Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system

a research agenda

Nicole CURATO, Marit Boker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    38 Citations (Scopus)
    7 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The systemic turn in deliberative democratic theory has shifted the focus away from seeking to design separate, internally deliberative ‘mini-publics’ and towards a new appreciation of their external, systemic quality. Yet, so far, such accounts have not gone beyond recognising a potential for mini-publics to contribute to deliberative systems. In this paper, we argue that a systemic conceptualisation of mini-publics must recognise their fundamentally ambivalent character: Since mini-publics have the potential both to foster and to undermine systemic deliberation, it is insufficient to celebrate their positive potential alone, and vital to develop frameworks that allow for a critical evaluation of minipublics’ systemic role. To this end, we propose a framework based on the systemic qualities of deliberation-making, legitimacy-seeking and capacity-building, and conclude that key to mini-publics’ quality, when judged against these criteria, is not just their own features, but the degree of ‘co-development’ of all system components.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)173-190
    Number of pages18
    JournalPolicy Sciences
    Volume49
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

      Fingerprint

    Cite this