Abstract
This article develops a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. The heuristic depicts four network types by combining network structure with the state’s capacity to metagovern. It suggests that each network type produces a particular combination of input and output legitimacy. We illustrate the heuristic and its utility using a comparative study of agri-food networks (organic farming and land use) in four countries, which each exhibit different combinations of input and output legitimacy respectively. The article concludes by using a fifth case study to illustrate what a network type that produces high levels of input and output legitimacy might look like.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1223-1245 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Administration and Society |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2017 |