Measuring research 'impact' for academic promotion

Issues from the literature

Kylie M. Smith, Ellie Crookes, Patrick A. Crookes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Around the world, governments and the higher education sector are being asked to become more accountable for the money they spend on research funding. Research quality measurement exercises, such as the Excellence in Research for Australia initiative, use a number of agreed indicators to measure, analyse and report on various institution and discipline-based research outputs. This emphasis on the outputs of research as opposed to its longer term outcomes is having an effect on internal university policy and processes which can often operate negatively on individual staff career development and promotion. This article reports on a project aimed at more clearly articulating and defining the idea of research impact for academics by preparing a promotion application. Phase one of the project was an extensive international literature review and this article sets out the findings from this review, considers the difficulties for articulating and evidences impact at the individual level and makes some suggestions for how academic staff and units might begin to deal with the idea of research impact.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-420
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

impact research
promotion
university policy
staff
money
funding
career
literature
evidence
education

Cite this

@article{3d48280c86324039b69a1af01ebde07f,
title = "Measuring research 'impact' for academic promotion: Issues from the literature",
abstract = "Around the world, governments and the higher education sector are being asked to become more accountable for the money they spend on research funding. Research quality measurement exercises, such as the Excellence in Research for Australia initiative, use a number of agreed indicators to measure, analyse and report on various institution and discipline-based research outputs. This emphasis on the outputs of research as opposed to its longer term outcomes is having an effect on internal university policy and processes which can often operate negatively on individual staff career development and promotion. This article reports on a project aimed at more clearly articulating and defining the idea of research impact for academics by preparing a promotion application. Phase one of the project was an extensive international literature review and this article sets out the findings from this review, considers the difficulties for articulating and evidences impact at the individual level and makes some suggestions for how academic staff and units might begin to deal with the idea of research impact.",
keywords = "bibliometrics, ERA, Excellence in Research for Australia, impact, research quality",
author = "Smith, {Kylie M.} and Ellie Crookes and Crookes, {Patrick A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1360080X.2013.812173",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "410--420",
journal = "Journal of Tertiary Education Administration",
issn = "1360-080X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Measuring research 'impact' for academic promotion : Issues from the literature. / Smith, Kylie M.; Crookes, Ellie; Crookes, Patrick A.

In: Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.08.2013, p. 410-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring research 'impact' for academic promotion

T2 - Issues from the literature

AU - Smith, Kylie M.

AU - Crookes, Ellie

AU - Crookes, Patrick A.

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Around the world, governments and the higher education sector are being asked to become more accountable for the money they spend on research funding. Research quality measurement exercises, such as the Excellence in Research for Australia initiative, use a number of agreed indicators to measure, analyse and report on various institution and discipline-based research outputs. This emphasis on the outputs of research as opposed to its longer term outcomes is having an effect on internal university policy and processes which can often operate negatively on individual staff career development and promotion. This article reports on a project aimed at more clearly articulating and defining the idea of research impact for academics by preparing a promotion application. Phase one of the project was an extensive international literature review and this article sets out the findings from this review, considers the difficulties for articulating and evidences impact at the individual level and makes some suggestions for how academic staff and units might begin to deal with the idea of research impact.

AB - Around the world, governments and the higher education sector are being asked to become more accountable for the money they spend on research funding. Research quality measurement exercises, such as the Excellence in Research for Australia initiative, use a number of agreed indicators to measure, analyse and report on various institution and discipline-based research outputs. This emphasis on the outputs of research as opposed to its longer term outcomes is having an effect on internal university policy and processes which can often operate negatively on individual staff career development and promotion. This article reports on a project aimed at more clearly articulating and defining the idea of research impact for academics by preparing a promotion application. Phase one of the project was an extensive international literature review and this article sets out the findings from this review, considers the difficulties for articulating and evidences impact at the individual level and makes some suggestions for how academic staff and units might begin to deal with the idea of research impact.

KW - bibliometrics

KW - ERA

KW - Excellence in Research for Australia

KW - impact

KW - research quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881633608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2013.812173

DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2013.812173

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 410

EP - 420

JO - Journal of Tertiary Education Administration

JF - Journal of Tertiary Education Administration

SN - 1360-080X

IS - 4

ER -