Mental health literacy study of general practitioners

A comparative study in Singapore and Australia

Gordon Parker, Cheng Lee, Helen Chen, Joshua Kua, Jennifer Loh, Anthony F Jorm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare responses to a mental health literacy survey by general practitioners in Singapore and Australia.

Method: Cross-sectional surveys of general practitioners were undertaken in Australia in 1996 (n = 872) and in Singapore in 1999 (n = 264). Questionnaires provided vignettes of schizophrenia and depression, and sought responses to a range of information assessing mental health literacy.

Results: The two groups returned generally similar responses, with high diagnostic accuracy and distinctly high agreement in judging the likely helpfulness of a range of resource people, activities and therapies. In addition to a few minor differences, the Singaporean practitioners tended to view outcome for the disorders more optimistically and to differentiate less in estimating outcome for the two disorders.

Conclusions: Previous reports of the responses by the Australian general practitioners had generally shown their views to be consistent with mental health professionals and, on several important parameters, discordant with the views of the Australian general public. This report highlights distinct similarities in general practitioner responses across cultures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-59
Number of pages5
JournalAustralasian Psychiatry
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Singapore
General Practitioners
Mental Health
Health Surveys
Schizophrenia
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depression

Cite this

Parker, Gordon ; Lee, Cheng ; Chen, Helen ; Kua, Joshua ; Loh, Jennifer ; Jorm, Anthony F. / Mental health literacy study of general practitioners : A comparative study in Singapore and Australia. In: Australasian Psychiatry. 2001 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 55-59.
@article{dad4af204ef847248e993b3a50a205ac,
title = "Mental health literacy study of general practitioners: A comparative study in Singapore and Australia",
abstract = "Objective: To compare responses to a mental health literacy survey by general practitioners in Singapore and Australia. Method: Cross-sectional surveys of general practitioners were undertaken in Australia in 1996 (n = 872) and in Singapore in 1999 (n = 264). Questionnaires provided vignettes of schizophrenia and depression, and sought responses to a range of information assessing mental health literacy. Results: The two groups returned generally similar responses, with high diagnostic accuracy and distinctly high agreement in judging the likely helpfulness of a range of resource people, activities and therapies. In addition to a few minor differences, the Singaporean practitioners tended to view outcome for the disorders more optimistically and to differentiate less in estimating outcome for the two disorders. Conclusions: Previous reports of the responses by the Australian general practitioners had generally shown their views to be consistent with mental health professionals and, on several important parameters, discordant with the views of the Australian general public. This report highlights distinct similarities in general practitioner responses across cultures.",
author = "Gordon Parker and Cheng Lee and Helen Chen and Joshua Kua and Jennifer Loh and Jorm, {Anthony F}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1046/j.1440-1665.2001.00304.x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "55--59",
journal = "Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists",
issn = "1039-8562",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Mental health literacy study of general practitioners : A comparative study in Singapore and Australia. / Parker, Gordon; Lee, Cheng; Chen, Helen; Kua, Joshua; Loh, Jennifer; Jorm, Anthony F.

In: Australasian Psychiatry, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2001, p. 55-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental health literacy study of general practitioners

T2 - A comparative study in Singapore and Australia

AU - Parker, Gordon

AU - Lee, Cheng

AU - Chen, Helen

AU - Kua, Joshua

AU - Loh, Jennifer

AU - Jorm, Anthony F

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: To compare responses to a mental health literacy survey by general practitioners in Singapore and Australia. Method: Cross-sectional surveys of general practitioners were undertaken in Australia in 1996 (n = 872) and in Singapore in 1999 (n = 264). Questionnaires provided vignettes of schizophrenia and depression, and sought responses to a range of information assessing mental health literacy. Results: The two groups returned generally similar responses, with high diagnostic accuracy and distinctly high agreement in judging the likely helpfulness of a range of resource people, activities and therapies. In addition to a few minor differences, the Singaporean practitioners tended to view outcome for the disorders more optimistically and to differentiate less in estimating outcome for the two disorders. Conclusions: Previous reports of the responses by the Australian general practitioners had generally shown their views to be consistent with mental health professionals and, on several important parameters, discordant with the views of the Australian general public. This report highlights distinct similarities in general practitioner responses across cultures.

AB - Objective: To compare responses to a mental health literacy survey by general practitioners in Singapore and Australia. Method: Cross-sectional surveys of general practitioners were undertaken in Australia in 1996 (n = 872) and in Singapore in 1999 (n = 264). Questionnaires provided vignettes of schizophrenia and depression, and sought responses to a range of information assessing mental health literacy. Results: The two groups returned generally similar responses, with high diagnostic accuracy and distinctly high agreement in judging the likely helpfulness of a range of resource people, activities and therapies. In addition to a few minor differences, the Singaporean practitioners tended to view outcome for the disorders more optimistically and to differentiate less in estimating outcome for the two disorders. Conclusions: Previous reports of the responses by the Australian general practitioners had generally shown their views to be consistent with mental health professionals and, on several important parameters, discordant with the views of the Australian general public. This report highlights distinct similarities in general practitioner responses across cultures.

U2 - 10.1046/j.1440-1665.2001.00304.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1440-1665.2001.00304.x

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 55

EP - 59

JO - Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists

JF - Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists

SN - 1039-8562

IS - 1

ER -