TY - JOUR
T1 - Making sense of civic enterprise
T2 - Social innovation, participatory democracy and the administrative state
AU - Wagenaar, Hendrik
N1 - Funding Information:
wages. The program is managed by a cartel of large private insurance companies that also manage health care.?Regional?“Zorgkantoren”?(a?kind?of?financial?clearing?houses?for?care)?distribute?the?care?budget?to? care facilities and corporations and account for its adequate spending. The Wmo is meant for lighter forms of?care?and?support?that?is?provided?in?people’s?homes.?Its?goal?is?to?maintain?the?capacity?for?independent? living and maximum social participation for people with physical, social or mental constraints and thereby prevent, costly, institutionalization. The program is administered by municipalities and financed through a block grant from the national government. Municipalities can spend the money as they see fit. Many have contracted corporate, for-profit providers, but they can also enter into a contract with a CE, or facilitate volunteering. In this paper I discuss that part of social care that is regulated and financed by the Wmo and administered by municipalities.
Funding Information:
The literature on social enterprise presents a confusing array of definitions and characterizations which often reflect the preferences or geographical origins of the author. In the US the emphasis is usually on the earnings-side of social enterprise. Social enterprise is an offshoot of the nonprofit sector, with innovation in the service of competing for funding from philanthropic foundations (Defourny and Nyssens 2013, 41; Nicholls 2010, 83). A second conception of social enterprise focuses on the individual entrepreneur who uses innovative technology and financial models to deliver goods or services to address the needs of communities. A third model situates social enterprise in the Third Sector. Public austerity, the privatization of public services and the diffusion of a managerialist ideology in ever more domains of society, resulted in a favorable climate for innovative entrepreneurial approaches to providing public services. A Europe-wide study of social enterprise (EMES) observes the classic Schumpeterian features of economic development – new products, new methods of organization and production, and new production factors – in the provision of work integration programs and personal services (Defourny and Nyssens 2013, 43; http://emes.net).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019-University of Salento.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Civic enterprises (CEs)-groups of citizens, often organized as cooperatives, who produce social goods in a democratic way, responsive to local and individual needs-are a rapidly proliferating phenomenon in Europe, in fields as diverse as sustainable energy, social care and urban regeneration. Yet, we know relatively little about them. Using research on social care CEs in the Netherlands, I discuss them respectively as instances of the social economy, social enterprises and as a form of participatory democracy. CEs operate in a dense administrative environment. I show how CEs experience serious constraints from the laws, procedures, operating procedures and financial regimes of state organizations and business corporations that erode their democratic nature. I conclude that CEs suffer from a democratic paradox: although they demonstrate considerable innovative potential, this goes unacknowledged by dominant economic-political institutions.
AB - Civic enterprises (CEs)-groups of citizens, often organized as cooperatives, who produce social goods in a democratic way, responsive to local and individual needs-are a rapidly proliferating phenomenon in Europe, in fields as diverse as sustainable energy, social care and urban regeneration. Yet, we know relatively little about them. Using research on social care CEs in the Netherlands, I discuss them respectively as instances of the social economy, social enterprises and as a form of participatory democracy. CEs operate in a dense administrative environment. I show how CEs experience serious constraints from the laws, procedures, operating procedures and financial regimes of state organizations and business corporations that erode their democratic nature. I conclude that CEs suffer from a democratic paradox: although they demonstrate considerable innovative potential, this goes unacknowledged by dominant economic-political institutions.
KW - Cooperations
KW - Participatory democracy
KW - Social care
KW - Social economy
KW - Social enterprise
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081648872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1285/i20356609v12i2p297
DO - 10.1285/i20356609v12i2p297
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081648872
SN - 1972-7623
VL - 12
SP - 297
EP - 324
JO - Partecipazione e Conflitto
JF - Partecipazione e Conflitto
IS - 2
ER -