Mega-event volunteers, similar or different? Vancouver 2010 vs London 2012

Tracey DICKSON, Angela Benson, F. Anne Terwiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare motivations of volunteers at two mega multi-sport events. Design/methodology/approach - The research used a quantitative research design to survey volunteers at the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (n ¼ 2,066) and the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games (n ¼ 11,451) via an online questionnaire based upon the Special Event Volunteer Motivation Scale. Findings - The results indicate that the volunteers, most of whom had previously volunteered, were motivated by similar variables, including the uniqueness of the event, the desire to make it a success and to give back to their community. The results of the principal components analysis indicated that most items of the scale loaded onto similar components across the two research contexts. Research limitations/implications - There were methodological limitations in terms of the timing of the questionnaire administration and Likert scales used, however, these issues were controlled by gatekeepers. These limitations could have research implication for comparative studies of volunteers at mega events. Practical implications - Understanding volunteer motivations will enable event managers and volunteer managers to plan for legacy. Social implications - Volunteer motivations include wanting to give back to their community and therefore, increases the potential for volunteer legacy. Originality/value - This is the first research that: enables comparison of winter and summer Olympic and Paralympic Games volunteers; has substantial sample sizes in relation to the variables; applies higher item loadings to strengthen the analysis; and involves the use of the same instrument across events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-179
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Event and Festival Management
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Volunteers
Mega-events
Olympics
Questionnaire
Winter
Managers
Special events
Design methodology
Quantitative research
Uniqueness
Comparative study
Gatekeeper
Sports events
Principal component analysis
Research design
Sample size

Cite this

@article{296c6a00328740528574ad574d4c4bdf,
title = "Mega-event volunteers, similar or different? Vancouver 2010 vs London 2012",
abstract = "Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare motivations of volunteers at two mega multi-sport events. Design/methodology/approach - The research used a quantitative research design to survey volunteers at the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (n ¼ 2,066) and the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games (n ¼ 11,451) via an online questionnaire based upon the Special Event Volunteer Motivation Scale. Findings - The results indicate that the volunteers, most of whom had previously volunteered, were motivated by similar variables, including the uniqueness of the event, the desire to make it a success and to give back to their community. The results of the principal components analysis indicated that most items of the scale loaded onto similar components across the two research contexts. Research limitations/implications - There were methodological limitations in terms of the timing of the questionnaire administration and Likert scales used, however, these issues were controlled by gatekeepers. These limitations could have research implication for comparative studies of volunteers at mega events. Practical implications - Understanding volunteer motivations will enable event managers and volunteer managers to plan for legacy. Social implications - Volunteer motivations include wanting to give back to their community and therefore, increases the potential for volunteer legacy. Originality/value - This is the first research that: enables comparison of winter and summer Olympic and Paralympic Games volunteers; has substantial sample sizes in relation to the variables; applies higher item loadings to strengthen the analysis; and involves the use of the same instrument across events.",
keywords = "Volunteers, Motivations, Mega sport events, Olympics, Paralympics, Principal component analysis., Principal component analysis",
author = "Tracey DICKSON and Angela Benson and Terwiel, {F. Anne}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1108/IJEFM-07-2013-0019",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "164--179",
journal = "International Journal of Event and Festival Management",
issn = "1758-2954",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Mega-event volunteers, similar or different? Vancouver 2010 vs London 2012. / DICKSON, Tracey; Benson, Angela; Terwiel, F. Anne.

In: International Journal of Event and Festival Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2014, p. 164-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mega-event volunteers, similar or different? Vancouver 2010 vs London 2012

AU - DICKSON, Tracey

AU - Benson, Angela

AU - Terwiel, F. Anne

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare motivations of volunteers at two mega multi-sport events. Design/methodology/approach - The research used a quantitative research design to survey volunteers at the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (n ¼ 2,066) and the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games (n ¼ 11,451) via an online questionnaire based upon the Special Event Volunteer Motivation Scale. Findings - The results indicate that the volunteers, most of whom had previously volunteered, were motivated by similar variables, including the uniqueness of the event, the desire to make it a success and to give back to their community. The results of the principal components analysis indicated that most items of the scale loaded onto similar components across the two research contexts. Research limitations/implications - There were methodological limitations in terms of the timing of the questionnaire administration and Likert scales used, however, these issues were controlled by gatekeepers. These limitations could have research implication for comparative studies of volunteers at mega events. Practical implications - Understanding volunteer motivations will enable event managers and volunteer managers to plan for legacy. Social implications - Volunteer motivations include wanting to give back to their community and therefore, increases the potential for volunteer legacy. Originality/value - This is the first research that: enables comparison of winter and summer Olympic and Paralympic Games volunteers; has substantial sample sizes in relation to the variables; applies higher item loadings to strengthen the analysis; and involves the use of the same instrument across events.

AB - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare motivations of volunteers at two mega multi-sport events. Design/methodology/approach - The research used a quantitative research design to survey volunteers at the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (n ¼ 2,066) and the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games (n ¼ 11,451) via an online questionnaire based upon the Special Event Volunteer Motivation Scale. Findings - The results indicate that the volunteers, most of whom had previously volunteered, were motivated by similar variables, including the uniqueness of the event, the desire to make it a success and to give back to their community. The results of the principal components analysis indicated that most items of the scale loaded onto similar components across the two research contexts. Research limitations/implications - There were methodological limitations in terms of the timing of the questionnaire administration and Likert scales used, however, these issues were controlled by gatekeepers. These limitations could have research implication for comparative studies of volunteers at mega events. Practical implications - Understanding volunteer motivations will enable event managers and volunteer managers to plan for legacy. Social implications - Volunteer motivations include wanting to give back to their community and therefore, increases the potential for volunteer legacy. Originality/value - This is the first research that: enables comparison of winter and summer Olympic and Paralympic Games volunteers; has substantial sample sizes in relation to the variables; applies higher item loadings to strengthen the analysis; and involves the use of the same instrument across events.

KW - Volunteers

KW - Motivations

KW - Mega sport events

KW - Olympics

KW - Paralympics

KW - Principal component analysis.

KW - Principal component analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926331319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJEFM-07-2013-0019

DO - 10.1108/IJEFM-07-2013-0019

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 164

EP - 179

JO - International Journal of Event and Festival Management

JF - International Journal of Event and Festival Management

SN - 1758-2954

IS - 2

ER -