Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system: a research agenda

Nicole CURATO, Marit Boker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The systemic turn in deliberative democratic theory has shifted the focus away from seeking to design separate, internally deliberative ‘mini-publics’ and towards a new appreciation of their external, systemic quality. Yet, so far, such accounts have not gone beyond recognising a potential for mini-publics to contribute to deliberative systems. In this paper, we argue that a systemic conceptualisation of mini-publics must recognise their fundamentally ambivalent character: Since mini-publics have the potential both to foster and to undermine systemic deliberation, it is insufficient to celebrate their positive potential alone, and vital to develop frameworks that allow for a critical evaluation of minipublics’ systemic role. To this end, we propose a framework based on the systemic qualities of deliberation-making, legitimacy-seeking and capacity-building, and conclude that key to mini-publics’ quality, when judged against these criteria, is not just their own features, but the degree of ‘co-development’ of all system components.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-190
Number of pages18
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system: a research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this