Learning preference as a predictor of academic performance in first year accelerated graduate entry nursing students

A prospective follow-up study

Jane Koch, Yenna Salamonson, John X. Rolley, Patricia M. Davidson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The growth of accelerated graduate entry nursing programs has challenged traditional approaches to teaching and learning. To date, limited research has been undertaken in the role of learning preferences, language proficiency and academic performance in accelerated programs. Sixty-two first year accelerated graduate entry nursing students, in a single cohort at a university in the western region of Sydney, Australia, were surveyed to assess their learning preference using the Visual, Aural, Read/write and Kinaesthetic (VARK) learning preference questionnaire, together with sociodemographic data, English language acculturation and perceived academic control. Six months following course commencement, the participant's grade point average (GPA) was studied as a measurement of academic performance. A 93% response rate was achieved. The majority of students (62%) reported preference for multiple approaches to learning with the kinaesthetic sensory mode a significant (p=0.009) predictor of academic performance. Students who spoke only English at home had higher mean scores across two of the four categories of VARK sensory modalities, visual and kinaesthetic compared to those who spoke non-English. Further research is warranted to investigate the reasons why the kinaesthetic sensory mode is a predictor of academic performance and to what extent the VARK mean scores of the four learning preference(s) change with improved English language proficiency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-616
Number of pages6
JournalNurse Education Today
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing Students
nursing
graduate
Learning
learning
performance
Ear
Language
student
English language
Students
Acculturation
acculturation
Research
Teaching
Nursing
questionnaire
university
Growth
language

Cite this

@article{5e16ddcd33b14017b3ad33972e67a519,
title = "Learning preference as a predictor of academic performance in first year accelerated graduate entry nursing students: A prospective follow-up study",
abstract = "The growth of accelerated graduate entry nursing programs has challenged traditional approaches to teaching and learning. To date, limited research has been undertaken in the role of learning preferences, language proficiency and academic performance in accelerated programs. Sixty-two first year accelerated graduate entry nursing students, in a single cohort at a university in the western region of Sydney, Australia, were surveyed to assess their learning preference using the Visual, Aural, Read/write and Kinaesthetic (VARK) learning preference questionnaire, together with sociodemographic data, English language acculturation and perceived academic control. Six months following course commencement, the participant's grade point average (GPA) was studied as a measurement of academic performance. A 93{\%} response rate was achieved. The majority of students (62{\%}) reported preference for multiple approaches to learning with the kinaesthetic sensory mode a significant (p=0.009) predictor of academic performance. Students who spoke only English at home had higher mean scores across two of the four categories of VARK sensory modalities, visual and kinaesthetic compared to those who spoke non-English. Further research is warranted to investigate the reasons why the kinaesthetic sensory mode is a predictor of academic performance and to what extent the VARK mean scores of the four learning preference(s) change with improved English language proficiency.",
keywords = "Academic performance, Accelerated graduate entry nursing students, English as a second language (ESL), Learning preference",
author = "Jane Koch and Yenna Salamonson and Rolley, {John X.} and Davidson, {Patricia M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.019",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "611--616",
journal = "Nurse Education Today",
issn = "0260-6917",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "6",

}

Learning preference as a predictor of academic performance in first year accelerated graduate entry nursing students : A prospective follow-up study. / Koch, Jane; Salamonson, Yenna; Rolley, John X.; Davidson, Patricia M.

In: Nurse Education Today, Vol. 31, No. 6, 08.2011, p. 611-616.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning preference as a predictor of academic performance in first year accelerated graduate entry nursing students

T2 - A prospective follow-up study

AU - Koch, Jane

AU - Salamonson, Yenna

AU - Rolley, John X.

AU - Davidson, Patricia M.

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - The growth of accelerated graduate entry nursing programs has challenged traditional approaches to teaching and learning. To date, limited research has been undertaken in the role of learning preferences, language proficiency and academic performance in accelerated programs. Sixty-two first year accelerated graduate entry nursing students, in a single cohort at a university in the western region of Sydney, Australia, were surveyed to assess their learning preference using the Visual, Aural, Read/write and Kinaesthetic (VARK) learning preference questionnaire, together with sociodemographic data, English language acculturation and perceived academic control. Six months following course commencement, the participant's grade point average (GPA) was studied as a measurement of academic performance. A 93% response rate was achieved. The majority of students (62%) reported preference for multiple approaches to learning with the kinaesthetic sensory mode a significant (p=0.009) predictor of academic performance. Students who spoke only English at home had higher mean scores across two of the four categories of VARK sensory modalities, visual and kinaesthetic compared to those who spoke non-English. Further research is warranted to investigate the reasons why the kinaesthetic sensory mode is a predictor of academic performance and to what extent the VARK mean scores of the four learning preference(s) change with improved English language proficiency.

AB - The growth of accelerated graduate entry nursing programs has challenged traditional approaches to teaching and learning. To date, limited research has been undertaken in the role of learning preferences, language proficiency and academic performance in accelerated programs. Sixty-two first year accelerated graduate entry nursing students, in a single cohort at a university in the western region of Sydney, Australia, were surveyed to assess their learning preference using the Visual, Aural, Read/write and Kinaesthetic (VARK) learning preference questionnaire, together with sociodemographic data, English language acculturation and perceived academic control. Six months following course commencement, the participant's grade point average (GPA) was studied as a measurement of academic performance. A 93% response rate was achieved. The majority of students (62%) reported preference for multiple approaches to learning with the kinaesthetic sensory mode a significant (p=0.009) predictor of academic performance. Students who spoke only English at home had higher mean scores across two of the four categories of VARK sensory modalities, visual and kinaesthetic compared to those who spoke non-English. Further research is warranted to investigate the reasons why the kinaesthetic sensory mode is a predictor of academic performance and to what extent the VARK mean scores of the four learning preference(s) change with improved English language proficiency.

KW - Academic performance

KW - Accelerated graduate entry nursing students

KW - English as a second language (ESL)

KW - Learning preference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960165302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.019

DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.019

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 611

EP - 616

JO - Nurse Education Today

JF - Nurse Education Today

SN - 0260-6917

IS - 6

ER -