TY - JOUR
T1 - Mass-gathering health research foundational theory
T2 - Part 2-event modeling for mass gatherings
AU - Turris, Sheila
AU - Lund, Adam
AU - Hutton, Alison
AU - Bowles, Ron
AU - Ellerson, Elizabeth
AU - Steenkamp, Malinda
AU - RANSE, Jamie
AU - Arbon, Paul
PY - 2014/11/17
Y1 - 2014/11/17
N2 - Background Current knowledge about mass-gathering health (MGH) fails to adequately inform the understanding of mass gatherings (MGs) because of a relative lack of theory development and adequate conceptual analysis. This report describes the development of a series of event lenses that serve as a beginning MG event model, complimenting the MG population model reported elsewhere. Methods Existing descriptions of MGs were considered. Analyzing gaps in current knowledge, the authors sought to delineate the population of events being reported. Employing a consensus approach, the authors strove to capture the diversity, range, and scope of MG events, identifying common variables that might assist researchers in determining when events are similar and might be compared. Through face-to-face group meetings, structured breakout sessions, asynchronous collaboration, and virtual international meetings, a conceptual approach to classifying and describing events evolved in an iterative fashion. Findings Embedded within existing literature are a variety of approaches to event classification and description. Arising from these approaches, the authors discuss the interplay between event demographics, event dynamics, and event design. Specifically, the report details current understandings about event types, geography, scale, temporality, crowd dynamics, medical support, protective factors, and special hazards. A series of tables are presented to model the different analytic lenses that might be employed in understanding the context of MG events. Interpretation The development of an event model addresses a gap in the current body of knowledge vis a vis understanding and reporting the full scope of the health effects related to MGs. Consistent use of a consensus-based event model will support more rigorous data collection. This in turn will support meta-analysis, create a foundation for risk assessment, allow for the pooling of data for illness and injury prediction, and support methodology for evaluating health promotion, harm reduction, and clinical response interventions at MGs.
AB - Background Current knowledge about mass-gathering health (MGH) fails to adequately inform the understanding of mass gatherings (MGs) because of a relative lack of theory development and adequate conceptual analysis. This report describes the development of a series of event lenses that serve as a beginning MG event model, complimenting the MG population model reported elsewhere. Methods Existing descriptions of MGs were considered. Analyzing gaps in current knowledge, the authors sought to delineate the population of events being reported. Employing a consensus approach, the authors strove to capture the diversity, range, and scope of MG events, identifying common variables that might assist researchers in determining when events are similar and might be compared. Through face-to-face group meetings, structured breakout sessions, asynchronous collaboration, and virtual international meetings, a conceptual approach to classifying and describing events evolved in an iterative fashion. Findings Embedded within existing literature are a variety of approaches to event classification and description. Arising from these approaches, the authors discuss the interplay between event demographics, event dynamics, and event design. Specifically, the report details current understandings about event types, geography, scale, temporality, crowd dynamics, medical support, protective factors, and special hazards. A series of tables are presented to model the different analytic lenses that might be employed in understanding the context of MG events. Interpretation The development of an event model addresses a gap in the current body of knowledge vis a vis understanding and reporting the full scope of the health effects related to MGs. Consistent use of a consensus-based event model will support more rigorous data collection. This in turn will support meta-analysis, create a foundation for risk assessment, allow for the pooling of data for illness and injury prediction, and support methodology for evaluating health promotion, harm reduction, and clinical response interventions at MGs.
KW - mass gatherings
KW - mass-gathering
KW - health
KW - minimum data set
KW - population
KW - theoretical modeling
KW - mass-gathering health
KW - Models, Theoretical
KW - Humans
KW - Data Collection/standards
KW - Health Services Research
KW - Crowding
KW - Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration
KW - Mass Behavior
KW - Health Planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925548027&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/massgathering-health-research-foundational-theory-part-2event-modeling-mass-gatherings
U2 - 10.1017/S1049023X14001228
DO - 10.1017/S1049023X14001228
M3 - Article
C2 - 25399520
SN - 1049-023X
VL - 29
SP - 655
EP - 663
JO - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
JF - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
IS - 6
ER -