Measuring competitive impact

Joint-species modelling of invaded plant communities

Andrew O'Reilly Nugent, Elizabeth M. Wandrag, Jane A. Catford, Bernd Gruber, Don Driscoll, Richard P. Duncan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Non-native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non-native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts. Joint-species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance. We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy-woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non-native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non-native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non-native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non-native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter-statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing. Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint-species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non-native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Ecology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

plant community
plant communities
modeling
Bromus diandrus
biogeography
Avena fatua
grazing
ground cover plants
indigenous species
fertility
Oxalis
measuring
Macropodidae
biomass
native species
woodlands
competitive displacement
grasses
synthesis
targeting

Cite this

O'Reilly Nugent, Andrew ; Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Catford, Jane A. ; Gruber, Bernd ; Driscoll, Don ; Duncan, Richard P. / Measuring competitive impact : Joint-species modelling of invaded plant communities. In: Journal of Ecology. 2019 ; pp. 1-11.
@article{fd010939bb0147faba3360cb74230961,
title = "Measuring competitive impact: Joint-species modelling of invaded plant communities",
abstract = "Non-native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non-native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts. Joint-species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance. We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy-woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non-native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non-native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non-native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non-native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter-statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing. Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint-species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non-native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.",
keywords = "grasslands, grazing, impact, invasive species, joint-species distribution model (JSDM), light competition, nutrient addition, tobit regression",
author = "{O'Reilly Nugent}, Andrew and Wandrag, {Elizabeth M.} and Catford, {Jane A.} and Bernd Gruber and Don Driscoll and Duncan, {Richard P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2745.13280",
language = "English",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Journal of Ecology",
issn = "0022-0477",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Measuring competitive impact : Joint-species modelling of invaded plant communities. / O'Reilly Nugent, Andrew; Wandrag, Elizabeth M.; Catford, Jane A.; Gruber, Bernd; Driscoll, Don; Duncan, Richard P.

In: Journal of Ecology, 11.09.2019, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring competitive impact

T2 - Joint-species modelling of invaded plant communities

AU - O'Reilly Nugent, Andrew

AU - Wandrag, Elizabeth M.

AU - Catford, Jane A.

AU - Gruber, Bernd

AU - Driscoll, Don

AU - Duncan, Richard P.

PY - 2019/9/11

Y1 - 2019/9/11

N2 - Non-native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non-native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts. Joint-species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance. We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy-woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non-native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non-native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non-native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non-native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter-statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing. Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint-species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non-native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.

AB - Non-native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non-native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts. Joint-species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance. We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy-woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non-native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non-native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non-native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non-native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter-statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing. Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint-species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non-native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.

KW - grasslands

KW - grazing

KW - impact

KW - invasive species

KW - joint-species distribution model (JSDM)

KW - light competition

KW - nutrient addition

KW - tobit regression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073950534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2745.13280

DO - 10.1111/1365-2745.13280

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Ecology

JF - Journal of Ecology

SN - 0022-0477

ER -