Lived experience practitioners and the medical model: world’s colliding?

Louise Byrne, Brenda HAPPELL, Kerry Reid-Searl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Australian mental health policy requires that mental health services facilitate meaningful and genuine consumer participation in all aspects of mental health services. Roles for practitioners who work from their own experience of significant mental health challenges and mental health service use have been implemented in many services to promote participation and the development of more consumer focused services. Aims: To enhance understanding of perspectives of individuals working in lived experience roles to more closely understand their experiences and opinions about these roles. Method: A grounded theory study interviews were conducted with 13 lived experience practitioners. Results: The medical model was a core category arising from this work. Participants described the medical model as a prevailing culture within mental health services from their personal and professional experiences. This culture imposed a major limitation on the implementation, effectiveness and development of lived experience roles and themselves as individuals. It was also seen as a major limitation to the progress of Recovery orientated reform. Conclusions: The development of Recovery oriented services requires a strong lived experience practitioner workforce, with appropriate resourcing and support available. The current medical model approach requires critique to facilitate reform and avoid tokenism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-223
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Mental Health
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Mental Health Services
Mental Health
Health Policy
Interviews

Cite this

Byrne, Louise ; HAPPELL, Brenda ; Reid-Searl, Kerry. / Lived experience practitioners and the medical model: world’s colliding?. In: Journal of Mental Health. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 217-223.
@article{6a4288e62b004a4497aa77040829bb82,
title = "Lived experience practitioners and the medical model: world’s colliding?",
abstract = "Background: Australian mental health policy requires that mental health services facilitate meaningful and genuine consumer participation in all aspects of mental health services. Roles for practitioners who work from their own experience of significant mental health challenges and mental health service use have been implemented in many services to promote participation and the development of more consumer focused services. Aims: To enhance understanding of perspectives of individuals working in lived experience roles to more closely understand their experiences and opinions about these roles. Method: A grounded theory study interviews were conducted with 13 lived experience practitioners. Results: The medical model was a core category arising from this work. Participants described the medical model as a prevailing culture within mental health services from their personal and professional experiences. This culture imposed a major limitation on the implementation, effectiveness and development of lived experience roles and themselves as individuals. It was also seen as a major limitation to the progress of Recovery orientated reform. Conclusions: The development of Recovery oriented services requires a strong lived experience practitioner workforce, with appropriate resourcing and support available. The current medical model approach requires critique to facilitate reform and avoid tokenism.",
keywords = "Consumers, lived experience practitioners, medical model, mental health services, recovery",
author = "Louise Byrne and Brenda HAPPELL and Kerry Reid-Searl",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.3109/09638237.2015.1101428",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "217--223",
journal = "Journal of Mental Health",
issn = "0963-8237",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

Lived experience practitioners and the medical model: world’s colliding? / Byrne, Louise; HAPPELL, Brenda; Reid-Searl, Kerry.

In: Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2016, p. 217-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lived experience practitioners and the medical model: world’s colliding?

AU - Byrne, Louise

AU - HAPPELL, Brenda

AU - Reid-Searl, Kerry

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Australian mental health policy requires that mental health services facilitate meaningful and genuine consumer participation in all aspects of mental health services. Roles for practitioners who work from their own experience of significant mental health challenges and mental health service use have been implemented in many services to promote participation and the development of more consumer focused services. Aims: To enhance understanding of perspectives of individuals working in lived experience roles to more closely understand their experiences and opinions about these roles. Method: A grounded theory study interviews were conducted with 13 lived experience practitioners. Results: The medical model was a core category arising from this work. Participants described the medical model as a prevailing culture within mental health services from their personal and professional experiences. This culture imposed a major limitation on the implementation, effectiveness and development of lived experience roles and themselves as individuals. It was also seen as a major limitation to the progress of Recovery orientated reform. Conclusions: The development of Recovery oriented services requires a strong lived experience practitioner workforce, with appropriate resourcing and support available. The current medical model approach requires critique to facilitate reform and avoid tokenism.

AB - Background: Australian mental health policy requires that mental health services facilitate meaningful and genuine consumer participation in all aspects of mental health services. Roles for practitioners who work from their own experience of significant mental health challenges and mental health service use have been implemented in many services to promote participation and the development of more consumer focused services. Aims: To enhance understanding of perspectives of individuals working in lived experience roles to more closely understand their experiences and opinions about these roles. Method: A grounded theory study interviews were conducted with 13 lived experience practitioners. Results: The medical model was a core category arising from this work. Participants described the medical model as a prevailing culture within mental health services from their personal and professional experiences. This culture imposed a major limitation on the implementation, effectiveness and development of lived experience roles and themselves as individuals. It was also seen as a major limitation to the progress of Recovery orientated reform. Conclusions: The development of Recovery oriented services requires a strong lived experience practitioner workforce, with appropriate resourcing and support available. The current medical model approach requires critique to facilitate reform and avoid tokenism.

KW - Consumers

KW - lived experience practitioners

KW - medical model

KW - mental health services

KW - recovery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949554169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/lived-experience-practitioners-medical-model-worlds-colliding-1

U2 - 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101428

DO - 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101428

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 217

EP - 223

JO - Journal of Mental Health

JF - Journal of Mental Health

SN - 0963-8237

IS - 3

ER -