identical to random noise. Our ability to make these discriminations has be proposed to be innate. We previously investigated learning of 17 isotrigon types in seven na{\"i}ve subjects, where each type was tested in 14 sessions over 6 weeks. Significant learning was observed. Here we examined if 7 learning sessions conducted every 30 minutes on one day achieved similar learning. We also tested participants at a recall session, 2.5 months later. We used 11 na{\"i}ve subjects with normal vision. We examined discrimination from random patterns of a subset of 5 of the original texture types, with 16 4AFC repeats/texture/session (5*11*8*16=7040 discriminations). Learning was similar to that achieved in the 6-week sessions. Two of the textures showed significant learning with mean discrimination improvement in probability of correct discrimination of 0.125 ± 0.058 to 0.244 ± 0.089 (p = 0.03 and 0.01). The textures that showed significant learning were the Cross-Even and Wolf-Odd type. However, both of these textures showed a reduction in learning at the final recall session. It appears that the number of discriminations, rather than the duration of the learning period is the key factor in learning differences in texture appearance based upon higher order spatial correlations. Initial performance was not chance so there appears to be some innate ability in na{\"i}ve subjects.",
author = "Jessica Herrington and Ted Maddess and Dominique Coy and Carle, {Corinne F.} and Faran SABETI and Marconi Barbosa",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1167/18.10.260",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1--1",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "10",

}

Herrington, J, Maddess, T, Coy, D, Carle, CF, SABETI, F & Barbosa, M 2018, 'Learning Complex Texture Discrimination', Journal of Vision, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.260

Learning Complex Texture Discrimination. / Herrington, Jessica; Maddess, Ted; Coy, Dominique; Carle, Corinne F.; SABETI, Faran; Barbosa, Marconi.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 18, No. 10, 09.2018, p. 1-1.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstract

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning Complex Texture Discrimination

AU - Herrington, Jessica

AU - Maddess, Ted

AU - Coy, Dominique

AU - Carle, Corinne F.

AU - SABETI, Faran

AU - Barbosa, Marconi

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Different isotrigon texture types are only discriminable from random binary patterns and each other by their third and higher-order spatial correlations. Their mean contrast and spatial frequency content is identical to random noise. Our ability to make these discriminations has be proposed to be innate. We previously investigated learning of 17 isotrigon types in seven naïve subjects, where each type was tested in 14 sessions over 6 weeks. Significant learning was observed. Here we examined if 7 learning sessions conducted every 30 minutes on one day achieved similar learning. We also tested participants at a recall session, 2.5 months later. We used 11 naïve subjects with normal vision. We examined discrimination from random patterns of a subset of 5 of the original texture types, with 16 4AFC repeats/texture/session (5*11*8*16=7040 discriminations). Learning was similar to that achieved in the 6-week sessions. Two of the textures showed significant learning with mean discrimination improvement in probability of correct discrimination of 0.125 ± 0.058 to 0.244 ± 0.089 (p = 0.03 and 0.01). The textures that showed significant learning were the Cross-Even and Wolf-Odd type. However, both of these textures showed a reduction in learning at the final recall session. It appears that the number of discriminations, rather than the duration of the learning period is the key factor in learning differences in texture appearance based upon higher order spatial correlations. Initial performance was not chance so there appears to be some innate ability in naïve subjects.

AB - Different isotrigon texture types are only discriminable from random binary patterns and each other by their third and higher-order spatial correlations. Their mean contrast and spatial frequency content is identical to random noise. Our ability to make these discriminations has be proposed to be innate. We previously investigated learning of 17 isotrigon types in seven naïve subjects, where each type was tested in 14 sessions over 6 weeks. Significant learning was observed. Here we examined if 7 learning sessions conducted every 30 minutes on one day achieved similar learning. We also tested participants at a recall session, 2.5 months later. We used 11 naïve subjects with normal vision. We examined discrimination from random patterns of a subset of 5 of the original texture types, with 16 4AFC repeats/texture/session (5*11*8*16=7040 discriminations). Learning was similar to that achieved in the 6-week sessions. Two of the textures showed significant learning with mean discrimination improvement in probability of correct discrimination of 0.125 ± 0.058 to 0.244 ± 0.089 (p = 0.03 and 0.01). The textures that showed significant learning were the Cross-Even and Wolf-Odd type. However, both of these textures showed a reduction in learning at the final recall session. It appears that the number of discriminations, rather than the duration of the learning period is the key factor in learning differences in texture appearance based upon higher order spatial correlations. Initial performance was not chance so there appears to be some innate ability in naïve subjects.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/learning-complex-texture-discrimination

U2 - 10.1167/18.10.260

DO - 10.1167/18.10.260

M3 - Meeting Abstract

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 1

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 10

ER -

Herrington J, Maddess T, Coy D, Carle CF, SABETI F, Barbosa M. Learning Complex Texture Discrimination. Journal of Vision. 2018 Sep;18(10):1-1. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.260