Legacies, lags and long-term trends: Effective flow restoration in a changed and changing world

Ross M Thompson, Alison King, Richard Kingsford, Ralph MAC NALLY, LeRoy POFF

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Human impacts on natural ecosystems are pervasive and will play out more severely as human populations and per capita resource use increase. Freshwater ecosystems are critical for human well-being and experience a diverse range of human-induced pressures. Most river systems throughout the world have much-altered flow regimes. The Murray–Darling Basin in southeastern Australian has been the focus of an extensive water reform process to address the over-allocation of water for human uses. This has included many scientific investigations, hydrological modelling and the development of institutional and market structures to reallocate water. Substantial recovery of water has been achieved, which has been used to restore aspects of the natural flow regime. We reviewed recent papers on responses to flow restoration in the Murray–Darling Basin and complemented this with inferences from the global literature. Ecological responses to flow restoration are often inconsistent, site and taxon specific and difficult to detect. By combining ideas from mainstream thinking in restoration ecology with the insights from our review, we propose a conceptual model for understanding responses to flow restoration. This model incorporates key factors that influence the size of ecological responses to restoration, including existing ecological condition, legacy impacts of past change, interactions with other variables, life-history traits of taxa and broad-scale and long-term trends due to climate or land-use change.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)986-995
    Number of pages10
    JournalFreshwater Biology
    Volume63
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

    Fingerprint

    basins
    restoration ecology
    market structure
    water allocation
    reform process
    water
    ecological restoration
    freshwater ecosystem
    resource use
    basin
    anthropogenic effect
    human population
    land use change
    river system
    anthropogenic activities
    long-term trend
    restoration
    climate
    rivers
    market

    Cite this

    @article{21ce179f43404016a66feeed4a81c673,
    title = "Legacies, lags and long-term trends: Effective flow restoration in a changed and changing world",
    abstract = "Human impacts on natural ecosystems are pervasive and will play out more severely as human populations and per capita resource use increase. Freshwater ecosystems are critical for human well-being and experience a diverse range of human-induced pressures. Most river systems throughout the world have much-altered flow regimes. The Murray–Darling Basin in southeastern Australian has been the focus of an extensive water reform process to address the over-allocation of water for human uses. This has included many scientific investigations, hydrological modelling and the development of institutional and market structures to reallocate water. Substantial recovery of water has been achieved, which has been used to restore aspects of the natural flow regime. We reviewed recent papers on responses to flow restoration in the Murray–Darling Basin and complemented this with inferences from the global literature. Ecological responses to flow restoration are often inconsistent, site and taxon specific and difficult to detect. By combining ideas from mainstream thinking in restoration ecology with the insights from our review, we propose a conceptual model for understanding responses to flow restoration. This model incorporates key factors that influence the size of ecological responses to restoration, including existing ecological condition, legacy impacts of past change, interactions with other variables, life-history traits of taxa and broad-scale and long-term trends due to climate or land-use change.",
    keywords = "antecedent conditions, environmental flows, Murray-Darling Basin, river management, Murray–Darling Basin",
    author = "Thompson, {Ross M} and Alison King and Richard Kingsford and {MAC NALLY}, Ralph and LeRoy POFF",
    year = "2018",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.1111/fwb.13029",
    language = "English",
    volume = "63",
    pages = "986--995",
    journal = "Freshwater Biology",
    issn = "0046-5070",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "8",

    }

    Legacies, lags and long-term trends: Effective flow restoration in a changed and changing world. / Thompson, Ross M; King, Alison; Kingsford, Richard; MAC NALLY, Ralph; POFF, LeRoy.

    In: Freshwater Biology, Vol. 63, No. 8, 08.2018, p. 986-995.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Legacies, lags and long-term trends: Effective flow restoration in a changed and changing world

    AU - Thompson, Ross M

    AU - King, Alison

    AU - Kingsford, Richard

    AU - MAC NALLY, Ralph

    AU - POFF, LeRoy

    PY - 2018/8

    Y1 - 2018/8

    N2 - Human impacts on natural ecosystems are pervasive and will play out more severely as human populations and per capita resource use increase. Freshwater ecosystems are critical for human well-being and experience a diverse range of human-induced pressures. Most river systems throughout the world have much-altered flow regimes. The Murray–Darling Basin in southeastern Australian has been the focus of an extensive water reform process to address the over-allocation of water for human uses. This has included many scientific investigations, hydrological modelling and the development of institutional and market structures to reallocate water. Substantial recovery of water has been achieved, which has been used to restore aspects of the natural flow regime. We reviewed recent papers on responses to flow restoration in the Murray–Darling Basin and complemented this with inferences from the global literature. Ecological responses to flow restoration are often inconsistent, site and taxon specific and difficult to detect. By combining ideas from mainstream thinking in restoration ecology with the insights from our review, we propose a conceptual model for understanding responses to flow restoration. This model incorporates key factors that influence the size of ecological responses to restoration, including existing ecological condition, legacy impacts of past change, interactions with other variables, life-history traits of taxa and broad-scale and long-term trends due to climate or land-use change.

    AB - Human impacts on natural ecosystems are pervasive and will play out more severely as human populations and per capita resource use increase. Freshwater ecosystems are critical for human well-being and experience a diverse range of human-induced pressures. Most river systems throughout the world have much-altered flow regimes. The Murray–Darling Basin in southeastern Australian has been the focus of an extensive water reform process to address the over-allocation of water for human uses. This has included many scientific investigations, hydrological modelling and the development of institutional and market structures to reallocate water. Substantial recovery of water has been achieved, which has been used to restore aspects of the natural flow regime. We reviewed recent papers on responses to flow restoration in the Murray–Darling Basin and complemented this with inferences from the global literature. Ecological responses to flow restoration are often inconsistent, site and taxon specific and difficult to detect. By combining ideas from mainstream thinking in restoration ecology with the insights from our review, we propose a conceptual model for understanding responses to flow restoration. This model incorporates key factors that influence the size of ecological responses to restoration, including existing ecological condition, legacy impacts of past change, interactions with other variables, life-history traits of taxa and broad-scale and long-term trends due to climate or land-use change.

    KW - antecedent conditions

    KW - environmental flows

    KW - Murray-Darling Basin

    KW - river management

    KW - Murray–Darling Basin

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048814897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/fwb.13029

    DO - 10.1111/fwb.13029

    M3 - Article

    VL - 63

    SP - 986

    EP - 995

    JO - Freshwater Biology

    JF - Freshwater Biology

    SN - 0046-5070

    IS - 8

    ER -