Localism in Practice: Insights from two Tasmanian case studies

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There is a growing need to develop and implement new forms of governance that respond to the increasing complexity of decision making and balance the roles of government and local citizens. Localism is (re)emerging as an alternative to traditional top-down' governance strategies which are criticised for their failure to adequately respond to the diversity of community needs. This article uses two case studies to explore how localism works in practice, the Tasmanian Drought Support Network and the Tasmanian Forest Agreement. Four dimensions of adaptive governance are used to critically identify the benefits and limitations of localism as a governance approach, exploring the approaches capacity for social and economic entrepreneurship, governance quality and the utilisation and enhancement of individual capacities. These empirical findings will help policy makers and community members better understand localism and guide the development of theory around localism and its future practice
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)592-611
    Number of pages20
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume34
    Issue number5-6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    governance
    theory formation
    drought
    entrepreneurship
    community
    utilization
    citizen
    decision making
    economics

    Cite this

    @article{70ac0d67e8b54fe9af3bff4a40be5287,
    title = "Localism in Practice: Insights from two Tasmanian case studies",
    abstract = "There is a growing need to develop and implement new forms of governance that respond to the increasing complexity of decision making and balance the roles of government and local citizens. Localism is (re)emerging as an alternative to traditional top-down' governance strategies which are criticised for their failure to adequately respond to the diversity of community needs. This article uses two case studies to explore how localism works in practice, the Tasmanian Drought Support Network and the Tasmanian Forest Agreement. Four dimensions of adaptive governance are used to critically identify the benefits and limitations of localism as a governance approach, exploring the approaches capacity for social and economic entrepreneurship, governance quality and the utilisation and enhancement of individual capacities. These empirical findings will help policy makers and community members better understand localism and guide the development of theory around localism and its future practice",
    author = "Melanie Dare",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2013.863572",
    language = "English",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "592--611",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "5-6",

    }

    Localism in Practice: Insights from two Tasmanian case studies. / Dare, Melanie.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 34, No. 5-6, 2013, p. 592-611.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Localism in Practice: Insights from two Tasmanian case studies

    AU - Dare, Melanie

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - There is a growing need to develop and implement new forms of governance that respond to the increasing complexity of decision making and balance the roles of government and local citizens. Localism is (re)emerging as an alternative to traditional top-down' governance strategies which are criticised for their failure to adequately respond to the diversity of community needs. This article uses two case studies to explore how localism works in practice, the Tasmanian Drought Support Network and the Tasmanian Forest Agreement. Four dimensions of adaptive governance are used to critically identify the benefits and limitations of localism as a governance approach, exploring the approaches capacity for social and economic entrepreneurship, governance quality and the utilisation and enhancement of individual capacities. These empirical findings will help policy makers and community members better understand localism and guide the development of theory around localism and its future practice

    AB - There is a growing need to develop and implement new forms of governance that respond to the increasing complexity of decision making and balance the roles of government and local citizens. Localism is (re)emerging as an alternative to traditional top-down' governance strategies which are criticised for their failure to adequately respond to the diversity of community needs. This article uses two case studies to explore how localism works in practice, the Tasmanian Drought Support Network and the Tasmanian Forest Agreement. Four dimensions of adaptive governance are used to critically identify the benefits and limitations of localism as a governance approach, exploring the approaches capacity for social and economic entrepreneurship, governance quality and the utilisation and enhancement of individual capacities. These empirical findings will help policy makers and community members better understand localism and guide the development of theory around localism and its future practice

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2013.863572

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2013.863572

    M3 - Article

    VL - 34

    SP - 592

    EP - 611

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 5-6

    ER -