Learning from failures: testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization

Jeffrey Diez, Peter Williams, Rod Randall, Jon Sullivan, Philip Hulme, Richard Duncan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    77 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Our understanding of broad taxonomic patterns of plant naturalizations is based entirely on observations of successful naturalizations. Omission of the failures, however, can introduce bias by conflating the probabilities of introduction and naturalization. Here, we use two comprehensive datasets of successful and failed plant naturalizations in New Zealand and Australia for a unique, flora-wide comparative test of several major invasion hypotheses. First, we show that some taxa are consistently more successful at naturalizing in these two countries, despite their environmental differences. Broad climatic origins helped to explain some of the differences in success rates in the two countries. We further show that species with native relatives were generally more successful in both countries, contrary to Darwins naturalization hypothesis, but this effect was inconsistent among families across the two countries. Finally, we show that contrary to studies based on successful naturalizations only, islands need not be inherently more invasible than continents.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1174-1183
    Number of pages10
    JournalEcology Letters
    Volume12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    naturalization
    learning
    flora
    testing

    Cite this

    Diez, Jeffrey ; Williams, Peter ; Randall, Rod ; Sullivan, Jon ; Hulme, Philip ; Duncan, Richard. / Learning from failures: testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization. In: Ecology Letters. 2009 ; Vol. 12. pp. 1174-1183.
    @article{809192a9c4e246678000606c40bcffc7,
    title = "Learning from failures: testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization",
    abstract = "Our understanding of broad taxonomic patterns of plant naturalizations is based entirely on observations of successful naturalizations. Omission of the failures, however, can introduce bias by conflating the probabilities of introduction and naturalization. Here, we use two comprehensive datasets of successful and failed plant naturalizations in New Zealand and Australia for a unique, flora-wide comparative test of several major invasion hypotheses. First, we show that some taxa are consistently more successful at naturalizing in these two countries, despite their environmental differences. Broad climatic origins helped to explain some of the differences in success rates in the two countries. We further show that species with native relatives were generally more successful in both countries, contrary to Darwins naturalization hypothesis, but this effect was inconsistent among families across the two countries. Finally, we show that contrary to studies based on successful naturalizations only, islands need not be inherently more invasible than continents.",
    keywords = "Darwin's naturalization hypothesis, island–continent invasion patterns, taxonomic patterns of naturalization.",
    author = "Jeffrey Diez and Peter Williams and Rod Randall and Jon Sullivan and Philip Hulme and Richard Duncan",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01376.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "1174--1183",
    journal = "Ecology Letters",
    issn = "1461-023X",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

    }

    Learning from failures: testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization. / Diez, Jeffrey; Williams, Peter; Randall, Rod; Sullivan, Jon; Hulme, Philip; Duncan, Richard.

    In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 12, 2009, p. 1174-1183.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Learning from failures: testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization

    AU - Diez, Jeffrey

    AU - Williams, Peter

    AU - Randall, Rod

    AU - Sullivan, Jon

    AU - Hulme, Philip

    AU - Duncan, Richard

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - Our understanding of broad taxonomic patterns of plant naturalizations is based entirely on observations of successful naturalizations. Omission of the failures, however, can introduce bias by conflating the probabilities of introduction and naturalization. Here, we use two comprehensive datasets of successful and failed plant naturalizations in New Zealand and Australia for a unique, flora-wide comparative test of several major invasion hypotheses. First, we show that some taxa are consistently more successful at naturalizing in these two countries, despite their environmental differences. Broad climatic origins helped to explain some of the differences in success rates in the two countries. We further show that species with native relatives were generally more successful in both countries, contrary to Darwins naturalization hypothesis, but this effect was inconsistent among families across the two countries. Finally, we show that contrary to studies based on successful naturalizations only, islands need not be inherently more invasible than continents.

    AB - Our understanding of broad taxonomic patterns of plant naturalizations is based entirely on observations of successful naturalizations. Omission of the failures, however, can introduce bias by conflating the probabilities of introduction and naturalization. Here, we use two comprehensive datasets of successful and failed plant naturalizations in New Zealand and Australia for a unique, flora-wide comparative test of several major invasion hypotheses. First, we show that some taxa are consistently more successful at naturalizing in these two countries, despite their environmental differences. Broad climatic origins helped to explain some of the differences in success rates in the two countries. We further show that species with native relatives were generally more successful in both countries, contrary to Darwins naturalization hypothesis, but this effect was inconsistent among families across the two countries. Finally, we show that contrary to studies based on successful naturalizations only, islands need not be inherently more invasible than continents.

    KW - Darwin's naturalization hypothesis

    KW - island–continent invasion patterns

    KW - taxonomic patterns of naturalization.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01376.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01376.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 1174

    EP - 1183

    JO - Ecology Letters

    JF - Ecology Letters

    SN - 1461-023X

    ER -