Listening in polarised controversies: a study of listening practices in the public sphere

Carolyn M. Hendriks, Selen A. Ercan, Sonya Duus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)


Listening is an important feature of policy making and democratic politics. Yet in an era of increased polarisation the willingness and capacity of citizens to listen to each other, especially those they disagree with, is under strain. Drawing insights from a divisive community conflict over proposed coal seam gas development in regional Australia, this article examines how citizens listen to each other in a polarised controversy. The analysis identifies four different listening practices that citizens enact in a polarised public sphere, including (1) enclave listening between like-minded citizens; (2) alliance listening across different enclaves; (3) adversarial listening between citizens on opposing sides of the debate to monitor opponents; and (4) transformative listening where citizens listen selectively to other community members with the intention of changing their views. The article argues that all four listening practices fulfil important democratic functions in polarised debates such as enhancing the connective, reflective and communicative capacity of the public sphere. Notwithstanding these democratic contributions, under polarised conditions participatory interventions may be required to enhance the prospects of listening across difference.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-151
Number of pages15
JournalPolicy Sciences
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Listening in polarised controversies: a study of listening practices in the public sphere'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this