Learning the hard way: a case study of an attempt at agricultural transformation in response to climate change

Emma Jakku, Peter Thorburn, Nadine Marshall, Anne-Maree Dowd, Mark Howden, E. Mendham, Katie MOON, C. Brandon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There is increasing interest in transformational adaptation to climate change in agriculture, i.e. adaptation that involves large-scale, novel responses to reduce vulnerability to climate risks. Transformational adaptation is less well understood than incremental adaptation, since there are few studies of agricultural enterprises making transformative changes in response to climatic change. This paper is an in-depth study of an agricultural company’s attempt to implement transformational adaptation in response to climate change. We document the Peanut Company of Australia’s (PCA) response to predicted climatic change by expanding its operations into Katherine, Northern Territory, after decades of below-average rainfall in their traditional production region in south-east Queensland. Our research question was: what conditions and processes influenced the outcome of the company’s response? We conducted 37 semi-structured interviews with company, government and community representatives to examine diverse perspectives on PCA’s expansion into Katherine and its subsequent strategic retreat. To reveal insights into why, when and how this attempted transformational adaptation occurred we reviewed the literature and identified Park et al.’s (2012) Adaptation Action Cycles (AAC) framework and aspects from the organisational adaptation literature as useful for our analysis. Based on our findings, we revised the AAC framework to better reflect the way that incremental adaptation in situ can occur simultaneously with transformational adaptation at a new location. Our study illustrates that transformational adaptation in agriculture is difficult, complex, risky and costly and sometimes unsuccessful, revealing some of the challenges of and barriers to organisational adaptation in agriculture, especially when moving to a new location.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)557-574
    Number of pages18
    JournalClimatic Change
    Volume137
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    learning
    climate change
    agriculture
    vulnerability
    rainfall
    climate

    Cite this

    Jakku, E., Thorburn, P., Marshall, N., Dowd, A-M., Howden, M., Mendham, E., ... Brandon, C. (2016). Learning the hard way: a case study of an attempt at agricultural transformation in response to climate change. Climatic Change, 137(3-4), 557-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1698-x
    Jakku, Emma ; Thorburn, Peter ; Marshall, Nadine ; Dowd, Anne-Maree ; Howden, Mark ; Mendham, E. ; MOON, Katie ; Brandon, C. / Learning the hard way: a case study of an attempt at agricultural transformation in response to climate change. In: Climatic Change. 2016 ; Vol. 137, No. 3-4. pp. 557-574.
    @article{7f7c4dac458445deb972c8efb950f801,
    title = "Learning the hard way: a case study of an attempt at agricultural transformation in response to climate change",
    abstract = "There is increasing interest in transformational adaptation to climate change in agriculture, i.e. adaptation that involves large-scale, novel responses to reduce vulnerability to climate risks. Transformational adaptation is less well understood than incremental adaptation, since there are few studies of agricultural enterprises making transformative changes in response to climatic change. This paper is an in-depth study of an agricultural company’s attempt to implement transformational adaptation in response to climate change. We document the Peanut Company of Australia’s (PCA) response to predicted climatic change by expanding its operations into Katherine, Northern Territory, after decades of below-average rainfall in their traditional production region in south-east Queensland. Our research question was: what conditions and processes influenced the outcome of the company’s response? We conducted 37 semi-structured interviews with company, government and community representatives to examine diverse perspectives on PCA’s expansion into Katherine and its subsequent strategic retreat. To reveal insights into why, when and how this attempted transformational adaptation occurred we reviewed the literature and identified Park et al.’s (2012) Adaptation Action Cycles (AAC) framework and aspects from the organisational adaptation literature as useful for our analysis. Based on our findings, we revised the AAC framework to better reflect the way that incremental adaptation in situ can occur simultaneously with transformational adaptation at a new location. Our study illustrates that transformational adaptation in agriculture is difficult, complex, risky and costly and sometimes unsuccessful, revealing some of the challenges of and barriers to organisational adaptation in agriculture, especially when moving to a new location.",
    author = "Emma Jakku and Peter Thorburn and Nadine Marshall and Anne-Maree Dowd and Mark Howden and E. Mendham and Katie MOON and C. Brandon",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1007/s10584-016-1698-x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "137",
    pages = "557--574",
    journal = "Climatic Change",
    issn = "0165-0009",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "3-4",

    }

    Jakku, E, Thorburn, P, Marshall, N, Dowd, A-M, Howden, M, Mendham, E, MOON, K & Brandon, C 2016, 'Learning the hard way: a case study of an attempt at agricultural transformation in response to climate change', Climatic Change, vol. 137, no. 3-4, pp. 557-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1698-x

    Learning the hard way: a case study of an attempt at agricultural transformation in response to climate change. / Jakku, Emma; Thorburn, Peter; Marshall, Nadine; Dowd, Anne-Maree; Howden, Mark; Mendham, E.; MOON, Katie; Brandon, C.

    In: Climatic Change, Vol. 137, No. 3-4, 2016, p. 557-574.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Learning the hard way: a case study of an attempt at agricultural transformation in response to climate change

    AU - Jakku, Emma

    AU - Thorburn, Peter

    AU - Marshall, Nadine

    AU - Dowd, Anne-Maree

    AU - Howden, Mark

    AU - Mendham, E.

    AU - MOON, Katie

    AU - Brandon, C.

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - There is increasing interest in transformational adaptation to climate change in agriculture, i.e. adaptation that involves large-scale, novel responses to reduce vulnerability to climate risks. Transformational adaptation is less well understood than incremental adaptation, since there are few studies of agricultural enterprises making transformative changes in response to climatic change. This paper is an in-depth study of an agricultural company’s attempt to implement transformational adaptation in response to climate change. We document the Peanut Company of Australia’s (PCA) response to predicted climatic change by expanding its operations into Katherine, Northern Territory, after decades of below-average rainfall in their traditional production region in south-east Queensland. Our research question was: what conditions and processes influenced the outcome of the company’s response? We conducted 37 semi-structured interviews with company, government and community representatives to examine diverse perspectives on PCA’s expansion into Katherine and its subsequent strategic retreat. To reveal insights into why, when and how this attempted transformational adaptation occurred we reviewed the literature and identified Park et al.’s (2012) Adaptation Action Cycles (AAC) framework and aspects from the organisational adaptation literature as useful for our analysis. Based on our findings, we revised the AAC framework to better reflect the way that incremental adaptation in situ can occur simultaneously with transformational adaptation at a new location. Our study illustrates that transformational adaptation in agriculture is difficult, complex, risky and costly and sometimes unsuccessful, revealing some of the challenges of and barriers to organisational adaptation in agriculture, especially when moving to a new location.

    AB - There is increasing interest in transformational adaptation to climate change in agriculture, i.e. adaptation that involves large-scale, novel responses to reduce vulnerability to climate risks. Transformational adaptation is less well understood than incremental adaptation, since there are few studies of agricultural enterprises making transformative changes in response to climatic change. This paper is an in-depth study of an agricultural company’s attempt to implement transformational adaptation in response to climate change. We document the Peanut Company of Australia’s (PCA) response to predicted climatic change by expanding its operations into Katherine, Northern Territory, after decades of below-average rainfall in their traditional production region in south-east Queensland. Our research question was: what conditions and processes influenced the outcome of the company’s response? We conducted 37 semi-structured interviews with company, government and community representatives to examine diverse perspectives on PCA’s expansion into Katherine and its subsequent strategic retreat. To reveal insights into why, when and how this attempted transformational adaptation occurred we reviewed the literature and identified Park et al.’s (2012) Adaptation Action Cycles (AAC) framework and aspects from the organisational adaptation literature as useful for our analysis. Based on our findings, we revised the AAC framework to better reflect the way that incremental adaptation in situ can occur simultaneously with transformational adaptation at a new location. Our study illustrates that transformational adaptation in agriculture is difficult, complex, risky and costly and sometimes unsuccessful, revealing some of the challenges of and barriers to organisational adaptation in agriculture, especially when moving to a new location.

    U2 - 10.1007/s10584-016-1698-x

    DO - 10.1007/s10584-016-1698-x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 137

    SP - 557

    EP - 574

    JO - Climatic Change

    JF - Climatic Change

    SN - 0165-0009

    IS - 3-4

    ER -