Mental health literacy study of general practitioners: A comparative study in Singapore and Australia

Gordon Parker, Cheng Lee, Helen Chen, Joshua Kua, Jennifer Loh, Anthony F Jorm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: To compare responses to a mental health literacy survey by general practitioners in Singapore and Australia.

Method: Cross-sectional surveys of general practitioners were undertaken in Australia in 1996 (n = 872) and in Singapore in 1999 (n = 264). Questionnaires provided vignettes of schizophrenia and depression, and sought responses to a range of information assessing mental health literacy.

Results: The two groups returned generally similar responses, with high diagnostic accuracy and distinctly high agreement in judging the likely helpfulness of a range of resource people, activities and therapies. In addition to a few minor differences, the Singaporean practitioners tended to view outcome for the disorders more optimistically and to differentiate less in estimating outcome for the two disorders.

Conclusions: Previous reports of the responses by the Australian general practitioners had generally shown their views to be consistent with mental health professionals and, on several important parameters, discordant with the views of the Australian general public. This report highlights distinct similarities in general practitioner responses across cultures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-59
Number of pages5
JournalAustralasian Psychiatry
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Mental health literacy study of general practitioners: A comparative study in Singapore and Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this