Looking beneath the surface: using hydrogeology and traits to explain flow variability effects on stream macroinvertebrate

Jarrod KATH, Evan HARRISON, Ben KEFFORD, Leah MOORE, Paul Wood, Ralf Schafer, Fiona DYER

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Flow variability drives important instream ecohydrological processes. Nonetheless, generalizations about ecological responses to flow variability are elusive and complicated by interacting factors. Hydrogeological controls on groundwater inputs into streams are often an overlooked factor that may interact with flow variability and influence instream ecology. Flow effects on ecology are also complicated by flora and fauna trait diversity, which makes some organisms more sensitive to flow variability than others. To improve understanding regarding the effects of flow variability on instream communities, we utilized a long-term 17-year data set of macroinvertebrate communities from eight sites on the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment, south eastern Australia. Hydrogeological mapping provided a proxy of groundwater influence on instream ecology. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test hydrogeology (i.e. groundwater influence) and flow variability effects on selected taxa and trait groups. Trait groups tested were those with drought-resistant life stages, no drought-resistant life stages and those with poor dispersal traits. Non-drought resistant and poor dispersing taxa responded to hydrogeology and stream flow variables, while taxa with drought-resistant traits did not. Poor dispersing taxa displayed the strongest positive response to interactions between high mean flow and hydrogeological conditions that facilitate groundwater inputs. While the importance of flow variability is widely recognized, the combined role of hydrogeology and trait groups on macroinvertebrate responses has not been widely considered thus far. This study demonstrates that the consideration of hydrogeology and faunal traits can help improve the understanding of macroinvertebrate population and community responses to flow regime variability
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1480-1495
    Number of pages16
    JournalEcohydrology
    Volume9
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    hydrogeology
    macroinvertebrates
    macroinvertebrate
    groundwater
    drought
    ecology
    effect
    community response
    stream flow
    streamflow
    flora
    fauna
    catchment

    Cite this

    KATH, Jarrod ; HARRISON, Evan ; KEFFORD, Ben ; MOORE, Leah ; Wood, Paul ; Schafer, Ralf ; DYER, Fiona. / Looking beneath the surface: using hydrogeology and traits to explain flow variability effects on stream macroinvertebrate. In: Ecohydrology. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 8. pp. 1480-1495.
    @article{3cd4dc8ea3cc4f4aa98d42117ede18db,
    title = "Looking beneath the surface: using hydrogeology and traits to explain flow variability effects on stream macroinvertebrate",
    abstract = "Flow variability drives important instream ecohydrological processes. Nonetheless, generalizations about ecological responses to flow variability are elusive and complicated by interacting factors. Hydrogeological controls on groundwater inputs into streams are often an overlooked factor that may interact with flow variability and influence instream ecology. Flow effects on ecology are also complicated by flora and fauna trait diversity, which makes some organisms more sensitive to flow variability than others. To improve understanding regarding the effects of flow variability on instream communities, we utilized a long-term 17-year data set of macroinvertebrate communities from eight sites on the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment, south eastern Australia. Hydrogeological mapping provided a proxy of groundwater influence on instream ecology. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test hydrogeology (i.e. groundwater influence) and flow variability effects on selected taxa and trait groups. Trait groups tested were those with drought-resistant life stages, no drought-resistant life stages and those with poor dispersal traits. Non-drought resistant and poor dispersing taxa responded to hydrogeology and stream flow variables, while taxa with drought-resistant traits did not. Poor dispersing taxa displayed the strongest positive response to interactions between high mean flow and hydrogeological conditions that facilitate groundwater inputs. While the importance of flow variability is widely recognized, the combined role of hydrogeology and trait groups on macroinvertebrate responses has not been widely considered thus far. This study demonstrates that the consideration of hydrogeology and faunal traits can help improve the understanding of macroinvertebrate population and community responses to flow regime variability",
    author = "Jarrod KATH and Evan HARRISON and Ben KEFFORD and Leah MOORE and Paul Wood and Ralf Schafer and Fiona DYER",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1002/eco.1741",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "1480--1495",
    journal = "Ecohydrology",
    issn = "1936-0584",
    publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
    number = "8",

    }

    Looking beneath the surface: using hydrogeology and traits to explain flow variability effects on stream macroinvertebrate. / KATH, Jarrod; HARRISON, Evan; KEFFORD, Ben; MOORE, Leah; Wood, Paul; Schafer, Ralf; DYER, Fiona.

    In: Ecohydrology, Vol. 9, No. 8, 2016, p. 1480-1495.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Looking beneath the surface: using hydrogeology and traits to explain flow variability effects on stream macroinvertebrate

    AU - KATH, Jarrod

    AU - HARRISON, Evan

    AU - KEFFORD, Ben

    AU - MOORE, Leah

    AU - Wood, Paul

    AU - Schafer, Ralf

    AU - DYER, Fiona

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Flow variability drives important instream ecohydrological processes. Nonetheless, generalizations about ecological responses to flow variability are elusive and complicated by interacting factors. Hydrogeological controls on groundwater inputs into streams are often an overlooked factor that may interact with flow variability and influence instream ecology. Flow effects on ecology are also complicated by flora and fauna trait diversity, which makes some organisms more sensitive to flow variability than others. To improve understanding regarding the effects of flow variability on instream communities, we utilized a long-term 17-year data set of macroinvertebrate communities from eight sites on the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment, south eastern Australia. Hydrogeological mapping provided a proxy of groundwater influence on instream ecology. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test hydrogeology (i.e. groundwater influence) and flow variability effects on selected taxa and trait groups. Trait groups tested were those with drought-resistant life stages, no drought-resistant life stages and those with poor dispersal traits. Non-drought resistant and poor dispersing taxa responded to hydrogeology and stream flow variables, while taxa with drought-resistant traits did not. Poor dispersing taxa displayed the strongest positive response to interactions between high mean flow and hydrogeological conditions that facilitate groundwater inputs. While the importance of flow variability is widely recognized, the combined role of hydrogeology and trait groups on macroinvertebrate responses has not been widely considered thus far. This study demonstrates that the consideration of hydrogeology and faunal traits can help improve the understanding of macroinvertebrate population and community responses to flow regime variability

    AB - Flow variability drives important instream ecohydrological processes. Nonetheless, generalizations about ecological responses to flow variability are elusive and complicated by interacting factors. Hydrogeological controls on groundwater inputs into streams are often an overlooked factor that may interact with flow variability and influence instream ecology. Flow effects on ecology are also complicated by flora and fauna trait diversity, which makes some organisms more sensitive to flow variability than others. To improve understanding regarding the effects of flow variability on instream communities, we utilized a long-term 17-year data set of macroinvertebrate communities from eight sites on the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment, south eastern Australia. Hydrogeological mapping provided a proxy of groundwater influence on instream ecology. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test hydrogeology (i.e. groundwater influence) and flow variability effects on selected taxa and trait groups. Trait groups tested were those with drought-resistant life stages, no drought-resistant life stages and those with poor dispersal traits. Non-drought resistant and poor dispersing taxa responded to hydrogeology and stream flow variables, while taxa with drought-resistant traits did not. Poor dispersing taxa displayed the strongest positive response to interactions between high mean flow and hydrogeological conditions that facilitate groundwater inputs. While the importance of flow variability is widely recognized, the combined role of hydrogeology and trait groups on macroinvertebrate responses has not been widely considered thus far. This study demonstrates that the consideration of hydrogeology and faunal traits can help improve the understanding of macroinvertebrate population and community responses to flow regime variability

    U2 - 10.1002/eco.1741

    DO - 10.1002/eco.1741

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 1480

    EP - 1495

    JO - Ecohydrology

    JF - Ecohydrology

    SN - 1936-0584

    IS - 8

    ER -