TY - JOUR
T1 - Metastasectomy and BRAF mutation; an analysis of survival outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer
AU - Prasanna, Thiru
AU - Wong, Rachel
AU - Price, Timothy
AU - Shapiro, Jeremy
AU - Tie, Jeanne
AU - Wong, Hui-Li
AU - Nott, Louise
AU - Roder, David
AU - Lee, Margaret
AU - Kosmider, Suzanne
AU - Jalali, Azim
AU - Burge, Matthew
AU - Padbury, Robert
AU - Maddern, Guy
AU - Carruthers, Scott
AU - Moore, James
AU - Sorich, Michael
AU - Karapetis, Christos S.
AU - Gibbs, Peter
AU - Yip, Desmond
N1 - Funding Information:
Roche Products Pty Limited has provided financial assistance for the development, installation, and maintenance of the BioGrid-TRACC registry. The South Australian State Government has provided support for the maintenance of the SA Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Registry. Conflicts of Interest: PG has disclosed honoraria from Amgen and Merck. DY has indicated grants from Ipsen, Novartis, Roche. ML has indicated honoraria from Amgen and Merck. All other authors have indicated no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
Conflicts of Interest: PG has disclosed honoraria from Amgen and Merck. DY has indicated grants from Ipsen, Novartis, Roche. ML has indicated honoraria from Amgen and Merck. All other authors have indicated no conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background: Resection of oligometastases improves survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It is unclear whether the benefit is consistent for BRAF V600E mutant (MT) and wild type (WT) mCRC. This retrospective analysis explores the influence of BRAF MT on survival after metastasectomy. Methods: Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for BRAF MT and WT mCRC were evaluated. Survival was also analyzed in the cohort of BRAF MT with or without metastasectomy. Results: Five hundred and thirteen patients who had undergone metastasectomy were identified, 6% were BRAF-MT. Median age 63. Median OS in BRAF MT vs WT: 25.7 vs 48.5 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.95; 1.18-3.22). However, difference was not significant in a multivariate model. Right primary tumor, intact primary, >1 metastatic site, non-R0 resection, peritoneal metastasis, and synchronous metastasis were independent predictors of worse OS. Among 364 patients with RFS data there was no difference between BRAF MT and WT (16 vs 19 months, p=0.09). In another cohort of 158 BRAF-MT patients, OS was significantly better after metastasectomy compared to “no metastasectomy” (HR 0.34; 0.18-0.65, P= 0.001). Proficient mismatch repair status showed a trend toward worse survival after metastasectomy in BRAF MT (HR 1.71, P = 0.08). Conclusion: OS did not differ after metastasectomy between BRAF MT and WT in a multivariate model. Median OS was >2 years in this study after metastasectomy among BRAFV600E MT patients suggesting a survival benefit of metastasectomy in this group where systemic therapeutic options are limited. Metastasectomy may be considered in carefully selected BRAF-MT patients.
AB - Background: Resection of oligometastases improves survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It is unclear whether the benefit is consistent for BRAF V600E mutant (MT) and wild type (WT) mCRC. This retrospective analysis explores the influence of BRAF MT on survival after metastasectomy. Methods: Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for BRAF MT and WT mCRC were evaluated. Survival was also analyzed in the cohort of BRAF MT with or without metastasectomy. Results: Five hundred and thirteen patients who had undergone metastasectomy were identified, 6% were BRAF-MT. Median age 63. Median OS in BRAF MT vs WT: 25.7 vs 48.5 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.95; 1.18-3.22). However, difference was not significant in a multivariate model. Right primary tumor, intact primary, >1 metastatic site, non-R0 resection, peritoneal metastasis, and synchronous metastasis were independent predictors of worse OS. Among 364 patients with RFS data there was no difference between BRAF MT and WT (16 vs 19 months, p=0.09). In another cohort of 158 BRAF-MT patients, OS was significantly better after metastasectomy compared to “no metastasectomy” (HR 0.34; 0.18-0.65, P= 0.001). Proficient mismatch repair status showed a trend toward worse survival after metastasectomy in BRAF MT (HR 1.71, P = 0.08). Conclusion: OS did not differ after metastasectomy between BRAF MT and WT in a multivariate model. Median OS was >2 years in this study after metastasectomy among BRAFV600E MT patients suggesting a survival benefit of metastasectomy in this group where systemic therapeutic options are limited. Metastasectomy may be considered in carefully selected BRAF-MT patients.
KW - Metastasectomy
KW - Metastatic colorectal cancer
KW - BRAF V600E mutation
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089529675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100637
DO - 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100637
M3 - Review article
SN - 0147-0272
VL - 45
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Current Problems in Cancer
JF - Current Problems in Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - 100637
ER -