Mass-gathering health research foundational theory

Part 2-event modeling for mass gatherings

Sheila Turris, Adam Lund, Alison Hutton, Ron Bowles, Elizabeth Ellerson, Malinda Steenkamp, Jamie RANSE, Paul Arbon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Current knowledge about mass-gathering health (MGH) fails to adequately inform the understanding of mass gatherings (MGs) because of a relative lack of theory development and adequate conceptual analysis. This report describes the development of a series of event lenses that serve as a beginning MG event model, complimenting the MG population model reported elsewhere. Methods Existing descriptions of MGs were considered. Analyzing gaps in current knowledge, the authors sought to delineate the population of events being reported. Employing a consensus approach, the authors strove to capture the diversity, range, and scope of MG events, identifying common variables that might assist researchers in determining when events are similar and might be compared. Through face-to-face group meetings, structured breakout sessions, asynchronous collaboration, and virtual international meetings, a conceptual approach to classifying and describing events evolved in an iterative fashion. Findings Embedded within existing literature are a variety of approaches to event classification and description. Arising from these approaches, the authors discuss the interplay between event demographics, event dynamics, and event design. Specifically, the report details current understandings about event types, geography, scale, temporality, crowd dynamics, medical support, protective factors, and special hazards. A series of tables are presented to model the different analytic lenses that might be employed in understanding the context of MG events. Interpretation The development of an event model addresses a gap in the current body of knowledge vis a vis understanding and reporting the full scope of the health effects related to MGs. Consistent use of a consensus-based event model will support more rigorous data collection. This in turn will support meta-analysis, create a foundation for risk assessment, allow for the pooling of data for illness and injury prediction, and support methodology for evaluating health promotion, harm reduction, and clinical response interventions at MGs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)655-663
Number of pages9
JournalPrehospital and Disaster Medicine
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2014

Fingerprint

Lenses
Meta-Analysis
Consensus
Harm Reduction
Geography
Group Processes
Health
Health Promotion
Research
Population
Research Personnel
Demography
Wounds and Injuries
Protective Factors

Cite this

Turris, S., Lund, A., Hutton, A., Bowles, R., Ellerson, E., Steenkamp, M., ... Arbon, P. (2014). Mass-gathering health research foundational theory: Part 2-event modeling for mass gatherings. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 29(6), 655-663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X14001228
Turris, Sheila ; Lund, Adam ; Hutton, Alison ; Bowles, Ron ; Ellerson, Elizabeth ; Steenkamp, Malinda ; RANSE, Jamie ; Arbon, Paul. / Mass-gathering health research foundational theory : Part 2-event modeling for mass gatherings. In: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 655-663.
@article{736cb6f64a10405baa2079641090cc7d,
title = "Mass-gathering health research foundational theory: Part 2-event modeling for mass gatherings",
abstract = "Background Current knowledge about mass-gathering health (MGH) fails to adequately inform the understanding of mass gatherings (MGs) because of a relative lack of theory development and adequate conceptual analysis. This report describes the development of a series of event lenses that serve as a beginning MG event model, complimenting the MG population model reported elsewhere. Methods Existing descriptions of MGs were considered. Analyzing gaps in current knowledge, the authors sought to delineate the population of events being reported. Employing a consensus approach, the authors strove to capture the diversity, range, and scope of MG events, identifying common variables that might assist researchers in determining when events are similar and might be compared. Through face-to-face group meetings, structured breakout sessions, asynchronous collaboration, and virtual international meetings, a conceptual approach to classifying and describing events evolved in an iterative fashion. Findings Embedded within existing literature are a variety of approaches to event classification and description. Arising from these approaches, the authors discuss the interplay between event demographics, event dynamics, and event design. Specifically, the report details current understandings about event types, geography, scale, temporality, crowd dynamics, medical support, protective factors, and special hazards. A series of tables are presented to model the different analytic lenses that might be employed in understanding the context of MG events. Interpretation The development of an event model addresses a gap in the current body of knowledge vis a vis understanding and reporting the full scope of the health effects related to MGs. Consistent use of a consensus-based event model will support more rigorous data collection. This in turn will support meta-analysis, create a foundation for risk assessment, allow for the pooling of data for illness and injury prediction, and support methodology for evaluating health promotion, harm reduction, and clinical response interventions at MGs.",
keywords = "mass gatherings, mass-gathering, health, minimum data set, population, theoretical modeling, mass-gathering health, Models, Theoretical, Humans, Data Collection/standards, Health Services Research, Crowding, Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration, Mass Behavior, Health Planning",
author = "Sheila Turris and Adam Lund and Alison Hutton and Ron Bowles and Elizabeth Ellerson and Malinda Steenkamp and Jamie RANSE and Paul Arbon",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1017/S1049023X14001228",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "655--663",
journal = "Prehospital and Disaster Medicine",
issn = "1049-023X",
publisher = "World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine",
number = "6",

}

Turris, S, Lund, A, Hutton, A, Bowles, R, Ellerson, E, Steenkamp, M, RANSE, J & Arbon, P 2014, 'Mass-gathering health research foundational theory: Part 2-event modeling for mass gatherings', Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 655-663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X14001228

Mass-gathering health research foundational theory : Part 2-event modeling for mass gatherings. / Turris, Sheila; Lund, Adam; Hutton, Alison; Bowles, Ron; Ellerson, Elizabeth; Steenkamp, Malinda; RANSE, Jamie; Arbon, Paul.

In: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 6, 17.11.2014, p. 655-663.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mass-gathering health research foundational theory

T2 - Part 2-event modeling for mass gatherings

AU - Turris, Sheila

AU - Lund, Adam

AU - Hutton, Alison

AU - Bowles, Ron

AU - Ellerson, Elizabeth

AU - Steenkamp, Malinda

AU - RANSE, Jamie

AU - Arbon, Paul

PY - 2014/11/17

Y1 - 2014/11/17

N2 - Background Current knowledge about mass-gathering health (MGH) fails to adequately inform the understanding of mass gatherings (MGs) because of a relative lack of theory development and adequate conceptual analysis. This report describes the development of a series of event lenses that serve as a beginning MG event model, complimenting the MG population model reported elsewhere. Methods Existing descriptions of MGs were considered. Analyzing gaps in current knowledge, the authors sought to delineate the population of events being reported. Employing a consensus approach, the authors strove to capture the diversity, range, and scope of MG events, identifying common variables that might assist researchers in determining when events are similar and might be compared. Through face-to-face group meetings, structured breakout sessions, asynchronous collaboration, and virtual international meetings, a conceptual approach to classifying and describing events evolved in an iterative fashion. Findings Embedded within existing literature are a variety of approaches to event classification and description. Arising from these approaches, the authors discuss the interplay between event demographics, event dynamics, and event design. Specifically, the report details current understandings about event types, geography, scale, temporality, crowd dynamics, medical support, protective factors, and special hazards. A series of tables are presented to model the different analytic lenses that might be employed in understanding the context of MG events. Interpretation The development of an event model addresses a gap in the current body of knowledge vis a vis understanding and reporting the full scope of the health effects related to MGs. Consistent use of a consensus-based event model will support more rigorous data collection. This in turn will support meta-analysis, create a foundation for risk assessment, allow for the pooling of data for illness and injury prediction, and support methodology for evaluating health promotion, harm reduction, and clinical response interventions at MGs.

AB - Background Current knowledge about mass-gathering health (MGH) fails to adequately inform the understanding of mass gatherings (MGs) because of a relative lack of theory development and adequate conceptual analysis. This report describes the development of a series of event lenses that serve as a beginning MG event model, complimenting the MG population model reported elsewhere. Methods Existing descriptions of MGs were considered. Analyzing gaps in current knowledge, the authors sought to delineate the population of events being reported. Employing a consensus approach, the authors strove to capture the diversity, range, and scope of MG events, identifying common variables that might assist researchers in determining when events are similar and might be compared. Through face-to-face group meetings, structured breakout sessions, asynchronous collaboration, and virtual international meetings, a conceptual approach to classifying and describing events evolved in an iterative fashion. Findings Embedded within existing literature are a variety of approaches to event classification and description. Arising from these approaches, the authors discuss the interplay between event demographics, event dynamics, and event design. Specifically, the report details current understandings about event types, geography, scale, temporality, crowd dynamics, medical support, protective factors, and special hazards. A series of tables are presented to model the different analytic lenses that might be employed in understanding the context of MG events. Interpretation The development of an event model addresses a gap in the current body of knowledge vis a vis understanding and reporting the full scope of the health effects related to MGs. Consistent use of a consensus-based event model will support more rigorous data collection. This in turn will support meta-analysis, create a foundation for risk assessment, allow for the pooling of data for illness and injury prediction, and support methodology for evaluating health promotion, harm reduction, and clinical response interventions at MGs.

KW - mass gatherings

KW - mass-gathering

KW - health

KW - minimum data set

KW - population

KW - theoretical modeling

KW - mass-gathering health

KW - Models, Theoretical

KW - Humans

KW - Data Collection/standards

KW - Health Services Research

KW - Crowding

KW - Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration

KW - Mass Behavior

KW - Health Planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925548027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/massgathering-health-research-foundational-theory-part-2event-modeling-mass-gatherings

U2 - 10.1017/S1049023X14001228

DO - 10.1017/S1049023X14001228

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 655

EP - 663

JO - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

JF - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

SN - 1049-023X

IS - 6

ER -