Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system

a research agenda

Nicole CURATO, Marit Boker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    34 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The systemic turn in deliberative democratic theory has shifted the focus away from seeking to design separate, internally deliberative ‘mini-publics’ and towards a new appreciation of their external, systemic quality. Yet, so far, such accounts have not gone beyond recognising a potential for mini-publics to contribute to deliberative systems. In this paper, we argue that a systemic conceptualisation of mini-publics must recognise their fundamentally ambivalent character: Since mini-publics have the potential both to foster and to undermine systemic deliberation, it is insufficient to celebrate their positive potential alone, and vital to develop frameworks that allow for a critical evaluation of minipublics’ systemic role. To this end, we propose a framework based on the systemic qualities of deliberation-making, legitimacy-seeking and capacity-building, and conclude that key to mini-publics’ quality, when judged against these criteria, is not just their own features, but the degree of ‘co-development’ of all system components.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)173-190
    Number of pages18
    JournalPolicy Sciences
    Volume49
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

    Fingerprint

    deliberation
    legitimacy
    evaluation
    capacity building
    public

    Cite this

    @article{fa159d128bfb4aa9acfe2c8c0b5e18fa,
    title = "Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system: a research agenda",
    abstract = "The systemic turn in deliberative democratic theory has shifted the focus away from seeking to design separate, internally deliberative ‘mini-publics’ and towards a new appreciation of their external, systemic quality. Yet, so far, such accounts have not gone beyond recognising a potential for mini-publics to contribute to deliberative systems. In this paper, we argue that a systemic conceptualisation of mini-publics must recognise their fundamentally ambivalent character: Since mini-publics have the potential both to foster and to undermine systemic deliberation, it is insufficient to celebrate their positive potential alone, and vital to develop frameworks that allow for a critical evaluation of minipublics’ systemic role. To this end, we propose a framework based on the systemic qualities of deliberation-making, legitimacy-seeking and capacity-building, and conclude that key to mini-publics’ quality, when judged against these criteria, is not just their own features, but the degree of ‘co-development’ of all system components.",
    keywords = "Deliberative democracy Mini-publics Deliberative system, Deliberative system, Deliberative democracy, Mini-publics",
    author = "Nicole CURATO and Marit Boker",
    year = "2016",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s11077-015-9238-5",
    language = "English",
    volume = "49",
    pages = "173--190",
    journal = "Policy Sciences",
    issn = "0032-2687",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "2",

    }

    Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system : a research agenda. / CURATO, Nicole; Boker, Marit.

    In: Policy Sciences, Vol. 49, No. 2, 01.06.2016, p. 173-190.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system

    T2 - a research agenda

    AU - CURATO, Nicole

    AU - Boker, Marit

    PY - 2016/6/1

    Y1 - 2016/6/1

    N2 - The systemic turn in deliberative democratic theory has shifted the focus away from seeking to design separate, internally deliberative ‘mini-publics’ and towards a new appreciation of their external, systemic quality. Yet, so far, such accounts have not gone beyond recognising a potential for mini-publics to contribute to deliberative systems. In this paper, we argue that a systemic conceptualisation of mini-publics must recognise their fundamentally ambivalent character: Since mini-publics have the potential both to foster and to undermine systemic deliberation, it is insufficient to celebrate their positive potential alone, and vital to develop frameworks that allow for a critical evaluation of minipublics’ systemic role. To this end, we propose a framework based on the systemic qualities of deliberation-making, legitimacy-seeking and capacity-building, and conclude that key to mini-publics’ quality, when judged against these criteria, is not just their own features, but the degree of ‘co-development’ of all system components.

    AB - The systemic turn in deliberative democratic theory has shifted the focus away from seeking to design separate, internally deliberative ‘mini-publics’ and towards a new appreciation of their external, systemic quality. Yet, so far, such accounts have not gone beyond recognising a potential for mini-publics to contribute to deliberative systems. In this paper, we argue that a systemic conceptualisation of mini-publics must recognise their fundamentally ambivalent character: Since mini-publics have the potential both to foster and to undermine systemic deliberation, it is insufficient to celebrate their positive potential alone, and vital to develop frameworks that allow for a critical evaluation of minipublics’ systemic role. To this end, we propose a framework based on the systemic qualities of deliberation-making, legitimacy-seeking and capacity-building, and conclude that key to mini-publics’ quality, when judged against these criteria, is not just their own features, but the degree of ‘co-development’ of all system components.

    KW - Deliberative democracy Mini-publics Deliberative system

    KW - Deliberative system

    KW - Deliberative democracy

    KW - Mini-publics

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949996053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/linking-minipublics-deliberative-system-research-agenda

    U2 - 10.1007/s11077-015-9238-5

    DO - 10.1007/s11077-015-9238-5

    M3 - Article

    VL - 49

    SP - 173

    EP - 190

    JO - Policy Sciences

    JF - Policy Sciences

    SN - 0032-2687

    IS - 2

    ER -