Losing the authority

What institutional architecture for cooperative governance in the Murray Darling Basin?

Jason Alexandra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Water governance strongly depends on the institutional arrangements in place. The plethora of recent inquiries into the adequacy and integrity of governance arrangements in the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) indicates a crisis of trust, legitimacy and public confidence–in short, a loss of authority. With the prospect that current arrangements are losing the authority and legitimacy needed to govern the Basin, pressure is mounting for further reforms due to scandals exposed in the media throughout 2017 and 2018. These and subsequent inquiries have revealed serious concerns about probity, integrity, maladministration and the adequacy of compliance and enforcement regimes. The productive potential of this crisis is that draws attention to the need for reforms to governance institutions. This paper aims to explore the redesign of the institutional architecture in the MDB. Given the profound challenges of social and climate change that are demanding reconsideration of the underlying models used in adaptively governing large complex socio-ecological systems, the paper asks what arrangements are suited to the challenges of governing the Basin in the 21 st century? This paper explores the nature of the redesign challenge, exploring principles, practices and features of MDB governance. The need for institutions with capacity for strategic navigation, goal seeking and the cultural co-construction of authority are suggested in the interests of cultivating debate about prospective reorganisation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalAustralian Journal of Water Resources
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

basin
social change
navigation
compliance
climate change
water
need
loss
public
enforcement

Cite this

@article{858e6e8da3df4b3babaff5eabd775efa,
title = "Losing the authority: What institutional architecture for cooperative governance in the Murray Darling Basin?",
abstract = "Water governance strongly depends on the institutional arrangements in place. The plethora of recent inquiries into the adequacy and integrity of governance arrangements in the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) indicates a crisis of trust, legitimacy and public confidence–in short, a loss of authority. With the prospect that current arrangements are losing the authority and legitimacy needed to govern the Basin, pressure is mounting for further reforms due to scandals exposed in the media throughout 2017 and 2018. These and subsequent inquiries have revealed serious concerns about probity, integrity, maladministration and the adequacy of compliance and enforcement regimes. The productive potential of this crisis is that draws attention to the need for reforms to governance institutions. This paper aims to explore the redesign of the institutional architecture in the MDB. Given the profound challenges of social and climate change that are demanding reconsideration of the underlying models used in adaptively governing large complex socio-ecological systems, the paper asks what arrangements are suited to the challenges of governing the Basin in the 21 st century? This paper explores the nature of the redesign challenge, exploring principles, practices and features of MDB governance. The need for institutions with capacity for strategic navigation, goal seeking and the cultural co-construction of authority are suggested in the interests of cultivating debate about prospective reorganisation.",
keywords = "co-production of authority, institutional architecture, Institutional arrangements, legitimacy, Murray Darling Basin, water governance",
author = "Jason Alexandra",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/13241583.2019.1586066",
language = "English",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Australian Journal of Water Resources",
issn = "1324-1583",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

Losing the authority : What institutional architecture for cooperative governance in the Murray Darling Basin? / Alexandra, Jason.

In: Australian Journal of Water Resources, 12.03.2019, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Losing the authority

T2 - What institutional architecture for cooperative governance in the Murray Darling Basin?

AU - Alexandra, Jason

PY - 2019/3/12

Y1 - 2019/3/12

N2 - Water governance strongly depends on the institutional arrangements in place. The plethora of recent inquiries into the adequacy and integrity of governance arrangements in the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) indicates a crisis of trust, legitimacy and public confidence–in short, a loss of authority. With the prospect that current arrangements are losing the authority and legitimacy needed to govern the Basin, pressure is mounting for further reforms due to scandals exposed in the media throughout 2017 and 2018. These and subsequent inquiries have revealed serious concerns about probity, integrity, maladministration and the adequacy of compliance and enforcement regimes. The productive potential of this crisis is that draws attention to the need for reforms to governance institutions. This paper aims to explore the redesign of the institutional architecture in the MDB. Given the profound challenges of social and climate change that are demanding reconsideration of the underlying models used in adaptively governing large complex socio-ecological systems, the paper asks what arrangements are suited to the challenges of governing the Basin in the 21 st century? This paper explores the nature of the redesign challenge, exploring principles, practices and features of MDB governance. The need for institutions with capacity for strategic navigation, goal seeking and the cultural co-construction of authority are suggested in the interests of cultivating debate about prospective reorganisation.

AB - Water governance strongly depends on the institutional arrangements in place. The plethora of recent inquiries into the adequacy and integrity of governance arrangements in the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) indicates a crisis of trust, legitimacy and public confidence–in short, a loss of authority. With the prospect that current arrangements are losing the authority and legitimacy needed to govern the Basin, pressure is mounting for further reforms due to scandals exposed in the media throughout 2017 and 2018. These and subsequent inquiries have revealed serious concerns about probity, integrity, maladministration and the adequacy of compliance and enforcement regimes. The productive potential of this crisis is that draws attention to the need for reforms to governance institutions. This paper aims to explore the redesign of the institutional architecture in the MDB. Given the profound challenges of social and climate change that are demanding reconsideration of the underlying models used in adaptively governing large complex socio-ecological systems, the paper asks what arrangements are suited to the challenges of governing the Basin in the 21 st century? This paper explores the nature of the redesign challenge, exploring principles, practices and features of MDB governance. The need for institutions with capacity for strategic navigation, goal seeking and the cultural co-construction of authority are suggested in the interests of cultivating debate about prospective reorganisation.

KW - co-production of authority

KW - institutional architecture

KW - Institutional arrangements

KW - legitimacy

KW - Murray Darling Basin

KW - water governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062768162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/losing-authoritywhat-institutional-architecture-cooperative-governance-murray-darling-basin

U2 - 10.1080/13241583.2019.1586066

DO - 10.1080/13241583.2019.1586066

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Australian Journal of Water Resources

JF - Australian Journal of Water Resources

SN - 1324-1583

ER -