TY - JOUR
T1 - Meatal cleaning with antiseptics for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections
T2 - A discussion paper
AU - Fasugba, Oyebola
AU - Koerner, Jane
AU - Mitchell, Brett G.
AU - Gardner, Anne
N1 - Funding Information:
Given the importance of meatal colonisation in the pathogenesis of CAUTI, emerging issues with AMR, the frequency with which catheters are used and the burden of CAUTI in Australia and in hospital settings worldwide, generation of evidence using a high-quality randomised trial is needed. With the inconclusive evidence to date, mainly due to methodological issues in the conduct of previous studies, adopting this approach of undertaking a randomised controlled trial is the best alternative to address the poor evidence. A rigorously conducted and sufficiently powered study will provide concrete evidence on the benefits of meatal cleaning with antiseptics in reducing CAUTIs. To progress the potential strategy for reducing CAUTIs through meatal cleaning, a randomised controlled trial aimed at assessing the efficacy and cost effectiveness of an antiseptic agent (chlorhexidine) for meatal cleaning in preventing CAUTI in Australian acute hospitals is currently in progress. This study brings together the systematic review project investigators and other leading Australian health professionals in the fields of infectious diseases, microbiology and health economics to test an effective strategy aimed at reducing CAUTI in Australian hospitals. The study is being funded by a Category 1 Australian Competitive Grant and led by Associate Professor Brett Mitchell (chief investigator) at the Avondale College of Higher Education. The randomised controlled trial will utilise a stepped wedge design with a random sequential allocation of the intervention (chlorhexidine) to participating hospitals over the study period. The findings from this trial will be crucial to informing clinical practice and policy both in Australia and internationally, given the frequency with which indwelling urinary catheters are used globally. The trial findings will also inform the development of infection control evidence based guidelines leading to benefits for patient safety and healthcare budgets. Currently in Australia, the National Health and Medical Research Council in partnership with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare work in collaboration to develop Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare. The randomised controlled trial will contribute significantly to the future guidelines in Australia and internationally. The protocol for the randomised control trial providing details of the study processes is being prepared for publication and study sites are currently being recruited for participation in the trial.
Funding Information:
The systematic review and meta-analysis which informed the discussion was funded primarily by a seed grant from the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control and an Australian Catholic University Health Sciences Vacation Scholarship grant.
Funding Information:
The systematic review and meta-analysis which informed the discussion was funded primarily by a seed grant from the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control and an Australian Catholic University Health Sciences Vacation Scholarship grant.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Urinary tract infections related to indwelling urinary catheters, known as catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), are largely preventable healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Healthcare-associated infections including CAUTI are associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased resistance of microorganisms to antimicrobials, increased morbidity and mortality as well as additional financial burden on health care systems, patients and their families. While the optimal aim for patients and the health care system is to prevent CAUTI using measures such as reducing unnecessary placement and early removal of urinary catheters, there is evidence that cleaning of the meatal or peri-urethral area with antiseptic prior to catheter insertion and care of this area while the catheter is insitu has the potential to reduce CAUTI. Evidence suggests that meatal cleaning with antiseptics while the catheter is insitu is non-beneficial in reducing CAUTI but current international and Australian guidelines for infection control professionals identifies that the benefit of antiseptic solution versus non-antiseptic solution for meatal or peri-urethral cleaning before urinary catheter insertion remains unresolved. This discussion paper therefore focuses primarily on antiseptic meatal cleaning prior to urinary catheter insertion in preventing CAUTI. Using evidence from a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, this paper discusses the scope of the problem and limitations in the evidence regarding the effectiveness of antiseptics for preventing CAUTI and finally, proposes a way forward through the undertaking of a rigorously conducted randomised controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antiseptic meatal cleaning for prevention of CAUTI.
AB - Urinary tract infections related to indwelling urinary catheters, known as catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), are largely preventable healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Healthcare-associated infections including CAUTI are associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased resistance of microorganisms to antimicrobials, increased morbidity and mortality as well as additional financial burden on health care systems, patients and their families. While the optimal aim for patients and the health care system is to prevent CAUTI using measures such as reducing unnecessary placement and early removal of urinary catheters, there is evidence that cleaning of the meatal or peri-urethral area with antiseptic prior to catheter insertion and care of this area while the catheter is insitu has the potential to reduce CAUTI. Evidence suggests that meatal cleaning with antiseptics while the catheter is insitu is non-beneficial in reducing CAUTI but current international and Australian guidelines for infection control professionals identifies that the benefit of antiseptic solution versus non-antiseptic solution for meatal or peri-urethral cleaning before urinary catheter insertion remains unresolved. This discussion paper therefore focuses primarily on antiseptic meatal cleaning prior to urinary catheter insertion in preventing CAUTI. Using evidence from a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, this paper discusses the scope of the problem and limitations in the evidence regarding the effectiveness of antiseptics for preventing CAUTI and finally, proposes a way forward through the undertaking of a rigorously conducted randomised controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antiseptic meatal cleaning for prevention of CAUTI.
KW - Catheter-related infections
KW - Cross infection
KW - Infection control
KW - Urinary tract infections
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021713532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.idh.2017.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.idh.2017.06.004
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 31862089
AN - SCOPUS:85021713532
SN - 2468-0451
VL - 22
SP - 136
EP - 143
JO - Infection, Disease and Health
JF - Infection, Disease and Health
IS - 3
ER -