@article{9f602ba51a8b43a285f85697c73abe2b,
title = "Lineage diversity within a widespread endemic Australian skink to better inform conservation in response to regional-scale disturbance",
abstract = "Much attention is paid in conservation planning to the concept of a species, to ensure comparability across studies and regions when classifying taxa against criteria of endangerment and setting priorities for action. However, various jurisdictions now allow taxonomic ranks below the level of species and nontaxonomic intraspecific divisions to be factored into conservation planning—subspecies, key populations, evolutionarily significant units, or designatable units. Understanding patterns of genetic diversity and its distribution across the landscape is a key component in the identification of species boundaries and determination of substantial geographic structure within species. A total of 12,532 reliable polymorphic SNP loci were generated from 63 populations (286 individuals) covering the distribution of the Australian eastern three-lined skink, Bassiana duperreyi, to assess genetic population structure in the form of diagnosable lineages and their distribution across the landscape, with particular reference to the recent catastrophic bushfires of eastern Australia. Five well-supported diagnosable operational taxonomic units (OTUs) existed within B. duperreyi. Low levels of divergence of B. duperreyi between mainland Australia and Tasmania (no fixed allelic differences) support the notion of episodic exchange of alleles across Bass Strait (ca 60 m, 25 Kya) during periods of low sea level during the Upper Pleistocene rather than the much longer period of isolation (1.7 My) indicated by earlier studies using mitochondrial sequence variation. Our study provides foundational work for the detailed taxonomic re-evaluation of this species complex and the need for biodiversity assessment to include an examination of cryptic species and/or cryptic diversity below the level of species. Such information on lineage diversity within species and its distribution in the context of disturbance at a regional scale can be factored into conservation planning regardless of whether a decision is made to formally diagnose new species taxonomically and nomenclaturally.",
keywords = "2019–20 Australian bushfires, Bassiana duperreyi, biogeography, DArTSeq, operational taxonomic units, phylogeography",
author = "Dissanayake, {Duminda S.B.} and Holleley, {Clare E.} and Joanna Sumner and Jane Melville and Arthur Georges",
note = "Funding Information: For their assistance with museum collection access and tissue loans, we would like to thank Sally South, Ralph Foster, Steve Donald, Mark Hutchinson of the South Australian Museum, and Katie Date of the Museum Victoria. We are grateful to Lasanthika Thewarage for assistance with fieldwork. Additionally, we would like to thank Leo Joseph and Sally South their valuable comments on early versions of the manuscript. Samples from University of Canberra field trips were performed under UC Animal Ethics approval (AEC 17?26), reciprocally assessed by the CSIRO Wildlife and Large Animal-Animal Ethics Committee, and collected under ACT (LT201826, LT2017956), NSW (SL102002), and Victoria (10008558) permits. This work was funded by Australian Research Council Grants DP110104377 and DP170101147 (awarded to A.G., and C.E.H., and other investigators) and the ACT Herpetological Association (awarded to D.S.B.D.). D.S.B.D. was supported by a Ph.D. Weeden Research Scholarship from the University of Canberra and CSIRO Research Plus Postgraduate Scholarship. Funding Information: For their assistance with museum collection access and tissue loans, we would like to thank Sally South, Ralph Foster, Steve Donald, Mark Hutchinson of the South Australian Museum, and Katie Date of the Museum Victoria. We are grateful to Lasanthika Thewarage for assistance with fieldwork. Additionally, we would like to thank Leo Joseph and Sally South their valuable comments on early versions of the manuscript. Samples from University of Canberra field trips were performed under UC Animal Ethics approval (AEC 17–26), reciprocally assessed by the CSIRO Wildlife and Large Animal‐Animal Ethics Committee, and collected under ACT (LT201826, LT2017956), NSW (SL102002), and Victoria (10008558) permits. This work was funded by Australian Research Council Grants DP110104377 and DP170101147 (awarded to A.G., and C.E.H., and other investigators) and the ACT Herpetological Association (awarded to D.S.B.D.). D.S.B.D. was supported by a Ph.D. Weeden Research Scholarship from the University of Canberra and CSIRO Research Plus Postgraduate Scholarship. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1002/ece3.8627",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "3",
}