Listening in polarised controversies: a study of listening practices in the public sphere

Carolyn M. Hendriks, Selen A. Ercan, Sonya Duus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Listening is an important feature of policy making and democratic politics. Yet in an era of increased polarisation the willingness and capacity of citizens to listen to each other, especially those they disagree with, is under strain. Drawing insights from a divisive community conflict over proposed coal seam gas development in regional Australia, this article examines how citizens listen to each other in a polarised controversy. The analysis identifies four different listening practices that citizens enact in a polarised public sphere, including (1) enclave listening between like-minded citizens; (2) alliance listening across different enclaves; (3) adversarial listening between citizens on opposing sides of the debate to monitor opponents; and (4) transformative listening where citizens listen selectively to other community members with the intention of changing their views. The article argues that all four listening practices fulfil important democratic functions in polarised debates such as enhancing the connective, reflective and communicative capacity of the public sphere. Notwithstanding these democratic contributions, under polarised conditions participatory interventions may be required to enhance the prospects of listening across difference.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-15
Number of pages15
JournalPolicy Sciences
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

citizen
enclave
policy making
coal
coal seam
polarization
community
public
politics
gas

Cite this

Hendriks, Carolyn M. ; Ercan, Selen A. ; Duus, Sonya. / Listening in polarised controversies: a study of listening practices in the public sphere. In: Policy Sciences. 2018 ; pp. 1-15.
@article{fec48a4d03ec4bc7b59762d01ad161b4,
title = "Listening in polarised controversies: a study of listening practices in the public sphere",
abstract = "Listening is an important feature of policy making and democratic politics. Yet in an era of increased polarisation the willingness and capacity of citizens to listen to each other, especially those they disagree with, is under strain. Drawing insights from a divisive community conflict over proposed coal seam gas development in regional Australia, this article examines how citizens listen to each other in a polarised controversy. The analysis identifies four different listening practices that citizens enact in a polarised public sphere, including (1) enclave listening between like-minded citizens; (2) alliance listening across different enclaves; (3) adversarial listening between citizens on opposing sides of the debate to monitor opponents; and (4) transformative listening where citizens listen selectively to other community members with the intention of changing their views. The article argues that all four listening practices fulfil important democratic functions in polarised debates such as enhancing the connective, reflective and communicative capacity of the public sphere. Notwithstanding these democratic contributions, under polarised conditions participatory interventions may be required to enhance the prospects of listening across difference.",
keywords = "Listening, Polarisation, Democratic politics, Community conflict, Citizen engagement, Unconventional gas, Democracy, Energy, Public communication, Political communication",
author = "Hendriks, {Carolyn M.} and Ercan, {Selen A.} and Sonya Duus",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1007/s11077-018-9343-3",
language = "English",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Policy Sciences",
issn = "0032-2687",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Listening in polarised controversies: a study of listening practices in the public sphere. / Hendriks, Carolyn M.; Ercan, Selen A.; Duus, Sonya.

In: Policy Sciences, 13.12.2018, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Listening in polarised controversies: a study of listening practices in the public sphere

AU - Hendriks, Carolyn M.

AU - Ercan, Selen A.

AU - Duus, Sonya

PY - 2018/12/13

Y1 - 2018/12/13

N2 - Listening is an important feature of policy making and democratic politics. Yet in an era of increased polarisation the willingness and capacity of citizens to listen to each other, especially those they disagree with, is under strain. Drawing insights from a divisive community conflict over proposed coal seam gas development in regional Australia, this article examines how citizens listen to each other in a polarised controversy. The analysis identifies four different listening practices that citizens enact in a polarised public sphere, including (1) enclave listening between like-minded citizens; (2) alliance listening across different enclaves; (3) adversarial listening between citizens on opposing sides of the debate to monitor opponents; and (4) transformative listening where citizens listen selectively to other community members with the intention of changing their views. The article argues that all four listening practices fulfil important democratic functions in polarised debates such as enhancing the connective, reflective and communicative capacity of the public sphere. Notwithstanding these democratic contributions, under polarised conditions participatory interventions may be required to enhance the prospects of listening across difference.

AB - Listening is an important feature of policy making and democratic politics. Yet in an era of increased polarisation the willingness and capacity of citizens to listen to each other, especially those they disagree with, is under strain. Drawing insights from a divisive community conflict over proposed coal seam gas development in regional Australia, this article examines how citizens listen to each other in a polarised controversy. The analysis identifies four different listening practices that citizens enact in a polarised public sphere, including (1) enclave listening between like-minded citizens; (2) alliance listening across different enclaves; (3) adversarial listening between citizens on opposing sides of the debate to monitor opponents; and (4) transformative listening where citizens listen selectively to other community members with the intention of changing their views. The article argues that all four listening practices fulfil important democratic functions in polarised debates such as enhancing the connective, reflective and communicative capacity of the public sphere. Notwithstanding these democratic contributions, under polarised conditions participatory interventions may be required to enhance the prospects of listening across difference.

KW - Listening

KW - Polarisation

KW - Democratic politics

KW - Community conflict

KW - Citizen engagement

KW - Unconventional gas

KW - Democracy

KW - Energy

KW - Public communication

KW - Political communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058661658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11077-018-9343-3

DO - 10.1007/s11077-018-9343-3

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Policy Sciences

T2 - Policy Sciences

JF - Policy Sciences

SN - 0032-2687

ER -